Kent Finnell wrote:
> "Boston Blackie (Read only 0.01%% by KD the Merciless!)"
>
mail.com> wrote in message
> news:2008040521035616807-bblackie@mailcom...>> On 2008-04-05 16:32:20 -0500, "Kent Finnell"
>>
bellsouth.net> said:
>>>>> "Boston Blackie (Read only 0.01%% by KD the Merciless!)"
>>>
mail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:2008040516235916807-bblackie@mailcom...>>>> On 2008-04-05 14:25:45 -0500, "Kent Finnell"
>>>>
bellsouth.net> said:
>>>>>>>>> The biological fact is that all life forms are bred in
>>>>> some
>>>>> manner or the other.
>>>> What, now you don't believe in Jesus?
>>> He was born of woman, wasn't He? But you're off-topic
>>> ...
>>> typical of the lying self-made bastard.
>> according to Scripture, he had no human father, so he was
>> not 'bred.'
>>
>> Look it up, it was in all the papers.
>
> No it wasn't because a) there were no papers at the time and
> b) accounts of His birth were written well after His death
> and resurrection. Even the accounts of His birth are
> inconsistent in the Gospels.
>
Maybe he meant 'papyrus'. In any case, they repeat it at least every
December...and have for the last couple thousand years.
BTW, how does one become 'ill-bred' anyway? I'm a little surprised as
the classism you perpetuate. (Well, actually I'm not.) Isn't this
America, where anybody--regardless of their 'breeding'--can succeed by
hard work? What's the more important measure of a person...who one is,
or who was one's father/mother?
> Now if you want to discuss religion, I suggest that you take
> your lying ass to another group.
Just shut up, Kent. You're increasingly irrelevant and childish. Your
(well bred?) mother would be ashamed....
jak
