|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: BobBob Date: Jul 18, 2008 16:27
http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/7/15/214110/823
"Here's the joke in question from 1986:
Did you hear the one about the woman who is attacked on the street by a
gorilla, beaten senseless, raped repeatedly and left to die? When she
finally regains consciousness and tries to speak, her doctor leans over to
hear her sigh contently and to feebly ask, `Where is that marvelous ape?'
The MEDIA's complicity in McCain's sexism is absolutely horrendous. The bile
that comes out of this man's mouth, and the media has yet to cover one bit
of it. Even THE MCLAUGHLIN GROUP of all people, including mclaughlin himself
thinks McCain is the media darling. For god's sake, he had a BBQ with the
Associated Press, who we've just found has been in very friendly
correspondence with Karl Rove, telling him "Keep up the fight"! And Obama
didnt get any standing ovation at the AP conference invitation, in fact, the
presenter called him "Osama" and it just looked so intentional. McCain
meanwhile got a minutes-long standing ovation, and Liz Sidoti of the AP
brought him donuts "with [his] favorite, sprinkles".
..he referred to the [retirement community] Leisure World as Seizure World..
|
| Show full article (1.60Kb) |
|
| | 28 Comments |
|
  |
Author: David MoffittDavid Moffitt Date: Jul 18, 2008 17:46
"Bob" trix.net> wrote in message
news:mqqdnV5caepeuxzVnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@earthlink.com...
|
|
| http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/7/15/214110/823
|
| "Here's the joke in question from 1986:
|
| Did you hear the one about the woman who is attacked on the street by a
| gorilla, beaten senseless, raped repeatedly and left to die? When she
| finally regains consciousness and tries to speak, her doctor leans over to
| hear her sigh contently and to feebly ask, `Where is that marvelous ape?'
|
| The MEDIA's complicity in McCain's sexism is absolutely horrendous. The
bile
| that comes out of this man's mouth, and the media has yet to cover one bit
| of it. Even THE MCLAUGHLIN GROUP of all people, including mclaughlin
himself
| thinks McCain is the media darling. For god's sake, he had a BBQ with the
| Associated Press, who we've just found has been in very friendly ...
|
| Show full article (2.07Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: BobBob Date: Jul 19, 2008 07:28
"David Moffitt" :
>
> %%%%%%%% And the people love him. ":o)
>
There is something wonderful in seeing a wrong-headed majority assailed by
truth.
- John Kenneth Galbraith
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: FayeFaye Date: Jul 19, 2008 08:32
Bob wrote:
> There is something wonderful in seeing a wrong-headed majority assailed by
> truth.
>
> - John Kenneth Galbraith
And the truth is that the dems have been the majority party in
Congress for almost two years while the nation has gone into its
sharpest decline since the Great Depression. It is hard to imagine a
more ineffectual lot.
Faye
callin' 'em like I see 'em
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: BobBob Date: Jul 19, 2008 10:27
> Bob wrote:
>
>> There is something wonderful in seeing a wrong-headed majority assailed
>> by
>> truth.
>>
>> - John Kenneth Galbraith
>
> And the truth is that the dems have been the majority party in
> Congress for almost two years while the nation has gone into its
> sharpest decline since the Great Depression. It is hard to imagine a
> more ineffectual lot.
>
> Faye
> callin' 'em like I see 'em
>
|
| Show full article (1.88Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: MrWonderfulMrWonderful Date: Jul 19, 2008 11:22
On Jul 19, 10:32�am, Faye att.net> wrote:
> Bob wrote:
>> There is something wonderful in seeing a wrong-headed majority assailed by
>> truth.
>
>> �- John Kenneth Galbraith
>
> And the truth is that the dems have been the majority party in
> Congress for almost two years while the nation has gone into its
> sharpest decline since the Great Depression. �It is hard to imagine a
> more ineffectual lot.
>
> Faye
> callin' 'em like I see 'em
It's like expecting a hopeful fate after 777 feet of a 1000 foot fall.
: ) Lala
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: FayeFaye Date: Jul 19, 2008 20:33
Bob wrote:
> "Faye" att.net> wrote in message
> http://www.islandpacket.com/opinion/letters/story/553975.html
> "A July 8 letter blames the Democrats for inactivity. I believe the writer
> needs a civics lesson. The Democrats have 49 senators; two independents vote
> mostly Democratic. They might pass a bill, but Republican senators usually
> filibuster the effort. If legislation does get passed because a few
> Republicans see the light, our president threatens to veto the bill, which
> he has done 141 times. Before the 2006 election, Bush vetoed no bills
> because they came from the free-spending Republican House and Senate. After
> Democrats became the majority (although not veto-proof), Bush vetoed 11
> bills outright and pocket-vetoed others"..
Nobody cares how many storms you encounter at sea only whether or not
you bring the ship home safely.
Faye
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Doug Smith W9WIDoug Smith W9WI Date: Jul 20, 2008 06:48
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:32:47 -0700, Faye wrote:
> And the truth is that the dems have been the majority party in
> Congress for almost two years while the nation has gone into its
> sharpest decline since the Great Depression. It is hard to imagine a
> more ineffectual lot.
Unfortunately the math forces that. A 2/3 majority is necessary to
override a Presidential veto. So, 34 Senators & Bush or 146
Representatives & Bush are enough to kill a bill. The other 66 Senators
or 289 Representatives' votes don't count.
There are 199 Republicans in the House and 49 in the Senate.
So really, on anything where a serious change to Bush's policies is
necessary, Congress has two unpalatable choices:
- Go along with Bush, trying to get a few small bones thrown so you can
say you weren't 100%% ineffective.
- Keep passing bills Bush will veto, and be blamed for shutting down
government.
Too, Bush has had 12 years to ruin the country. The Democrats will need
more than two years to fix it.
|
| Show full article (1.24Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: MrWonderfulMrWonderful Date: Jul 20, 2008 09:59
On Jul 20, 8:48�am, Doug Smith W9WI wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:32:47 -0700, Faye wrote:
>> And the truth is that the dems have been the majority party in
>> Congress for almost two years while the nation has gone into its
>> sharpest decline since the Great Depression. �It is hard to imagine a
>> more ineffectual lot.
>
> Unfortunately the math forces that. �A 2/3 majority is necessary to
> override a Presidential veto. �So, 34 Senators & Bush or 146
> Representatives & Bush are enough to kill a bill. �The other 66 Senators
> or 289 Representatives' votes don't count.
>
> There are 199 Republicans in the House and 49 in the Senate. �
>
> So really, on anything where a serious change to Bush's policies is
> necessary, Congress has two unpalatable choices:
>
> - Go along with Bush, trying to get a few small bones thrown so you can
> say you weren't 100%% ineffective.
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.50Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: FayeFaye Date: Jul 20, 2008 21:44
Doug Smith W9WI wrote:
> Unfortunately the math forces that. A 2/3 majority is necessary to
> override a Presidential veto. So, 34 Senators & Bush or 146
> Representatives & Bush are enough to kill a bill. The other 66 Senators
> or 289 Representatives' votes don't count.
>
> There are 199 Republicans in the House and 49 in the Senate.
I understand the math. In the context Bob used the quote, it seemed
to me that he had forgotten which is the majority party.
> So really, on anything where a serious change to Bush's policies is
> necessary, Congress has two unpalatable choices:
>
> - Go along with Bush, trying to get a few small bones thrown so you can
> say you weren't 100%% ineffective.
>
> - Keep passing bills Bush will veto, and be blamed for shutting down
> government.
*Shut it down!* In a heartbeat.
|
| Show full article (1.66Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|