|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: SpaceMan SpiffSpaceMan Spiff Date: Jan 21, 2007 21:38
excerpt from -
http://www.al.com/printer/printer.ssf?/base/news/1169288539262650.xml&coll=2
---------------
On that post, titled "Junk Controversy, Not Junk Science," Cullen
supported the theory that increases in levels of gases, particularly
carbon dioxide, in the atmosphere have led to global warming, and she
challenged meteorologists who say it is the result of cyclical weather
patterns.
"If a meteorologist can't speak to the fundamental science of climate
change, then maybe the (American Meteorological Society) shouldn't give
them a Seal of Approval," Cullen wrote.
Spann fired off his response in a blog he posted before his 6 p.m.
weather forecast Thursday on ABC 33/40. It was picked up by The Drudge
Report three hours later.
"Well, well," Spann wrote on his blog. "Some `climate expert' on `The
Weather Channel' wants to take away AMS certification from those of us
who believe the recent `global warming' is a natural process. So much
for `tolerance,' huh?
|
| Show full article (2.09Kb) |
|
| | 6 Comments |
|
|
Author: Stupendous ManStupendous Man Date: Jan 22, 2007 10:00
Boston Blackie wrote:
> On 2007-01-21 23:38:54 -0600, SpaceMan Spiff onthemoon.org> said:>>> Onthatpost,titled"JunkControversy,NotJunkScience,"Cullensupportedthetheorythatincreasesinlevelsofgases,particularlycarbondioxide,intheatmospherehaveledtoglobalwarming,andshechallengedmeteorologistswhosayitistheresultofcyclicalweatherpatterns."Ifameteorologistcan'tspeaktothefundamentalscienceofclimatechange,thenmaybethe(AmericanMeteorologicalSociety)shouldn'tgivethemaSealofApproval,"Cullenwrote.Spannfiredoffhisresponseinabloghepostedbeforehis6p.m.weatherforecastThursdayonABC33/40.ItwaspickedupbyTheDrudgeReportthreehourslater."Well,well,"Spannwroteonhisblog."Some`climateexpert'on`TheWeatherChannel'wantstotakeawayAMScertificationfromthoseofuswhobelievetherecent`globalwarming'isanaturalprocess.Somuchfor`tolerance,'huh?"Ihavebeeninoperationalmeteorologysince1978,andIknowdozensanddozensofbroadcastmeteorologistsalloverthecountry....IdonotknowofasingleTVmeteorologistwhobuysintotheman-madeglobal-warminghype.Iknowthereareafewoutthere,butIcan'tfindthem."Cullen,whowasnotavailablefor
commentFridayafternoon,hassincepostedafollow-upblogiteminwhichshewrotethatshedidnotwanttostiflethedebateoverglobalwarming."I'vereadallyourcommentssayingIwanttosilencemeteorologistswhoareskepticalofthescienceofglobalwarming,"shewrote."Thatisnottrue...."ManyofyouhaveaccusedmeandTheWeatherChanneloftakingapoliticalpositiononglobalwarming.Thatisnotourintention."300andcounting:AsoflateFridayafternoon,Spannreportedmorethan300responsestohiscommentsonhisblog, whichcanbefoundatwww.jamesspann.com.About80percentofthosesupportedwhathewrote,Spannsaid...`GeneralHospital'foratornadowarning. >>>
>
> Of
>>>
> all the 'spurts weighing in on this issue, I'd personally put the
> expertise and competence of teevee weathermen dead last, Georg.
