On 2008-09-19, Twibil gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 19, 1:15Â pm, Brent P yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>> On 2008-09-19, Twibil gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Heh. Looks as if even the bottom end of the bell curve can afford
>>> computers these days.
>>
>> I'm sorry your education was so lacking.
>
> I taught for twelve years at the University of California. (Of course
> we all know that college instructors live in ivory tower worlds with
> no connection to reality. ["We", in this case meaning every high
> school dropout in the nation.])
That's nice. Doesn't mean you have a clue. In fact it means you probably
don't. The one thing that government doesn't teach in the government's
schools is how the scam works.
>> Maybe some day you'll figure out how things really worked and have worked for centuries.
> Usenet ploy #1: claim to have special knowledge, and assume an air of
> superiority in the face of all evidence to the contrary.
My knowledge isn't special nor did I claim it was. You however decided
to be insulting towards me but now you seem upset it came back at you.
>> Especially when it's in their best interest to control supply. What
>> reason does big oil have to increase supply? Try NONE. There's no free
>> market, there is no competition on the horizon. They have no reason to
>> increase supply and reduce prices.
> So? That doesn't effect the fact that your labeling of the
> "envirowhackos" was mere far right wing propaganda.
I didn't label them that. Someone else did. Do try to keep up. What you
want to call them doesn't change the fact they are more big government
useful idiots for the single effective establishment party.