> "InfoSuperHwyRoadKill" hellsgate.com> wrote in message
>
> news:Bb%%jk.1179$vX2.988@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

>> "Kent Finnell" bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>>news:rnMjk.686$De7.158@bignews7.bellsouth.net...

>>> "InfoSuperHwyRoadKill" hellsgate.com> wrote in
>>> messagenews:DRKjk.685$XB4.285@bignews9.bellsouth.net...

>

>>>>> I repeat, the man in Knoxville should not be identified as a
>>>>> conservative, unless of course. you believe that anyone who holds
>>>>> conservative views is mentally ill.

>

>>>> That is, upon further review, one of the dumber things that you've ever
>>>> said. � What should one who holds conservative views be indentified as?
>>>> Do you believe that mental illness disqualifies him from membership in
>>>> your club?

>

>>> First of all, I have no club. �Like that famous Markist, Groucho, I
>>> wouldn't join a club that would have me as a member.

>

>> Hilarious as usual. �I laugh *AT* you every time you post it.

>

>>>> You have in the past discounted the core beliefs of other
>>>> conservofascist / neo-con terrorist such as Tim McViegh and Eric Rudolph
>>>> and denied them membership in your club as well. �You even denied Byron
>>>> Looper membership in your fraternity iirc, but prior to commiting
>>>> murder, he was a hornhonking conservative darling that attended West
>>>> Point. Looper still received 1500+ votes after committing murder, and
>>>> Eric Rudolph is considered a hero by a "conservative" group of single
>>>> issue obsessed idiots, so maybe you're just not conservative enough.

>

>>> Assuming that there is a club as you hold in your fetid little
>>> imagination, McVeigh, Rudolph, and Looper wouldn't qualify for membership
>>> by reason of insanity. �Neither would you and for the same reason. �Where
>>> did I say that I was/am a conservative? �I have stated in the past that
>>> I'm a fiscal conservative and a social liberal.

>

>> Well, then that must make it so, but there is the self perception that one
>> has and the reality of the perception of others. �It would be interesting
>> to see how your self perception overlays the perception of others. �By the
>> way, based on your statement, Adkinson's perception is that his problems
>> stem from the ruination of this great country by the liberals at the
>> church where he terrorized the congregation by firing a shotgun
>> indiscriminately and killing the demon liberals. �Basically he could kill
>> liberal fish in a barrell. �Your failure to comprehend this is the reason
>> that your post here was so incredibly stupid.

>

>> Consenting adults can

>>> pretty much do what they want as long as they don't harm others and don't
>>> expect me and the other taxpayers to pay to clean up after them.

>

>>>> I might also point out that all 4 mentioned here received their training
>>>> in killing from the United States Government, 2 of which were members of
>>>> the 101st Airborne.

>

>>> Four? �You cannot even count. �How many men have been members of the
>>> 101st since inception? �Apply the 10%% of the population is mentally ill
>>> standard to that number and the result will be in the thousands and 2
>>> (which one other than McVeigh?) becomes insignificant. �Apparently you're
>>> trying to smear our military by using the insane actions of three (or is
>>> it four) individuals.

>

>> The Master Bookeeper/Kent challange:

>

>> Count the Conservomurders / Neocon terrorist previously refered to in this
>> thread.

>

>> This could be tricky since Kent is a trained counter.

>

>> 1) The man in Knoxville, (see first paragraph) otherwise know as James
>> Adkinson and the reason I posted. �The man Kent says should not be
>> considered a conservative even though (using the Kent argument of
>> declaration that *HE* is what he declares he is) he declared what his
>> intentions where and the reason behind it. �If he's not a conservative as
>> MK claims, then he is still a consevative terrorist fostered in his
>> beliefs by the last 16 years of conservative hate speak that manifested
>> itself in his mind to the point he felt it necessary to KILL LIBERALS.
>> Former member of 101st.

>

>> 2) Conservo Murder: Looper, also declared. Army, West Point.
>> 3) Neo-con Terrorist: McViegh, Army, Bronze Star.
>> 4) Neo-con Terrorist: Rudolph, still declaring, Former member, 101st

>

>> How'd I do Master Kent?

>

>> I can't help it that four of the four mentioned in this thread (100%%) were
>> trained in killing by the military and two (50%%) belonged to the 101st.
>> It's a good diversion to suggest I was smearing the military. �A well
>> known conservative gambit to divert attention from the fact that you're a
>> fucking idiot.

>

>>> While they may not qualify as legally insane, anyone who takes the life
>>> of another except in self-defense or the defense of others is crazy. �The
>>> Unabomber had Al Gore's book, The Earth In Crisis, in his shack. �Does
>>> that make Ted Kaczynski a liberal, a member of YOUR club?

>

>> I don't know, did his manifesto *declare* that he was killing
>> conservatives for their belief?

>

>> �How about OJ,

>

>> I don't know. �Last time I checked he was found innocent, but was there
>> evidence indicating he killed Nicole for voting �for liberals?

>

>>> Blake,

>

>> I don't know. �Last time I checked he was accquited, but was there
>> evidence indicating he killed Bakely for her liberal views? �Of course
>> with Blake, you could be spot on.

>

>> and the fruitcake music producer Phil Spector?

>

>> I don't know. �Last time I checked he has had two trials but has yet to be
>> convicted and will be tried yet again soon, but is there evidence
>> indicating he killed Lana Clarkson for her conservative or liberal views
>> and that she is ruining the United States because of that belief?

>
> . . . Still waiting on my math grade. �Was it four?
>
> . . . Do I get extra credit for your trick questions about people who were
> either acquitted or not actually yet convicted of murder?-