|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: spammers_liespammers_lie
Date: Feb 28, 2007 11:02
DC Hart BoulderPledge.org> wrote:
>On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:48:53 +0100, Steve Linford
> spamhaus.org> opined:>> In article 216.168.3.64>,
>> No 33 Secretary gmail.com> wrote:...
|
| Show full article (1.62Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: DLUDLU
Date: Feb 28, 2007 10:42
DevilsPGD wrote:
> In message newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net> DLU
> justthe.net> wrote:
>
> >>Even worse if you are charged in a criminal case, you pay the cost of
>>defense and even if you win, you can not collect from the prosecutor.
>>At least in a civil case, you can ask for costs to be paid by the
>>litigant but in most cases you will not get them.
>
>
> Of course in this example, the lawyer is free if you so desire...
|
| Show full article (1.30Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Dr. HotSaltDr. HotSalt
Date: Feb 28, 2007 10:21
On Feb 28, 9:14 am, "Tonico" yahoo.com> wrote:> On 28 feb, 18:28, Kevin S. Wilson spro.net> wrote:
> ...........................> >Hmmmm....Since the universe is one huge plutonium atom, as you've>>>brilliantly discovered, have you thought of the possibility that
>>>spammer that is bugging you is one of those nasty protons in the
>>>atom's nucleus? Or perhaps it is one of those evil quarks that wander
>>>around from time to time?
>>>Tonio
>
>> Tonio, meet Archie Pu.
>
> *******************************************8
> Hi there, Archie Kevin Pu Wilson! Nice to meet you (I guess...).
> Why do you have so long a name?
Relax, SWilson was merely trying to warn you off becoming entangled
with Archie Pu- doing so is almost guaranteed to drive you insane
trying to correct his fantasies.
OTOH becoming entangled with SWilson is definitive proof you're
already insane, so never mind.
|
| Show full article (0.94Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Kevin S. WilsonKevin S. Wilson
Date: Feb 28, 2007 10:20
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:10:23 -0800, Quaestor wrote:
>Michael Moroney wrote:
>
>>"a_plutonium" hotmail.com> writes:
>>>>>What I cannot figure out is how Microsoft has a flaw in their hotmail
>>>system that allows spammers to penetrate
>>>by simply putting the targeted address in both the From and To lines.
>>>
>>A flaw in Microsoft software? Has anyone ever heard of such a thing,
>>EVER?
>>
>>Impossible.
>>
>That's because the flaw is not in the software, it is in the company.
>Always has been, always will be.
>
>Crosspost removed. This is an obvious troll for points.
Crosspost restored. Archie Pu doesn't troll.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: RadicalModerateRadicalModerate
Date: Feb 28, 2007 10:11
Add Homonym snerts-r-us.org> wrote:
> I suppose there is no reason one of their mirror sites cannot do it?
> Or someone could get a "bullet proof" hosting package and set up a site
> specifically to host the apews data as a flat file?
Currently there's not much of a defense against say 50-100,000
zombies all connecting to your site to download a large file and
thus cause either an outage or massive bandwidth overage charges.
--
The published From: address is a trap.
If you really want to send me email,
request a private reply in the group.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Add HomonymAdd Homonym
Date: Feb 28, 2007 10:06
Quaestor wrote:
>You can't get very far actually believing it,
> though.
What do you mean by that?
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: QuaestorQuaestor
Date: Feb 28, 2007 10:04
DC Hart wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:50:09 +0100, Steve Linford
> spamhaus.org> opined:
>
>>>In article comcast.com>,
>> Ryan none.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>What...
|
| Show full article (1.38Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: QuaestorQuaestor
Date: Feb 28, 2007 09:57
Johann Steigenberger wrote:
>Sometimes it can be *wise* to be paranoid :-)
>
>
Paranoiac, but not paranoid. Acting as if everyone is out to get you is
good defensive tactics. You can't get very far actually believing it,
though.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
