... dictionarys reflect usage as well as logic. When enough people fail to comprehend "nett" vs "net" the next edition of the dictionary will report that misusage. Meanwhile, if you write "net" while intending "nett" you can expect readers to read "net" and wonder why you're introducing fishing or big game ...

... the way. Not quite - dictionarys reflect usage as well as logic. When enough people fail to comprehend "nett" vs "net" the next edition of the dictionary will report that misusage. Meanwhile, if you write "net" while intending "nett" you can expect readers to read "net" and wonder why you're introducing fishing or big game capture into the discussion. ...

...quite - dictionarys reflect usage as well as logic. When enough people fail to comprehend "nett" vs "net" the next edition of the dictionary will report that misusage. Meanwhile, if you write "net" while intending "nett" you can expect readers to read "net" and wonder why you're introducing fishing or big game capture ...

... out to me! I promise! Have you advised both Oxford and Chambers dictionaries that they also can't spell? Absolutely - I've also pointed out to you that dictionaries reflect common misusage. Please explain why you cannot come to grips with the fact that there are regional spelling differences. Of course I can come to terms with the fact that there are ...

... out of the way. Not quite - dictionarys reflect usage as well as logic. When enough people fail to comprehend "nett" vs "net" the next edition of the dictionary will report that misusage. Meanwhile, if you write "net" while intending "nett" you can expect readers to read "net" and wonder why you're introducing fishing or big game capture into the discussion. No, ...

... Not quite - dictionarys reflect usage as well as logic. When enough people fail to comprehend "nett" vs "net" the next edition of the dictionary will report that misusage. Meanwhile, if you write "net" while intending "nett" you can expect readers to read "net" and wonder why you're introducing fishing or big game capture into the ...

... > Not quite - dictionarys reflect usage as well as logic. When enough people fail to comprehend "nett" vs "net" the next edition of the dictionary will report that misusage. Meanwhile, if you write "net" while intending "nett" you can expect readers to read "net" and wonder why you're introducing fishing or big game capture into the discussion....

...>> Not quite - dictionarys reflect usage as well as logic. When enough people fail to comprehend "nett" vs "net" the next edition of the dictionary will report that misusage. Meanwhile, if you write "net" while intending "nett" you can expect readers to read "net" and wonder why you're introducing fishing or big game capture into the discussion. ...

...of the way. Not quite - dictionarys reflect usage as well as logic. When enough people fail to comprehend "nett" vs "net" the next edition of the dictionary will report that misusage. Meanwhile, if you write "net" while intending "nett" you can expect readers to read "net" and wonder why you're introducing fishing or big game capture into the discussion. No, no-...

...'s that out of the way. Not quite - dictionarys reflect usage as well as logic. When enough people fail to comprehend "nett" vs "net" the next edition of the dictionary will report that misusage. Meanwhile, if you write "net" while intending "nett" you can expect readers to read "net" and wonder why you're introducing fishing or big game capture into the discussion. Next ... ?