Ethics question!
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
nashville.general only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

nashville.general Profile…
 Up
Ethics question!         


Author: maxo
Date: Aug 2, 2007 13:13

What should I do?

Rite Aid (Eckerd) got my dog's prescription wrong and put 30 $5 pills
in the order, so I asked if I could just get 10 and it was no problem.
Get home and see that the lady never took out twenty of the tablets--
so I've got $100 worth of meds that I didn't pay for.

I usually am not a fan of taking advantage of a mistake, as somebody
usually has to answer for it. If the checker at Hills gives me too
much money back, I'll go back to the store if I discover it or if a
local restaurant forgets to charge for something, I'll let them know--
and often they're so surprised that they end up comping it anyway.

But, in this case, I'm pretty sure that they can't restock the pills
after they've been out of the store, for safety reasons. So the only
thing I'd be doing is being honest for honesty's sake, and the pills
would be discarded? Or can pharmacists get credit for "spoiled" stock?

Eckerd has driven me nuts with the incompetence of the Eastland stor
--
so part of me thinks that it's their comeuppance--but this occurred at
Trinity Lane location, which is expertly staffed. Hmmm, if it had been
just a couple bucks, I'd have let the Big Faceless Corporation eat it,
but $100?
65 Comments
Re: Ethics question!         


Author: MrWonderful
Date: Aug 2, 2007 13:53

On Aug 2, 3:13?pm, maxo gmail.com> wrote:
> What should I do?
>
> Rite Aid (Eckerd) got my dog's prescription wrong and put 30 $5 pills
> in the order, so I asked if I could just get 10 and it was no problem.
> Get home and see that the lady never took out twenty of the tablets--
> so I've got $100 worth of meds that I didn't pay for.
>
> I usually am not a fan of taking advantage of a mistake, as somebody
> usually has to answer for it. If the checker at Hills gives me too
> much money back, I'll go back to the store if I discover it or if a
> local restaurant forgets to charge for something, I'll let them know--
> and often they're so surprised that they end up comping it anyway.
>
> But, in this case, I'm pretty sure that they can't restock the pills
> after they've been out of the store, for safety reasons. So the only
> thing I'd be doing is being honest for honesty's sake, and the pills
> would be discarded? Or can pharmacists get credit for "spoiled" stock?
>
> Eckerd has driven me nuts with the incompetence of the Eastland store-- ...
Show full article (1.39Kb)
no comments
Re: Ethics question!         


Author: Boston Blackie (PA Robert Black, or is it the other way 'round?)
Date: Aug 2, 2007 15:40

On 2007-08-02 15:13:41 -0500, maxo gmail.com> said:
> What should I do?
>
> Rite Aid (Eckerd) got my dog's prescription wrong and put 30 $5 pills
> in the order, so I asked if I could just get 10 and it was no problem.
> Get home and see that the lady...
Show full article (1.46Kb)
no comments
Re: Ethics question!         


Author: maxo
Date: Aug 2, 2007 15:59

On Aug 2, 5:40 pm, Boston Blackie (PA Robert Black, or is it the other
way 'round?) mail.com> wrote:
>
> Remember, it's Eckerd. The store that removed "The Child's Garden of
> Grass" from their book sales area in the 60s.
>
> Never forget, never forgive.

Fuck the Man, then!
no comments
Re: Ethics question!         


Author: KD
Date: Aug 2, 2007 16:23

I'd report the extra pills to Eckerd and ask what they want to do.

I once purchased two $200 identical items at the Bellevue Sam's. I
obviously wasn't paying close attention when I swiped my debit to pay,
because I found out a day or two later that they had only charged me
for one. I returned to Sam's with my receipt and paid for the other
one.

It's just the right thing to do. Regardless, in the scheme of your
life, is it worth feeling like a thief for this small monetary
advantage? It wouldn't for my life.

-KD
no comments
Re: Ethics question!         