>
> bb
>
Why Elliot, I mean bb, how is one TV Weatherman from the Weather Channel
(a TV weatherperson) superior to another with the same degree from
another Channel? But did you notice how Cullen changed her view from: ...
|
| Show full article (4.64Kb) |
|
| | 5 Comments |
|
|
Author: Boston BlackieBoston Blackie Date: Jan 22, 2007 10:12
On 2007-01-22 12:00:16 -0600, Stupendous Man said:
> Boston Blackie wrote:
>> On 2007-01-21 23:38:54 -0600, SpaceMan Spiff onthemoon.org> said:
|
| Show full article (2.26Kb) |
| 4 Comments |
|
|
Author: Stupendous ManStupendous Man Date: Jan 22, 2007 10:32
Boston Blackie wrote:
> On 2007-01-22 12:00:16 -0600, Stupendous Man said:
>
>> Boston Blackie wrote:
>>> On 2007-01-21 23:38:54 -0600, SpaceMan Spiff onthemoon.org>
>>> said:>>>>> Onthatpost,titled"JunkControversy,NotJunkScience,"Cullensupportedthetheorythatincreasesinlevelsofgases,particularlycarbondioxide,intheatmospherehaveledtoglobalwarming,andshechallengedmeteorologistswhosayitistheresultofcyclicalweatherpatterns."Ifameteorologistcan'tspeaktothefundamentalscienceofclimatechange,thenmaybethe(AmericanMeteorologicalSociety)shouldn'tgivethemaSealofApproval,"Cullenwrote.Spannfiredoffhisresponseinabloghepostedbeforehis6p.m.weatherforecastThursdayonABC33/40.ItwaspickedupbyTheDrudgeReportthreehourslater."Well,well,"Spannwroteonhisblog."Some`climateexpert'on`TheWeatherChannel'wantstotakeawayAMScertificationfromthoseofuswhobelievetherecent`globalwarming'isanaturalprocess.Somuchfor`tolerance,'huh?"Ihavebeeninoperationalmeteorologysince1978,andIknowdozensanddozensofbroadcastmeteorologistsalloverthecountry....IdonotknowofasingleTVmeteorologistwhobuysintotheman-madeglobal-warminghype.Iknowthereareafewoutthere,butIcan'tfindthem."Cullen,whowasnotavailablef
or
>>>>>
> commentFridayafternoon,hassincepostedafollow-upblogiteminwhichshewrotethatshedidnotwanttostiflethedebateoverglobalwarming."I'vereadallyourcommentssayingIwanttosilencemeteorologistswhoareskepticalofthescienceofglobalwarming,"shewrote."Thatisnottrue...."ManyofyouhaveaccusedmeandTheWeatherChanneloftakingapoliticalpositiononglobalwarming.Thatisnotourintention."300andcounting:AsoflateFridayafternoon,Spannreportedmorethan300responsestohiscommentsonhisblog, whichcanbefoundatwww.jamesspann.com.About80percentofthosesupportedwhathewrote,Spannsaid...`GeneralHospital'foratornadowarning.
>
>
>
> Of
>
> all ...
|
| Show full article (3.28Kb) |
| 3 Comments |
|
|
Author: MrWonderfulMrWonderful Date: Jan 22, 2007 11:18
Stupendous Man wrote:
> Now suppose one of these days, I am able to get down to Boscoes the next
> time you all meet there, and let's suppose you and I are introduced
> officially, and I find that in spite of our differences, I really like
> ya!
> Stupendous Man
>> I am a member of the League of Stupendous Gentlemen! ;)
If by then you stop supporting the highly homo, but hypocritical,
Corruptubucuns, perhaps you could ask him to marry you. That's just one
thing you could do if you find out you like him.
: ) Lala
|
| |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: Stupendous ManStupendous Man Date: Jan 22, 2007 11:24
MrWonderful wrote:
> Stupendous Man wrote:
>
>> Now suppose one of these days, I am able to get down to Boscoes the next
>> time you all meet there, and let's suppose you and I are introduced
>> officially, and I find that in spite of our differences, I really like
>> ya!
>> Stupendous Man
>>> I am a member of the League of Stupendous Gentlemen! ;)
>
> If by then you stop supporting the highly homo, but hypocritical,
> Corruptubucuns, perhaps you could ask him to marry you. That's just one
> thing you could do if you find out you like him.
> : ) Lala
>
I was thinking along the lines of brotherly Christian fellowship in a
friendship, not perversion! More information than I wanted to know Ktreemn!
Stupendous Man
http://www.myspace.com/stupendousleague
|
| Show full article (0.89Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
