> WindsorFox wrote:

>> Rich Clark, aka Left Rev Egg Plant, ULC, CotSG wrote:

>>> Ana C. Dent wrote:

>>>> Marginally Nutty <"" example.com> wrote in
>>>>news:TVq7i.4795$u56.3909@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net:

>

>>>>> Who is this Goodwin you speak of?

>>>> Are you incapable of using GOOGLE? I suspect so.

>

>>> Well, considering he'd get absolutely nothing related
>>> to Godwin's law (As an online discussion grows longer,
>>> the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or
>>> Hitler approaches one) by searching for Goodwin, how's
>>> he to get any kind of relevant results?

>

>> I entered Godwin into Google and the first link at the
>> top was a link to Wikipedia explaining Godwin's law. Th
>> second was Godwin, Earl of Wessex. ...

> Rich Clark, aka Left Rev Egg Plant, ULC, CotSG wrote:

>> Ana C. Dent wrote:

>>> Marginally Nutty <"" example.com> wrote in
>>> news:TVq7i.4795$u56.3909@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net:
>>>

>>>> Who is this Goodwin you speak of?

>>> Are you incapable of using GOOGLE? I suspect so.

>>
>> Well, considering he'd get absolutely nothing related
>> to Godwin's law (As an online discussion grows longer,
>> the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or
>> Hitler approaches one) by searching for Goodwin, how's
>> he to get any kind of relevant results?

>
>
> I entered Godwin into Google and the first link at the
> top was a link to Wikipedia explaining Godwin's law. Th
> second was Godwin, Earl of Wessex.

> Who to the left of me,
> What to the right,
> Here I am, stuck in this thread with yooooooooo
> and I'm wondering what the fsck I should do.
> ...
>
> --
> rbg
>
> |foam|__
> |beer|_ | Beer.
> |beer|_||
> |beer|__| Never leave foam without it.
> |UUUU|

> In article ,
> WindsorFox SPAMcox.net> writes:

>> Does anyone here have a phone number and/or contact for Sympatico's
>> abuse? I mean other than the obvious ones.

>
> You could try sending a snail-mail letter to the CEO or president.
>

>
>
> WindsorFox
>
> Does anyone here have a phone number and/or contact for
> Sympatico's abuse? I mean other than the obvious ones. TIA -- "Humor
> is in the eye of the beholder. Some beholders are flat-out blind." -
> Dwight
> More options May 30, 3:58 pm
> Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email
> From: WindsorFox SPAMcox.net>
> Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 14:58:12 -0500
> Local: Wed, May 30 2007 3:58 pm
> Subject: Sympatico contact info
> Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
> original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
> Does anyone here have a phone number and/or contact for
> Sympatico's
> abuse? I mean other than the obvious ones. ...

> Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. wrote:

>> Rich Clark, aka Left Rev Egg Plant, ULC, CotSG inexplicably quoated the
>> whole goddammmed thing after the filters has successfully stopped it.:
>>
>> [bagged and tagged]
>>
>> That particular leak has been repaired.

>
> Once again, the usual NANAE groupthink, that we cannot allow any
> discussion outside the usual "spam is bad," "cats & coffee" or "how best
> to anally rape imprisoned spammers" topics, is reinforced.
>
> Thanks for playing. I guess I should shut up now and go back to lurk mode.

> sambal...@googlemail.com wrote:

>> Please remove our IP from the spam list. We are not spammers, just a
>> company.

>

>> sigmos GmbH
>> Am Steinfeld 12

>

>> 94065 Waldkirchen
>> Germany

>
> Is it the same guy that writes all of these poasts???
>
> --
> "Humor is in the eye of the beholder.
> Some beholders are flat-out blind." - Dwight

> On Thu, 31 May 2007 16:30:54 GMT, Bill Levinson
>
>
> I dunno. I have refused up to 300,000 per day from sources suspected
> under Soloway's control. Can't prove it, but it's what I believe.
>
>
> THEN maybe I'd see my mail servers start accepting more email than
> they are refusing.
>
> Currently, for every email I accept, I am at SMTP chat refusing about
> 130. It is an unknown how many emails we refuse because we do not
> allow the sending allocation any access at all to our allocations. EG:
> If you are in RIPE, KRNIC, LATNIC, AFRINIC, or APNIC, it is likely you
> are filtered not just from email, but all contact with my allocation.
> Only about 2%% of those rir's are allowed to connect to my network, be
> it SMTP, ICMP, UDP, or TCP. My network is a special case. In most
> instances, legitimate contacts will be within 100 miles of our
> location. Not all networks can work to that assumption. ...

> Ana C. Dent wrote:

>> Marginally Nutty <"" example.com> wrote in
>> news:TVq7i.4795$u56.3909@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net:
>>

>>> Who is this Goodwin you speak of?

>> Are you incapable of using GOOGLE? I suspect so.

>
> Well, considering he'd get absolutely nothing related to Godwin's law
> (As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison
> involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one) by searching for Goodwin,
> how's he to get any kind of relevant results?