Author: Kent Finnell
Date: Aug 2, 2007 17:40

"Boston Blackie (PA Robert Black, or is it the other way 'round?)"
mail.com> wrote in message
news:2007080217403750073-bblackie@mailcom...
> On 2007-08-02 15:13:41 -0500, maxo gmail.com> said:
>
>> What should I do?
>>
>> Rite Aid (Eckerd) got my dog's prescription wrong and put 30 $5 pills
>> in the order, so I asked if I could just get 10 and it was no problem.
>> Get home and see that the lady never took out twenty of the tablets--
>> so I've got $100 worth of meds that I didn't pay for.
>>
>> I usually am not a fan of taking advantage of a mistake, as somebody
>> usually has to answer for it. If the checker at Hills gives me too
>> much money back, I'll go back to the store if I discover it or if a
>> local restaurant forgets to charge for something, I'll let them know--
>> and often they're so surprised that they end up comping it anyway.
>>
>> But, in this case, I'm pretty sure that they can't restock the pills
>> after they've been out of the store, for safety reasons. So the only ...
Show full article (1.72Kb)
no comments
Re: Ethics question!         


Author: maxo
Date: Aug 2, 2007 20:01

On Aug 2, 6:23 pm, KD gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd report the extra pills to Eckerd and ask what they want to do.
>
> I once purchased two $200 identical items at the Bellevue Sam's. I
> obviously wasn't paying close attention when I swiped my debit to pay,
> because I found out a day or two later that they had only charged me
> for one. I returned to Sam's with my receipt and paid for the other
> one.

I'd not have been so honest considering that nobody's drawer would be
short, and it was not my mistake, yet it would cost me time and money
to make right. As the time and money would be about equal, I'd have
kept the item. But I am slightly evil, so fair game.
>
> It's just the right thing to do. Regardless, in the scheme of your
> life, is it worth feeling like a thief for this small monetary
> advantage? It wouldn't for my life.
>
Show full article (1.39Kb)
3 Comments
Re: Ethics question!         


Author: JG
Date: Aug 2, 2007 20:38

On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 03:01:49 -0000, maxo gmail.com> wrote:
>wasted hours of my time screwing up 'scripts.

I will no longer do business with Walgreens because their
indifference and incompetence at filling prescriptions just finally
became too insulting. Of course no one is any better, at least that
I've found. But I switched to a mail order deal where I can fill my
couple of prescriptions quarterly instead of monthly, on the phone
instead of physically having to confront the idiots.

As to the ethics, I tend to agree with KD, at least at the bottom
line. For example, the thing that pretty much broke the camel's back
for me with Walgreens was when they gave me someone else's
prescription after making me come back to pick up the rest of my own
prescription they had been unable to fill in one visit for about the
6th month in a row (among various other affronts).
Show full article (2.03Kb)
no comments
Re: Ethics question!         


Author: KD
Date: Aug 2, 2007 21:07

On Aug 2, 10:01 pm, maxo gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd not have been so honest considering that nobody's drawer would be
> short, and it was not my mistake, yet it would cost me time and money
> to make right.

Not true. When inventory is short, someone pays. When I returned to
Sam's to make things right, the manager could not thank me enough. He
said when inventory comes up short, he is called on the carpet to
answer for it,

Cost you time and money to make it right? Give me a break. That's
called rationalizing and justifying one's bad behavior.
> I'm not a thief, I'm the recipient of a mistake's spoils.

The law doesn't see it that way. Ask an attorney.
>I've been
> overcharged and ripped off enough

This is part of every thief's justification for his dishonest
behavior. I've been ripped off, too, but that doesn't justify me
ripping off someone else.
> they've wasted hours of my time screwing up 'scripts.
Show full article (2.45Kb)
no comments
Re: Ethics question!         


Author: maxo
Date: Aug 2, 2007 21:52

On Aug 2, 11:07 pm, KD gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 2, 10:01 pm, maxo gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'd not have been so honest considering that nobody's drawer would be
>> short, and it was not my mistake, yet it would cost me time and money
>> to make right.
>
> Not true. When inventory is short, someone pays.

Yes, the investor. Boo hoo.
> When I returned to
> Sam's to make things right, the manager could not thank me enough. He
> said when inventory comes up short, he is called on the carpet to
> answer for it,
>
> Cost you time and money to make it right? Give me a break. That's
> called rationalizing and justifying one's bad behavior.
>

So I should spend $100 of my time to remedy a $100 fuckup? For big
business? Fuck that.
Show full article (2.14Kb)
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7