Author: Stupendous ManStupendous Man Date: Mar 10, 2007 11:09
Boston Blackie wrote:
> As usual, Georg, you completely miss the point.
>
> On a regular basis you parade your belief in the absolutely trvthfulness
> of everything you've seen on the History Channel.
>
Excuse me but James Cameron's special last time I looked was on
the Discovery Channel! And I watch some of the History Channel's
conclusions about History regarding Religion and beg to differ. Also
you have to remember Elliot, the History that is more recently recorded
in the twentieth century with volumes of text and sometimes volume of
film to back it up, tends to have a little bit more reliability, then
when they go on speculation, because the farther they go into history,
the more history becomes a science of facts based upon a lot of theory,
and then again, some very good recorded history. Since Joshua/Jesus was
a common name in Jewish culture, am I shocked to find the they found
Judas son of Jesus in a family tomb supposedly belonging to Jesus'
family? Jesus had brother and sisters, and its quite possible a least
one of them named their children after him, or a relative in the family
named Judas, and you have to remember that there were two Judas' amongst ...
|