news.admin.netabuse.email
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
news.admin.netabuse.email only
 
Advanced search
June 2007
motuwethfrsasuw
    123 22
45678910 23
11121314151617 24
18192021222324 25
252627282930  26
2007
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007    
total
news.admin.netabuse.email Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Re: Is e360 Insight LLC (David Linhardt) a spammer?         


Author: grendal
Date: Jun 2, 2007 23:59

On Jun 2, 11:42 pm, huey.calli...@gmail.com wrote:
> grendal hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Mark Ferguson whew.com> wrote:
[SNIP]
>> Ok.
>> I trust that you know what you're doing.
>
> ...are you new here?
>
> --
> Huey

No. Just ignore your battle with Mark.

Besides Mark has spent more time in the courts than I have, so I'll
defer to his expertise.
no comments
  Re: MySpace Inc v. Optinrealbig.com LLC et al         


Author: Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr.
Date: Jun 2, 2007 22:25

glgxg wrote:
> Nigmatzyanov and Leschinskiy have entered into good faith discussions
> with MySpace to settle. In order to do so they need to file answers
> regarding the complaint. They have asked for an extension to submit the
> answers and the judge has given them until Jun 11th to do so.


So there may be something afoot if Richter is shuffling lawyers. Maybe
lawyers said "you shoulda settled to, we're gone".

Or summat.



--
Requiescas in pace o email

Ex turpi causa non oritur actio

http://members.cox.net/larrysheldon/
no comments
  Re: Is e360 Insight LLC (David Linhardt) a spammer?         


Author:
Date: Jun 2, 2007 21:51

Mark Ferguson wrote:
>
> Why would any lawyers need to show up? I don't have an ELI account
> and to my knowledge no other defendant has one either. Serve all the
> discovery on ELI you want.

ROFL. If Dave was hacked, his intellectual property is probably in
with the stuff collected by the agents that searched Soloways place.
no comments
  Re: Is e360 Insight LLC (David Linhardt) a spammer?         


Author: huey.callison
Date: Jun 2, 2007 21:42

grendal hotmail.com> wrote:
> Mark Ferguson whew.com> wrote:
>> grendal hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> Mark Ferguson whew.com> wrote:
>>>> grendal hotmail.com>
>>>>> Speaking of which, wasn't there a court appearance today?
>>>>> What happened?
>>>> Nothing of any meaning.
>>> So I take it your lawyers showed up?
>> Why would any lawyers need to show up? I don't have an ELI
>> account and to my knowledge no other defendant has one either.
>> Serve all the discovery on ELI you want.
> Hmmm.
> Ok.
> I trust that you know what you're doing.

...are you new here?

--
Huey
no comments
  Pain in the ass APEWS.ORG         


Author: Joe Cramblit
Date: Jun 2, 2007 21:41

I am no spammer! I don't host spammers! I've spent untold hours
getting my IP cleaned up after a hijacker got hold of a form and sent
out some spam 3 weeks ago on one of my domains. Everything has been
fixed.

I'm not listed on ANY DAMN black list but yours. And, you added my IP
on 5./31. My problems STOPPED on about 5/19. I haven't been on ANY
black lists for 10 days. Yesterday I was white listed by AOL.

I have not one piece of mail (bounced or otherwise) that contains ANY
reference to anything named APEWS in the source code. And I don't
delete emails. I searched them ALL!

So I have no bounced mail evidence. I have nothing. I have no know
issues anywhere and for the first time is HISTORY (I never heard of
APEWS until I searched DNSSTUFF) some automated "piece of crap system
that won't stop any real spam anyway" is attempting to undo all my
hours of work.

AND BEST OF ALL there is no recourse. There is no removal method. Just
some self appointed untouchable gods passing judgment. When "I stop
spamming" I'll eventually be removed. Screw you! I'm not spamming now!

You primarily succeed in only punishing victims.
9 Comments
  Lamie the hypocrite, *FAKE* plonk this :-)         


Author: Anonymous
Date: Jun 2, 2007 21:41

Lamie, you are abusive here and complain about people who
you think are abusive?

Subject: Re: IPOWER Technical "Support": Do it yourself.
From: Jamie
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 23:21:59 -0400
Message-ID: 4ax.com>
[snip usual Lamie silly huge unnecessary quoting]
>*PLONK* another useless troll to the bozo bin welcome to
>my kill file asshole!

You are one sorry hypocrite, Lamie.

Maybe newsfeeds.com wants to know about your abusive behavior?

X-Report: Please report illegal or inappropriate use to newsfeeds.com>

Maybe bell.ca will care to know you are running a web site
on your DSL line, while you promote your site via your
abusive posts here?

dns darkshado.ca
Canonical name: darkshado.ca
Addresses:
70.49.156.127
Show full article (0.95Kb)
1 Comment
  Re: [MEDIA][CBC] U.S. arrest does little to stem flow of spam         


Author: Bill Cole
Date: Jun 2, 2007 21:26

In article newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
DLU justthe.net> wrote:
> Marc Bissonnette wrote:
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2007/06/01/tech-spam.html
>>
>> Soloway's arrest mentioned on the CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation)
>> Several mentions of Spamhaus, too :)
>>
> Read the charges, he was nt arrested for spamming.

Only because spamming is not a chargeable offense.

He was charged with violating provisions of the law that were part of
CAN-SPAM. That's as close as a federal law comes to outlawing spam.

--
Clues for the blacklisted: <http://www.scconsult.com/bill/dnsblhelp.html>
Current Peeve: People who poke at the trolls and regularly post wildly
offtopic who still think others are being rude by auto-ignoring them
no comments
  Re: IPOWER Technical "Support": Do it yourself.         


Author:
Date: Jun 2, 2007 21:18

"Jamie" wrote in message
news:t3d4631bu1o470ulvnn9d2cjqdmnp80pev@4ax.com...
> *PLONK* back to the Bozo bin where you belong. You never learn do
> you Carlton. Go back on your meds agan and stay on them
> Carlton you senile old geezer.

'back to the Bozo bin'? If he was in your bozo bin from before, and he
didn't morph, then why is he out?

Because you either didn't plonk him in the first place (most likely) or took
him out of your bozo bin. Either way, you seeing him when you didn't want to
is YOUR fault, no one else's.

So your kooky public plonking of people again and again, even though they're
not morphing shows that there's only one kook involved in that transaction,
and it ain't the person being plonked.

Take a clue, Jamie... please, for once, take a clue. If someone says
something you don't like, either let it pass and STFU, or quietly plonk them
without all the histrionics you normally display.
Show full article (1.22Kb)
no comments
  Re: Affidavit for the searh warrant / Soloway         


Author: grendal
Date: Jun 2, 2007 21:10

On Jun 2, 9:43 am, Chris U nojunk.blueyonder.co.uk>
wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:07:36 -0700, Susan
>
> spamhaus.org> wrote:
>
>>g) AG reported to me that the spam sent by Soloway has created
>>substantial harm and loss to him both personally and professionally.
>>Included in the costs to him are the need to devote from two to three
>>hours, daily, to efforts to remove spam from his clients' accounts, or
>>to take special precautions in establishing accounts in order to
>>protect them from Soloway's spamming activity.
>>---------
>
>>And that's not the half of it.
Show full article (1.36Kb)
no comments
  Re: IPOWER Technical "Support": Do it yourself.         


Author: nobody >
Date: Jun 2, 2007 20:46

Jamie wrote:
> *PLONK* another useless troll to the bozo bin welcome to
> my kill file asshole!
>
>

*You* are an asshole. Plonk me again.
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9