|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Shmuel (Seymour J.) MetzShmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
Date: Mar 1, 2007 19:41
>*SIGH*
Indeed ;-)
>How do you argue in state court that Federal Court is the 'proper
>venue' for the issue and _THEN_ claim that the Federal court does
>not have jurisdiction -- given that _you_ requested it be
>transferred to THAT court?
Why not ask someone who argued to that effect? I didn't. Read what I
wrote. The Federal courts are the proper venue for determining
jurisdiction. It was improper for the judge to proceed to trial
without first holding hearings on the issue of jurisdiction. You are
conflating two very different issues.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, truly insane Spews puppet
< http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive
E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact
me. Do not reply to spamtrap@ library.lspace.org
|
| |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Shmuel (Seymour J.) MetzShmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
Date: Mar 1, 2007 19:24
In newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>, on
02/28/2007
at 06:42 PM, DLU justthe.net> said:
>Judges are not defendant friendly and DAs get elected based on their
>record of convicting criminals.
No. DA's get elected based on their record of convicting accused,
whether they are actually criminals or not. The convictions sometimes
involve criminal actions byu the DA.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, truly insane Spews puppet
< http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive
E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact
me. Do not reply to spamtrap@ library.lspace.org
|
| |
|
| |
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr.Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr.
Date: Mar 1, 2007 16:36
Bruce Barnett wrote:
> Aatu Koskensilta writes:
> >> Archie Plutonium at least is alive and kicking, last I checked, promoting
>> his wonderful new theories. You might find more relevant information about
>> me by googling for "Aatu-Koskensilta" in the news, though I can't quite
>> fathom why you'd be interested in my humble chimney sweep person.
Results 1 - 10 of about 13,400 for Aatu-Koskensilta.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackListsE-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
Date: Mar 1, 2007 16:32
Herb Oxley wrote:
> Should the SBL data feeds become unavailable to USA
> users, watch more sites in the USA move to
> "Trusted Sender" that is where email from strangers
> is either rejected or moved to a "third class" folder
> and only sites which establish a trust relationship
> with each other will deliver to Inbox.
In order for "the SBL data feeds become unavailable to USA
users", SpamHuas would have do (try) that from their end,
or SpamHuas (at least the SBL) would have to go away;
"The US" is no more capable of controlling internet
traffic / content, than China is (they try some).
--
E-Mail Sent to this address Anitech-Systems.com>
will be added to the BlackLists.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author:
Date: Mar 1, 2007 16:25
> Archie Plutonium at least is alive and kicking, last I checked, promoting
> his wonderful new theories. You might find more relevant information about
> me by googling for "Aatu-Koskensilta" in the news, though I can't quite
> fathom why you'd be interested in my humble chimney sweep person.
--
Sending unsolicited commercial e-mail to this account incurs a fee of
$500 per message, and acknowledges the legality of this contract.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: No 33 SecretaryNo 33 Secretary
Date: Mar 1, 2007 16:02
"Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr." cox.net> wrote in
news:l8IFh.31549$OY.29401@newsfe20.lga:
> No 33 Secretary wrote:
>> "Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr." cox.net> wrote in
>> news:zCHFh.31546$OY.27776@newsfe20.lga:
>> >>> No 33 Secretary wrote:
>>>> Steve Linford spamhaus.org> wrote in
>>>> news:linford-E7DFAB.09303301032007@news.supernews.com:
>>>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>> Etaoin Shrdlu gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Le 28 Feb 2007, Steve Linford spamhaus.org> a
>>>>>>
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Herb OxleyHerb Oxley
Date: Mar 1, 2007 15:43
Quaestor wrote:
> RadicalModerate wrote:
> Actually there is. Otherwise, SPEWS would have ceased operation in 2003.
I was under the impression that the attacks in 2003 were largely SYN-floods
which are defensible (think "Melior").
As far as I can see about all one can do against a widely distributed WGET
(leech) attack is put the server on an hourly bandwidth ration (both data
volume and bps), set DNS no-cache and/or minimum TTL so the data can be
quickly moved from network to network to spread out the load and a temp.
blackhole for concentrations of DDoS clients such as the major consumer
broadband nets.
--
The published From: address is a trap.
Take my first initial and last name
and look at the origin of this post.
if you really want to send me email.
Or request a private reply in the group.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Herb OxleyHerb Oxley
Date: Mar 1, 2007 15:28
DC Hart boulderpledge.org> wrote:
> I am not suggesting that he is infallible. I just think that the ad
> hominem attacks on Judge Kocoras are misguided if not
> counter-productive. The problem is THE SPAMMER - not the judge.
The problem is the irredeemably corrupt system in which the spammers
operate.
Personally I think the first lawyer Spamhaus had in this case messed up.
However this looks like both sides are trying to set precedents.
It is my hope Spamhaus.org gets to do that rather than their adversary.
Should the SBL data feeds become unavailable to USA users, watch more
sites in the USA move to "Trusted Sender" that is where email from strangers
is either rejected or moved to a "third class" folder and only sites which
establish a trust relationship with each other will deliver to Inbox.
--
The published From: address is a trap.
Take my first initial and last name
and look at the origin of this post.
if you really want to send me email.
Or request a private reply in the group.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Screwtape IIIScrewtape III
Date: Mar 1, 2007 14:26
So, did SORBS block one of a zillion phish that try to come in on a
daily basis, or did they block a legitimate Chase Bank message being
sent from bigfootinteractive.com?
03/01 17:17 Connection from 206.132.3.144
03/01 17:17 HELO bigfootinteractive.com
03/01 17:17 MAIL FROM: email.chase.com>
03/01 17:17 Host 206.132.3.144 blocked by SORBS - message rejected.
03/01 17:17 QUIT
03/01 17:17 Connection closed with 206.132.3.144, 2 sec. elapsed.
--
Email is NOT a reliable means of communication.
|
| |
|
2 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
