|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Nuclear Incorporation. www.nuclear-inc.comNuclear Incorporation. www.nuclear-inc.com
Date: Apr 4, 2007 23:26
Nuclear Inc.
Advanced Internet & Email marketing softwares
www.nuclear-inc.com
Send 900 Billion valid Emails in Just 5 Minutes with our Nuclear Bot Software!
Post 500 Billion messages to Newsgroups, Blogs & Forums at the same in Just 5 minutes with our Nuclear Poster software!
Extract over 300 Million Valid Emails in Just 5 Minutes only!!
Boost your business by 100000000000%%%%%%%% in Just One week, with any of our softwares!
Drive very violent traffick to your website every second!
FREE TRIAL...30 days money back guarantee!
No need for any other marketing softwares, leads or opt in emails that cost you lost of money everyday for nothing, and kills your business!
Stop all your loss and start making real money right now with our softwares!!
Get your free trial, so days money back guarantee today!!
MAKE $$$$$ WITH AFFILIATE PROGRAM!!
Visit www.nuclear-inc.com today!!
|
| |
|
| |
2 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Carrol J DonoghueCarrol J Donoghue
Date: Apr 4, 2007 22:59
BrisbaneWeddingPhotographers.com - SCAM ARTISTS - BEWARE!
Owner Douglas MacDonald is also known as "Douglas St James", owner of
http://www.brisbaneweddingphotographers.com/
He is a known scam artist with an extensive criminal record. He's
taken money from dozens of innocent couples and destroyed the memories
of their weddings by never delivering promised wedding photos.
Before getting into this business, Douglas operated another scam
website (technoaussie)
Before that, Doug had been arrested several times for fraud and has
done time in prison for it.
His wife Margie comes from a background of prostitution and fetish
arts, and she also has a moderate criminal record.
Do not do business with these people. They are sure to burn you.
--
Carrol J Donoghue in New Zealand
|
| |
|
| |
1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: Greg SamsonGreg Samson
Date: Apr 4, 2007 22:00
Mike Purcell wrote:
> [moris froth snipped]
Heh, didn't even manage a complete morph this time.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author:
Date: Apr 4, 2007 21:31
Le 04 Apr 2007, Robert Feeple a
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: JamieJamie
Date: Apr 4, 2007 20:46
Another email from RIPE from another source
basically stating the same thing that they
are not responsible for the contents of their
database.
What good is it having a database if the data
within the database is incorrect?
This should be RIPE's responsibility to correct
any data which is reported as being incorrect.
Again the email address in this email has
been changed to one of my spamtraps to prevent
being harvested from the usenet newsgroups.
I can however be contacted at darkshad [at] darkshado.ca
Received: from darkshad.darkshado.ca (uucp@localhost.localdomain
[ 127.0.0.1])
by darkshad.darkshado.ca (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP
id l34EKBIU005518
for ; Wed...
|
| Show full article (4.99Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: JamieJamie
Date: Apr 4, 2007 20:45
I got an interesting email back from the good
folks at RIPE.
I sent them over an email notfying them
about incorrect whois data in one of their
records for one of their IP ranges.
82.56.0.0 - 82.59.255.255 which belongs to
telecomitalia.it
The email address listed in the WHOIS record
of ripe-staff@telecomitalia.it bounces back.
Please note that any email that is posted
here my email address has been changed to one
of my spamtraps to prevent it from being harvested
from the usenet newsgroups. I can however be
contacted at darkshad [at] darkshado.ca
Received: from darkshad.darkshado.ca (uucp@localhost.localdomain
[ 127.0.0.1])
by darkshad.darkshado.ca (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id
l32JeDdW010476
for ; Mon, 2 Apr...
|
| Show full article (6.23Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr.Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr.
Date: Apr 4, 2007 20:02
SneakyP wrote:
[bagged and tagged]
> No problem, I see some have replied to it multiple times. One has to
> wonder if the idjut was so k/f'ed that it has gone on for months
> without being seen - until recently.
I've noticed a lot of filter damage lately--stuff that used to be
stopped by Cox is getting through to my readers, stuff that the local
filters used to stop getting through to me.
And as a separate issue, it seems like more idjits are around to quote
the crap at length even when the filters stopped it at the first onslaught.
Going to be a long cold summer.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: SneakyPSneakyP
Date: Apr 4, 2007 19:47
On Apr 4, 9:41 pm, Buss Error yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 4 Apr 2007 18:59:32 -0700, "SneakyP" <48umof...@ sneakemail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On Apr 4, 8:05 pm, Buss Error yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:01:25 +0100, Mike Purcell bluetree4.net>
>
>>> Moronis is not a reasonable person. He won't change his (Ob quirk
>>> noted in advance) mind. And he'll never change his tune.
>
>>> That's the very defination of a k00k.
>
>>The same MoRoNis is the idjut you just responded to.
>
> Then I've porved what I set out to do. Sometimes one responds to a
> k00k unknowingly.
>
> For which, I'm very sorry for having done so.
|
| Show full article (0.83Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: Buss ErrorBuss Error
Date: Apr 4, 2007 19:41
On 4 Apr 2007 18:59:32 -0700, "SneakyP" <48umofa02@ sneakemail.com>
wrote:
>On Apr 4, 8:05 pm, Buss Error yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 16:01:25 +0100, Mike Purcell bluetree4.net>
>
>> Moronis is not a reasonable person. He won't change his (Ob quirk
>> noted in advance) mind. And he'll never change his tune.
>>
>> That's the very defination of a k00k.
>
>The same MoRoNis is the idjut you just responded to.
Then I've porved what I set out to do. Sometimes one responds to a
k00k unknowingly.
For which, I'm very sorry for having done so.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Mark FergusonMark Ferguson
Date: Apr 4, 2007 19:35
In article reader2.panix.com>, sethb@panix.com
says...
>> I'm not sure where you live, but in the US
>>the accused has a right to review the evidence.
>
> You've accused Mark of having opted in for your mailings. Why won't
> you provide him with the "evidence" he has repeatedly asked for?
The only way Dave will answer that is when it is in a court
room and the judge orders him to do so. When he serves me he
can look forward to that and other questions that I have not
even posted about.
> You would seem to be one of those hypocrites who thinks rules are for
> other people. You certainly don't like it when the truth is told
> about you.
Splorf....
|
| Show full article (0.89Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|