|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: JH Abuse TeamJH Abuse Team
Date: Apr 13, 2007 07:33
Hello Shmuel,
On Apr 13, 5:40 am, "Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz"
library.lspace.org.invalid> wrote:>>And I hope we wont be black listed for anyone else's history in this
>>matter.
>
> If a provider is a black hat, it's easier to block entire allocations
> rather than tracking individual customers. If your provider is listed,
> that is not a reflection on you but it could well affect your
> connectivity.
## Agreed it is not easy to maintain smaller subnets.
It, on the other hand, also means lot (and i really mean lots of)
legit mails not reaching its destination.
|
| Show full article (1.69Kb) |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: R. ScottR. Scott
Date: Apr 13, 2007 06:54
Gads their rebuttle reads like a 12 year old tossing a tantrum wrote it.
|
| |
|
| |
2 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: 4pm7-mvax4pm7-mvax
Date: Apr 13, 2007 06:15
The SPEWS / SPAMHAUS FLIES seem to be, once again, hard at work to
silence the opposition to their beloved blacklists. These super COWARD
idiots (who hide behind anonymous newsgroup accounts) *still* hadn't
got their lessons. They mailbomb (aka spam) innocent ISPs and threaten
them with forged postings as evidence. They abuse and harass their
opponents and falsely label them as 'spammers'. Here is the news,
flies: Your beloved SPEWS blacklist is already DEAD. Your beloved
Spamhaus is next on the line. Nothing, absolutely no amount of
sinister actions from you, will stop the outcome you are all dreading.
Enjoy it!
|
| |
|
27 Comments |
|
|
Author: QuaestorQuaestor
Date: Apr 13, 2007 06:05
DevilsPGD wrote:
>In message 4ax.com> Spin Dryer
>privacy.net> wrote:
>
>
>>>Moris now back to abusing Plusnet, perhaps they may do better this
>>time with the blatant lies Moris is spouting. Libel is a crime in the
>>UK, and this is a clear case to be answered.
>>
>>
>
>Then have him charged, or sue him. ISPs are not law enforcement tools.
>
I'd like to have him charged, with about 500,000 gigawatts DC.
|
| Show full article (0.66Kb) |
|
2 Comments |
|
|
Author: QuaestorQuaestor
Date: Apr 13, 2007 06:03
Angel wrote:
>On 2007-04-12, Stephen Satchell satchell.net> wrote:
>( Snipped a very interesting read about e360's anon spam generating
>domains. )
>
>>>Why does this start to feel like I'm looking at midnight for the black
>>cat in the coal cellar? Which might not even be there?
>>
>>
>
>I'm wondering, shouldn't we have a Rule which says, "Spammers hide."?
>
spammers are like flashers: they want to show themselves (as if anyone
wants to see them), then run and hide (for what purposes we shall not
speculate).
|
| Show full article (0.73Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: QuaestorQuaestor
Date: Apr 13, 2007 05:47
>e360Insight,
>
>I am quite pleased to see that your psuedo political movement to try
>and turn the tides against anti-spam organizations is failing
>miserably. A little too terrorist like(non-violent of course), but the
>same idea, no?
>
Only one thing left for him to try: a suicide attack. I suggest the top
of the snears tower would be a good place to start, and the sidewalk
below a good place to end.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Patricia A. ShafferPatricia A. Shaffer
Date: Apr 13, 2007 05:46
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:40:44 +0200, Lemat
wrote:
>John Doe wrote:
>>
>> Extracting money from a spammer is going to be much like extracting
>> blood from a stone. For the same reasons.
>
>I would be ok if someone extracted blood from a spammer and money from
>the stone.
One could always apply stone to spammer and get blood that way: if you
film it, you'll get money from selling copies.
--
Patricia
VERY Proud Citizen of the Commonwealth of Virginia
"Anti-spammers are the immune system of the Internet." CDR M. Dobson
"The issue is consent, not content." Crosscut
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: 4pm7-mvax4pm7-mvax
Date: Apr 13, 2007 05:45
On Apr 12, 8:12 pm, Dave Pritchett (AKA Spin Dryer) privacy.net>
wrote:> On 12 Apr 2007 04:04:51 -0700, [anti.spam....@ googlemail.com] said :-
>
> Moris now back to abusing Plusnet, perhaps they may do better this
> time with the blatant lies Moris is spouting. Libel is a crime in the
> UK, and this is a clear case to be answered.
Replace /blatant lies/ with /the whole truth/
Replace /spouting/ with /exposing the spamhaus fraud/
Any case to be answered, will be the one directed at Steve Linford,
the CONMAN CEO of spamhaus.org.
> Be aware Moris, in fact you'd better hide.
I guess this is supposed to be a threat, ABUSIVE SCUMBAG Dave
Pritchett (AKA Spin Dryer)????
(For the unitiated: A cart00ney is a comical/farcical/fake threat that
you make to frighten your enemy!)
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: 4pm7-mvax4pm7-mvax
Date: Apr 13, 2007 05:20
On Apr 12, 2:27 pm, Mark Ferguson whew.com>
wrote:
Ferguson>
CONMAN Steve Linford, CONWOMAN Susan Wilson (the money-grabbing SCUMS
from spamhaus.org), Rich Tietjens (AKA Morely Dotes - SPEWS SCUM) and
you, Mark Ferguson (AKA CHIEF SPEWS PRICK; the idiot who still
hallucinates to SPEWS being alive!) are gonna be (legally) toast...
Just what you all deserve. Enjoy your time in HELL, my darlings!
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
