|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: vsxovsxo Date: Nov 18, 2006 08:20
Someone suggested I post the reply I got from the odn.ad.jp abuse desk
in reaction to quite a few complaints about a spamvertised IP in their
netblock. Here it is.
X-Gmail-Received: deb18ca2b82b003f4b346810232df071647372cb
Delivered-To: rmvsxop@ gmail.com
Received: by 10.70.13.17 with SMTP id 17cs239551wxm;
Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:39:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by...
|
| Show full article (2.62Kb) |
|
| | 6 Comments |
|
|
Author: QuaestorQuaestor Date: Nov 18, 2006 09:28
vsxo wrote:
>Dear Sir or Madam:
>
>Thank you for contacting ODN.
>
>We received your report about SPAM/UCE. But, unfortunately,
>we don't warn an advertising providers when the SPAM/UCE
>contains the URL of his/her site belonging to our network.
>
>
So they regard the fact that they don't listwash as a good thing, or
bad? *confused*
>Still, as you have assumed, we appreciate your report.
>
>
Why?
>Thank you very much for supplying us with this information.
>
>
|
| Show full article (0.72Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Date: Nov 18, 2006 10:08
Quaestor writes:
> So they regard the fact that they don't listwash as a good thing, or
> bad? *confused*
Not only do they not listwash, they seem to consider spamvertising
your own site an OK thing to do.
--
Atro Tossavainen (Mr.) / The Institute of Biotechnology at
Systems Analyst, Techno-Amish & / the University of Helsinki, Finland,
+358-9-19158939 UNIX Dinosaur / employs me, but my opinions are my own.
< URL : http : / / www . helsinki . fi / %%7E atossava / > NO FILE ATTACHMENTS
|
| |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: vsxovsxo Date: Nov 20, 2006 14:44
Well, I thought that for once, I had enough evidence for MAPS to
finally prove themselves, and list an IP. Complaints, and a final
answer stating that no action would be taken.
Boy was I wrong.
They've proven themselves all right... but in the wrong way.
X-Gmail-Received: 6093b85b5265f9754c259c46c8ab8fbbcf2c03de
Delivered-To: rmvsxop@ gmail.com
Received: by 10.70.13.17 with SMTP id 17cs534817wxm;
Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:38:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by...
|
| Show full article (4.78Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: glgxgglgxg Date: Nov 20, 2006 18:13
Atro Tossavainen wrote:
> Quaestor writes:
>
>> So they regard the fact that they don't listwash as a good thing, or
>> bad? *confused*
>
> Not only do they not listwash, they seem to consider spamvertising
> your own site an OK thing to do.
>
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Nov 20, 2006 23:52
Quaestor wrote:
> vsxo wrote:
>
>>Well, I thought that for once, I had enough evidence for MAPS to
>>finally prove themselves, and list an IP. Complaints, and a final
>>answer stating that no action would be taken.
>>
>>Boy was I wrong.
>>
>>They've proven themselves all right... but in the wrong way.
>
> Nothing new there. That was exactly what I got back every time I sent
> them anything. I finally figured out, MAPS stands for Might As well
> Process it your Self. I could block more spam by throwing a rag against
> a wall.
How long do you find wet rags stick to the wall? I'm having trouble in
that mine just fall to the floor right away, so I guess I need to work
on just the right amount of water, eh? ;-D
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Nov 21, 2006 09:06
Quaestor wrote:
> kingpin+nntp@lumbercartel.ca wrote:
>>Quaestor wrote:
[snIP]
>>>Nothing new there. That was exactly what I got back every time I sent
>>>them anything. I finally figured out, MAPS stands for Might As well
>>>Process it your Self. I could block more spam by throwing a rag against
>>>a wall.
>>
>>How long do you find wet rags stick to the wall? I'm having trouble in
>>that mine just fall to the floor right away, so I guess I need to work
>>on just the right amount of water, eh? ;-D
>
> They stick better if soaked in spammer blood. DO use a rubber glove,
> though.
Ah, no wonder it's not working for me! I'm not using liquids that come
from spammers
-- I don't have the proper facilities to handle anything
as horrible as toxic waste. Wow, you're a real credit to the war
against spam, my friend; I don't envy you for your efforts.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
