Re: For the record: NANB moderators *are* personally biased
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
news.admin.net-abuse.email only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

news.admin.net-abuse.email Profile…
 Up
Re: For the record: NANB moderators *are* personally biased         


Author: huey.callison
Date: Dec 20, 2006 05:02

Mark Ferguson whew.com> wrote:
> huey.callison@gmail.com wrote:
>> Mark Ferguson whew.com> wrote:
>>> Let us get this over with Huey, define intelligence.
>> Good of you to admit that you couldn't answer the question put to
>> you back in Message-ID: speakeasy.net> on
>> 26 Sep 05, which, since you've already demonstrated an inability
>> to use Google to discover simple truths, looked like this:
> Wow, you interpret "define intelligence" as "I could not answer the
> question".

No, I interpret the fact that you diddn't actually answer the question
as pretty strongly suggesting the possibility that you couldn't answer
the question.
Show full article (17.12Kb)
3 Comments
Re: For the record: NANB moderators *are* personally biased         


Author: Mark Ferguson
Date: Dec 20, 2006 06:05

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 22:02:37 -0600, huey.callison@gmail.com wrote:
>Mark Ferguson whew.com> wrote:
>> huey.callison@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Mark Ferguson whew.com> wrote:
>>>> Let us get this over with Huey, define intelligence.
>>> Good of you to admit that you couldn't answer the question put to
>>> you back in Message-ID: speakeasy.net>

Doesn't come up in my newsreader.
>on
>>> 26 Sep 05, which, since you've already demonstrated an inability
>>> to use Google to discover simple truths, looked like this:
>> Wow, you interpret "define intelligence" as "I could not answer the
>> question".
>
>No, I interpret the fact that you diddn't actually answer the question
>as pretty strongly suggesting the possibility that you couldn't answer
>the question.

Another wrong assumption but who's counting.
>>> Define 'intelligence', and some sort of metric for it. You may
>>> want to consider something testable, like IQ score or college
>>> boards, something more slanted towards the performance...
Show full article (19.87Kb)
1 Comment
Re: For the record: NANB moderators *are* personally biased         


Author: Gary L. Burnore
Date: Dec 20, 2006 12:56

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 21:05:35 -0800, Markthe boyfucker Ferguson
whew.com> wrote:
>
>> Your job, on the other hand, is moving
>>appliances.
>
>No, my job was installing them as well as transporting them and
>delivering them.

You're a delivery boy, boyfucker? Hahahaha.
>Snicker... Install a dishwasher and get back to me. Better yet
>install a built in and tell me how you did it.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Pretty much
anyone can install a dishwasher, boyfucker. That's why drop outs take
jobs doing it. What amaroon.
>And education does not equal intelligence. There ya have it.

Education does equal a commitment to follow through, the ability to
reason and many other things. All qualities you don't posess,
boyfucker.
>In math test I usually scored around ninety five percent.
Show full article (2.92Kb)
no comments
Re: For the record: NANB moderators *are* personally biased         


Author: Kevin S. Wilson
Date: Dec 20, 2006 17:30

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 22:02:37 -0600, huey.callison@gmail.com wrote:
>Yes, yes, I'm sure that dead retards are smiling down on you from
>heaven, saying "Look! There's a retard who survived! AND he can
>install appliances!", but I fail to see how any of that demonstrates
>intelligence, much less an intelligence that even so much as
>approaches the level of anybody else in this newsgroup - even the ones
>like this n00b 'Skua', who is apparently only slightly less stupid
>than you.

I thought that 'Skua' was just another morph of the morphon "Sulu." If
true, that in no way detracts from your argument that 'Skua' is only
slightly less stupid than Exhibit Duh here.
no comments