On 2008-09-20, Twibil
gmail.com> wrote:>> The one thing that government doesn't teach in the government's
>> schools is how the scam works.
>
> Yup. It's all a plot. How clever of you to have uncovered it.
LOL. I'm sorry your education is so lacking regarding the history behind
the government schools in the US. Maybe you should take the time to read
a couple of books on the subject. They are free on the net these days.
>> My knowledge isn't special nor did I claim it was. You however decided
>> to be insulting towards me but now you seem upset it came back at you.
> It didn't "come back at me", doofus. You put the gun to your own head
> in this discussion when you used the term "envirowhackos"; a label
> that told everyone quite clearly that (A) you had an agenda, and (B)
> what it was.
I'm sorry you are so ignorant. I did not bring the term into the
discussion. I replied to the person that did. Do try to keep up. Or is
that just too difficult for you to do?
> Nobody who can tell their own behind from a hot rock is going to take
> *anything* you say seriously after that..
Maybe you should pay attention to the thread and note I REPLIED to the
person that introduced the term. You're making yourself foolish. This is
the third time over two posts I've corrected you.
> What's amusing is that you don't seem to understand that.
What's amusing is that you can't even keep track of the thread.
>>> I didn't label them that. Someone else did. Do try to keep up.
> "The envirowhackos are nothing but useful idiots." Your very own
> words. Deal.
Now read the quoted material from that post, scroll one post up the
branch. You'll find I didn't introduce the term. Thanks for playing. Of
course I do note that this is what you focus on instead of the actual
subject matter. That is very telling. It means you can't debate the
actual points I made. Face it, today's environmental movement is
essentially to centralize and increase the power of the state, to
benefit the corporations favored by the state, not to protect the
environment.
