> http://enews.earthlink.net/article/nat?guid=20070118/45aefed0_3ca6_1552620070118...

> The Man In Black wrote:

>> maxo wrote:

>>> The Man In Black wrote:
>>>

>>>> Ah, poor thing, can't go back and relive the 90's illusion that no
>>>> one can hurt us eh?

>>> That statement itself is an illusion. It's also an allusion to the lie
>>> that it's "all Bill's fault", you know--that tired old meme that's way
>>> over used.
>>>
>>> Fact is, that during the 90s, our executive branch of the government
>>> did as much as they could for national security--the problem was the
>>> majority in congress which was too obsessed with partisanship and
>>> obstructionism to help out.
>>>
>>>

>>>> Can't go back and erase 9/11 eh?

>>> No we can't. But it's amazing how a vast majority of the country erased
>>> the obvious culpability in this administration's inability to protect ...

> "maxo" gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1169251640.356623.256620@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

>> The Man In Black wrote:
>>

>>> My, my, my, so sensitive, and this after your victory in the house
>>> & senate, and possible looming victory in '08 for the executive!

>> I'm not behaving in a sensitive manner, just asking for counter
>> argument. But instead all you offer is basically a school yard taunt.
>>

>
> Cut him a little slack. His wing of American politics is broken and
> non-sequiters is all he's got left. Even the "freedom fries" Congressman has
> bolted from the fold and wants no more to do with Iraq and one of Condi
> Rice's former speech writers says she has no clue at all about Middle East
> history. He's even considering that the Universe may well have cracked,
> since Faux News has climbed on the bandwagon to bolster Hillary Clinton's
> campaign rhetoric that Barak Obama, whose middle name is Hussein, grew up
> with his father and attended Muslim schools, so he might have been trained
> as a terrorist. Gee, now it looks like even Faux News is siding with the ...

>
> "maxo" gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1169251640.356623.256620@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

>>
>> The Man In Black wrote:
>>

>>> My, my, my, so sensitive, and this after your victory...

> Stupendous Man wrote:

>> http://enews.earthlink.net/article/nat?guid=20070118/45aefed0_3ca6_1552620070118...

>
> You suck little tiny cheneydicks~!
> You *SCUM*~!
> You crap have been selling the "cuteness" of death and dismemberment
> for the love of bushit's lying war, YOU CRAP~!
> "Isn't death cute~!"
> "Isn't he walking well with those prosthetics~!?"
> "Goodie, metal arms that move~!"
>
> Fuck you~!
> Here's my wish for you:
> mangled legs, ripped off arms, face screwed up, whole body burned, an
> infection to kill you after months of *agony*~!
> You scum~!
> Don't forget to die, since your motto is "no welfare"~!
> Fuck you~!
> ...

>>

> Ah, poor thing, can't go back and relive the 90's illusion that no
> one can hurt us eh?

>Can't go back and erase 9/11 eh?

> The Man In Black wrote:
>

>> Ah, poor thing, can't go back and relive the 90's illusion that no
>> one can hurt us eh?

>
> That statement itself is an illusion. It's also an allusion to the lie
> that it's "all Bill's fault", you know--that tired old meme that's way
> over used.
>
> Fact is, that during the 90s, our executive branch of the government
> did as much as they could for national security--the problem was the
> majority in congress which was too obsessed with partisanship and
> obstructionism to help out.
>
>

>> Can't go back and erase 9/11 eh?

>
> No we can't. But it's amazing how a vast majority of the country erased
> the obvious culpability in this administration's inability to protect ...

> maxo wrote:

>> The Man In Black wrote:
>>

>>> Ah, poor thing, can't go back and relive the 90's illusion that no
>>> one can hurt us eh?

>>
>> That statement itself is an illusion. It's also an allusion to the lie
>> that it's "all Bill's fault", you know--that tired old meme that's way
>> over used.
>>
>> Fact is, that during the 90s, our executive branch of the government
>> did as much as they could for national security--the problem was the
>> majority in congress which was too obsessed with partisanship and
>> obstructionism to help out.
>>
>>

>>> Can't go back and erase 9/11 eh?

>>
>> No we can't. But it's amazing how a vast majority of the country erased ...

> My, my, my, so sensitive, and this after your victory in the house
> & senate, and possible looming victory in '08 for the executive!

>No, I
> meant you need to take a rest from the stress of this (or more
> precisely, their - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Brotherhood)
> Jihad. So relax, get away from it all, unplug, unwind, with all this
> cold weather, you really should consider a vacation to Alaska; with all
> that frigid cold, a Swede should feel right at home! And while you're
> there, do a little ice fishing -