>>>
>>> I repeat, the man in Knoxville should not be identified as a
>>> conservative, unless of course. you believe that anyone who holds
>>> conservative views is mentally ill.
>>>
>>
>> That is, upon further review, one of the dumber things that you've ever
>> said. What should one who holds conservative views be indentified as?
>> Do you believe that mental illness disqualifies him from membership in
>> your club?
>
> First of all, I have no club. Like that famous Markist, Groucho, I
> wouldn't join a club that would have me as a member.
>
Hilarious as usual. I laugh *AT* you every time you post it.
>>
>> You have in the past discounted the core beliefs of other conservofascist
>> / neo-con terrorist such as Tim McViegh and Eric Rudolph and denied them
>> membership in your club as well. You even denied Byron Looper membership
>> in your fraternity iirc, but prior to commiting murder, he was a
>> hornhonking conservative darling that attended West Point. Looper still
>> received 1500+ votes after committing murder, and Eric Rudolph is
>> considered a hero by a "conservative" group of single issue obsessed
>> idiots, so maybe you're just not conservative enough.
>
> Assuming that there is a club as you hold in your fetid little
> imagination, McVeigh, Rudolph, and Looper wouldn't qualify for membership
> by reason of insanity. Neither would you and for the same reason. Where
> did I say that I was/am a conservative? I have stated in the past that
> I'm a fiscal conservative and a social liberal.
Well, then that must make it so, but there is the self perception that one
has and the reality of the perception of others. It would be interesting to
see how your self perception overlays the perception of others. By the way,
based on your statement, Adkinson's perception is that his problems stem
from the ruination of this great country by the liberals at the church where
he terrorized the congregation by firing a shotgun indiscriminately and
killing the demon liberals. Basically he could kill liberal fish in a
barrell. Your failure to comprehend this is the reason that your post here
was so incredibly stupid.
Consenting adults can
> pretty much do what they want as long as they don't harm others and don't
> expect me and the other taxpayers to pay to clean up after them.
>>
>> I might also point out that all 4 mentioned here received their training
>> in killing from the United States Government, 2 of which were members of
>> the 101st Airborne.
>
> Four? You cannot even count. How many men have been members of the 101st
> since inception? Apply the 10%% of the population is mentally ill standard
> to that number and the result will be in the thousands and 2 (which one
> other than McVeigh?) becomes insignificant. Apparently you're trying to
> smear our military by using the insane actions of three (or is it four)
> individuals.
>
The Master Bookeeper/Kent challange:
Count the Conservomurders / Neocon terrorist previously refered to in this
thread.
This could be tricky since Kent is a trained counter.
1) The man in Knoxville, (see first paragraph) otherwise know as James
Adkinson and the reason I posted. The man Kent says should not be
considered a conservative even though (using the Kent argument of
declaration that *HE* is what he declares he is) he declared what his
intentions where and the reason behind it. If he's not a conservative as MK
claims, then he is still a consevative terrorist fostered in his beliefs by
the last 16 years of conservative hate speak that manifested itself in his
mind to the point he felt it necessary to KILL LIBERALS. Former member of
101st.
2) Conservo Murder: Looper, also declared. Army, West Point.
3) Neo-con Terrorist: McViegh, Army, Bronze Star.
4) Neo-con Terrorist: Rudolph, still declaring, Former member, 101st
How'd I do Master Kent?
I can't help it that four of the four mentioned in this thread (100%%) were
trained in killing by the military and two (50%%) belonged to the 101st.
It's a good diversion to suggest I was smearing the military. A well known
conservative gambit to divert attention from the fact that you're a fucking
idiot.
> While they may not qualify as legally insane, anyone who takes the life of
> another except in self-defense or the defense of others is crazy. The
> Unabomber had Al Gore's book, The Earth In Crisis, in his shack. Does
> that make Ted Kaczynski a liberal, a member of YOUR club?
I don't know, did his manifesto *declare* that he was killing conservatives
for their belief?
How about OJ,
I don't know. Last time I checked he was found innocent, but was there
evidence indicating he killed Nicole for voting for liberals?
> Blake,
I don't know. Last time I checked he was accquited, but was there evidence
indicating he killed Bakely for her liberal views? Of course with Blake,
you could be spot on.
and the fruitcake music producer Phil Spector?
I don't know. Last time I checked he has had two trials but has yet to be
convicted and will be tried yet again soon, but is there evidence indicating
he killed Lana Clarkson for her conservative or liberal views and that she
is ruining the United States because of that belief?
