|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Group: nashville.general · Group Profile
Author: David MoffittDavid Moffitt Date: Sep 3, 2008 08:35
"Kent Finnell" bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:DGvvk.21453$De7.6672@bignews7.bellsouth.net...
| "David Moffitt" stomping-leftist-twits.org> wrote
| in message
| news:OvOdnVCHTJqQkiPVnZ2dnUVZ_sDinZ2d@earthlink.com...
| >
| > "Boston Blackie (happily ignored by KD the Merciless!)"
| > mail.com>
| > wrote in message
| > news:2008090207080975249-bblackie@mailcom...
| > | On 2008-09-02 06:00:28 -0500, "Kent Finnell"
| > bellsouth.net>
| > said:
| > |
| > | > A better question might be what would YOU do
| > | > if approached by 3 goblins?
| > |
| > | Rain down flaming death from my two six-shooters, a few
| > hand grenades
| > | and a satchel charge.
| >
| > What type of satchel charge would you use?
| >
| > |
| > | All within my rights to own and bear, right?
| >
| > Contrary to the cold fear of the leftist. Yes!
|
| And I believe you to be wrong, David. Personal arms, like
| handguns, rifles and shotguns, perhaps even knives, swords,
| and dirks (but not according to Tennessee law) are protected
| constitutionally. Grenades and satchel charges are
| "unusual" weapons, a class that Scalia said could be banned.
| As I pointed out to jak, the ruling was narrow, not as
| narrow as the NRA originally feared, but broader than the
| Brady Bunch had hoped for. Grenades and satchel charges are
| "destructive devices", not personal arms, IMO.
They could be banned but are not at present as you pointed out.
"My sense of purpose is gone! I have no idea who I AM!"
"Oh, my God... You've.. You've turned him into a DEMOCRAT!" -- Doonesbury
| >
|
| --
| Security, like liberty, has to be won and re-won many times
| ...
| Linus from Charles Schulz's Peanuts 1958
|
| From the Music City USA
| Kent Finnell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
