"MrWonderful"
aol.com> wrote in message
news:e24725b5-1cdb-461f-8c68-97f4896bffc1@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 6, 9:04?am, "InfoSuperHwyRoadKill"
hellsgate.com> wrote:> "InfoSuperHwyRoadKill"
hellsgate.com> wrote in
> message
>
> news:Bb%%jk.1179$vX2.988@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>>> "InfoSuperHwyRoadKill"
hellsgate.com> wrote in
>>> messagenews:DRKjk.685$XB4.285@bignews9.bellsouth.net...>
>>>>> I repeat, the man in Knoxville should not be identified as a
>>>>> conservative, unless of course. you believe that anyone who holds
>>>>> conservative views is mentally ill.
>
>>>> That is, upon further review, one of the dumber things that you've
>>>> ever
>>>> said. ? What should one who holds conservative views be indentified
>>>> as?
>>>> Do you believe that mental illness disqualifies him from membership in
>>>> your club?
>
>>> First of all, I have no club. ?Like that famous Markist, Groucho, I
>>> wouldn't join a club that would have me as a member.
>
>> Hilarious as usual. ?I laugh *AT* you every time you post it.
>
>>>> You have in the past discounted the core beliefs of other
>>>> conservofascist / neo-con terrorist such as Tim McViegh and Eric
>>>> Rudolph
>>>> and denied them membership in your club as well. ?You even denied
>>>> Byron
>>>> Looper membership in your fraternity iirc, but prior to commiting
>>>> murder, he was a hornhonking conservative darling that attended West
>>>> Point. Looper still received 1500+ votes after committing murder, and
>>>> Eric Rudolph is considered a hero by a "conservative" group of single
>>>> issue obsessed idiots, so maybe you're just not conservative enough.
>
>>> Assuming that there is a club as you hold in your fetid little
>>> imagination, McVeigh, Rudolph, and Looper wouldn't qualify for
>>> membership
>>> by reason of insanity. ?Neither would you and for the same reason.
>>> ?Where
>>> did I say that I was/am a conservative? ?I have stated in the past that
>>> I'm a fiscal conservative and a social liberal.
>
>> Well, then that must make it so, but there is the self perception that
>> one
>> has and the reality of the perception of others. ?It would be
>> interesting
>> to see how your self perception overlays the perception of others. ?By
>> the
>> way, based on your statement, Adkinson's perception is that his problems
>> stem from the ruination of this great country by the liberals at the
>> church where he terrorized the congregation by firing a shotgun
>> indiscriminately and killing the demon liberals. ?Basically he could
>> kill
>> liberal fish in a barrell. ?Your failure to comprehend this is the
>> reason
>> that your post here was so incredibly stupid.
>
>> Consenting adults can
>>> pretty much do what they want as long as they don't harm others and
>>> don't
>>> expect me and the other taxpayers to pay to clean up after them.
>
>>>> I might also point out that all 4 mentioned here received their
>>>> training
>>>> in killing from the United States Government, 2 of which were members
>>>> of
>>>> the 101st Airborne.
>
>>> Four? ?You cannot even count. ?How many men have been members of the
>>> 101st since inception? ?Apply the 10%% of the population is mentally ill
>>> standard to that number and the result will be in the thousands and 2
>>> (which one other than McVeigh?) becomes insignificant. ?Apparently
>>> you're
>>> trying to smear our military by using the insane actions of three (or
>>> is
>>> it four) individuals.
>
>> The Master Bookeeper/Kent challange:
>
>> Count the Conservomurders / Neocon terrorist previously refered to in
>> this
>> thread.
>
>> This could be tricky since Kent is a trained counter.
>
>> 1) The man in Knoxville, (see first paragraph) otherwise know as James
>> Adkinson and the reason I posted. ?The man Kent says should not be
>> considered a conservative even though (using the Kent argument of
>> declaration that *HE* is what he declares he is) he declared what his
>> intentions where and the reason behind it. ?If he's not a conservative
>> as
>> MK claims, then he is still a consevative terrorist fostered in his
>> beliefs by the last 16 years of conservative hate speak that manifested
>> itself in his mind to the point he felt it necessary to KILL LIBERALS.
>> Former member of 101st.
>
>> 2) Conservo Murder: Looper, also declared. Army, West Point.
>> 3) Neo-con Terrorist: McViegh, Army, Bronze Star.
>> 4) Neo-con Terrorist: Rudolph, still declaring, Former member, 101st
>
>> How'd I do Master Kent?
>
>> I can't help it that four of the four mentioned in this thread (100%%)
>> were
>> trained in killing by the military and two (50%%) belonged to the 101st.
>> It's a good diversion to suggest I was smearing the military. ?A well
>> known conservative gambit to divert attention from the fact that you're
>> a
>> fucking idiot.
>
>>> While they may not qualify as legally insane, anyone who takes the life
>>> of another except in self-defense or the defense of others is crazy.
>>> ?The
>>> Unabomber had Al Gore's book, The Earth In Crisis, in his shack. ?Does
>>> that make Ted Kaczynski a liberal, a member of YOUR club?
>
>> I don't know, did his manifesto *declare* that he was killing
>> conservatives for their belief?
>
>> ?How about OJ,
>
>> I don't know. ?Last time I checked he was found innocent, but was there
>> evidence indicating he killed Nicole for voting ?for liberals?
>
>>> Blake,
>
>> I don't know. ?Last time I checked he was accquited, but was there
>> evidence indicating he killed Bakely for her liberal views? ?Of course
>> with Blake, you could be spot on.
>
>> and the fruitcake music producer Phil Spector?
>
>> I don't know. ?Last time I checked he has had two trials but has yet to
>> be
>> convicted and will be tried yet again soon, but is there evidence
>> indicating he killed Lana Clarkson for her conservative or liberal views
>> and that she is ruining the United States because of that belief?
>
> . . . Still waiting on my math grade. ?Was it four?
>
> . . . Do I get extra credit for your trick questions about people who were
> either acquitted or not actually yet convicted of murder?-
"Count the neo-murderers terrorists"~!?
bushit and little dick cheney are terrorist mass murderers~! fuckem
and Saddam 'em.
And if you're waiting for kent to admit his error .... that's like the
definition of insanity "repeating the same mistakes and expecting
different results."
kent *never admits his stupidity~!
I kind of miss him. I rely on his stupid remarks.
he makes me feel better about me~!
: ) Lala
Last week was a bad week for Kent. He was way dumber than usual. All his
unprovoked attacks backfire on him. He would fair much better taking the
malak defensive posture from the Conan movie and squating in a corner with
two knives. He sucks on offense.
