Re: UCEPROTECT - I am listed again - why?         


Author: jlooney
Date: Apr 24, 2008 04:20

Hello Claus,

Well I didn't request being removed, I requested knowing why I was
listed in the first place. In fact, the exact message I put in the
contact form was the exact message I used in this news group:

"We previously (August 2007) got listed in your database, and Claus
helped us figure out the problem - which we fixed. Now we are on your
list again (ip 207.65.84.139). Can you please tell us the reason we
are listed? Our server had disk failure last night, and I do not have
access to the logs anymore. "

As for being listed, it is removed because I paid the 50 Euros your
company asks for quick delisting. I had to, because my clients were
getting very angry about not being able to send email. I still have no
idea why our server was listed, could you please check your logs to
see why it was listed so I can fix whatever the problem was?

Thank you,
Jim

On Apr 23, 11:09 pm, use-reply-to-mail...@remove-this.com (Claus v.
Wolfhausen) wrote:
> In article f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
> jrloo...@gmail.com says...
>
>
>
>>Hello,
>>We previously (August 2007) got listed in your database, and Claus
>>helped us figure out the problem - which we fixed. Now we are on your
>>list again (ip 207.65.84.139). Can you please tell us the reason we
>>are listed? Our server had disk failure last night, and I do not have
>>access to the logs anymore.
>
> At this time there is no listing so whatever it was it must have happened more
> than 7 days ago.
>
> http://www.uceprotect.net/en/rblcheck.php?ipr=207.65.84.139
>
>>Also, we tried to use your Contact form and it says "Your Messages was
>>NOT delivered" - I think something is wrong with the form.
>
> No that contact-form reads and tries to "understand" what you want to do.
> If it comes to the conclusion that what you write is a removal request,
> then it refuses to accept the message and gives you hints what to do.
>
> Reason for this is simple:
>
> We don't take removal requests here at UCEPROTECT, but we would get up to 500
> messages per day such as: "please remove 1.2.3.4 we don't spam"
>
> We have stated at our website that there is no need to request removal.
> Listed IP's do automatically expire if they don't emitt spam for 7 days.
> People which do not want to wait for expiration can expressdelist.
>
> But you guess it:
> People are to lazy to read or some even think they could get an exception.
> That's futile here. We never make exceptions.
>
> Therfore we had to programm an "intelligent" contact-form to prevent those
> lusers are wasting our time.
>
> --
> Claus von Wolfhausen
> UCEPROTECT-Projektleitunghttp://www.uceprotect.net
>
> --
> Comments posted to news.admin.net-abuse.blocklisting
> are solely the responsibility of their author. Please
> read the news.admin.net-abuse.blocklisting FAQ at
> http://www.blocklisting.com/faq.htmlbefore posting.

--
Comments posted to news.admin.net-abuse.blocklisting
are solely the responsibility of their author. Please
read the news.admin.net-abuse.blocklisting FAQ at
http://www.blocklisting.com/faq.html before posting.
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!