Group: nashville.general · Group Profile
Author: Jean SmithJean Smith Date: Sep 3, 2008 09:49
In article earthlink.com>,
"David Moffitt" stomping-leftist-twits.org> wrote:
> "Kent Finnell" bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> news:DGvvk.21453$De7.6672@bignews7.bellsouth.net...
> | "David Moffitt" stomping-leftist-twits.org> wrote
> | in message
> | news:OvOdnVCHTJqQkiPVnZ2dnUVZ_sDinZ2d@earthlink.com...
> | >
> | > "Boston Blackie (happily ignored by KD the Merciless!)"
> | > mail.com>
> | > wrote in message
> | > news:2008090207080975249-bblackie@mailcom...
> | > | On 2008-09-02 06:00:28 -0500, "Kent Finnell"
> | > bellsouth.net>
> | > said:
> | > |
> | > | > A better question might be what would YOU do
> | > | > if approached by 3 goblins?
> | > |
> | > | Rain down flaming death from my two six-shooters, a few
> | > hand grenades
> | > | and a satchel charge.
> | >
> | > What type of satchel charge would you use?
> | >
> | > |
> | > | All within my rights to own and bear, right?
> | >
> | > Contrary to the cold fear of the leftist. Yes!
> |
> | And I believe you to be wrong, David. Personal arms, like
> | handguns, rifles and shotguns, perhaps even knives, swords,
> | and dirks (but not according to Tennessee law) are protected
> | constitutionally. Grenades and satchel charges are
> | "unusual" weapons, a class that Scalia said could be banned.
> | As I pointed out to jak, the ruling was narrow, not as
> | narrow as the NRA originally feared, but broader than the
> | Brady Bunch had hoped for. Grenades and satchel charges are
> | "destructive devices", not personal arms, IMO.
>
> They could be banned but are not at present as you pointed out.
>
> "My sense of purpose is gone! I have no idea who I AM!"
> "Oh, my God... You've.. You've turned him into a DEMOCRAT!" -- Doonesbury
> What's a terrorist to do without bombs?
| 
