muc.lists.netbsd.port.powerpc
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
muc.lists.netbsd.port.powerpc only
 
Advanced search
August 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
    123 31
45678910 32
11121314151617 33
18192021222324 34
25262728293031 35
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
muc.lists.netbsd.port.powerpc Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  muc.lists.netbsd.port.powerpc kingdom         


Author: Charlie.Lehenbauer
Date: Aug 14, 2008 17:10

http://potato.googlebong.com

Aloysius Propp GoogleBong

img { border: 2px solid Black }

pre { font: 6pt/8pt }

p,blockquote { font: 16pt; font-family: verdana, arial, 'sans serif' }

h1,h2,h3,h4,ul { font-family: verdana, arial, 'sans serif'; font: 14p }

table,li,td { font-family: verdana, arial, 'sans serif'; font: 12p }

ul { list-style: disc }

ol { list-style: decimal }

body { background: "#EEEEEE" }

h1,h2,h3,h4,hr,p,ul,blockquote,pre { color:Black }

a:link { color:Blue }

a:visited { color:Blue }

a:active { color:"#008000" }

a:hover { color:"#008000" }

h1.header { padding:0em; margin:0 }

div.container { width:100%%; margin:0px; border:1px solid Black; line-height:150%% }

div.header,div.footer { padding:0.5em; color:white; background-color:Black; clear:left }

div.left { width:15%%; margin:0; float:left; padding:0; }
Show full article (1.08Kb)
no comments
  Package binaries for NetBSD/macppc 3.1_STABLE / pkgsrc-2008Q2         


Author: Havard Eidnes
Date: Jul 27, 2008 12:58

Hi,

I've uploaded the new files in the results of a bulk rebuild of
pkgsrc-2008Q2 (um, actually started a bit before the branch was
cut) done on NetBSD/macppc 3.1_STABLE to

ftp://ftp.NetBSD.org/pub/pkgsrc/packages/NetBSD/powerpc/3.1-2008Q2/

A total of 6.7GB of packages were uploaded, for a total of 6204
packages.

The source tree this was built from was updated Jul 8, 2008.

I'll re-update and re-build on this branch, and send a new
announcement when the build is done.

As indicated above, the build was done on a machine running NetBSD
3.1_STABLE, and most of these packages should be usable on newer
versions of the OS up to where we switched to gcc 4, and should also
be usable on 3.1 and probably on 3.0 as well. For the packages which
are not architecture-specific (should be the vast majority), these
packages should also be usable on other powerpc ports.

Regards,

- HÃ¥vard
Show full article (1.03Kb)
1 Comment
  Need testing on IBMNWS with cardbus slot         


Author: Tim Rightnour
Date: Jul 24, 2008 10:12

I'm currently borrowing an ibmnws to play around with and try and get a few
things working on. I've been playing with getting the cardbus slot working,
and *almost* have it working, but it's doing something very odd for me. When
it reads the CIS data from a pcmcia card, it seems to re-read 64 bytes twice,
then skip 64 and read twice, etc etc.

It was suggested to me that this might be a hardware malfunction in my unit.
Does anyone else have one of these with a cardbus slot? I have a test kernel
that I would like you to boot, and capture the console output via the serial
port. If you could put a random pcmcia card in the box and try to boot this
kernel, I would appreciate it greatly. (also, a cardbus card test would also
be appreciated, but I have no idea if that will work or not, as I don't own any
cardbus cards, yet)

Kernel is at:
http://www.garbled.net/tmp/netbsd.ibmnws.cbb

You should be able to directly netboot this kernel, it is prepared. It will
spew alot of debugging garbage, don't worry about that, just capture everything.
Show full article (1.33Kb)
no comments
  advocates         


Author: hassan
Date: Jul 20, 2008 20:50

Attn : Mr General manager

Dear Mr /

We are Advocates Without Frontiers law firm, whose head office is located at the Emirate of Dubai, and duly licensed to practice attorney and render legal consultancy all over the UAE.

We would kindly offer our service if you face anylegal problem in any place all over uae

For any clarification
You can contact us on
00971505065861
Advocate hassan

--
Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-admin@muc.de
no comments
  mutexes in IPIs?         


Author: Michael Lorenz
Date: Jul 19, 2008 10:23

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

I just got a MUTEX_NOT_OWNED panic coming - according to ddb - from
the IPI handler on a dual G4 Mac. Last time I checked we didn't take
mutexes in IPIs, all we use them for is to flush out AltiVec and FPU
registers IIRC.

Does that ring a bell with anyone?

have fun
Michael

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Show full article (0.95Kb)
no comments
  Re: NetBSD on Synology Disk Station ?         


Author: Joel CARNAT
Date: Jul 16, 2008 05:56

Hi,
>
> Please check and see arch/sandpont/README.NAS file. Code
> has not been tested but I have little concern about it since whole
> differences are comfortably mimimazed in
> sandpoint/pci/pci_machdep.c across the flock of 8241 based
> NAS/SOHO GW boxes.
>
> Toru Nishimura / ALKYL Technology
>

I could find the DS-106j reference in README.NAS.
The "iteide" driver appears in manpages but not "mak".
Nor can I find any if_mak.c file in src/sys/dev/pci.

As I'm no developper, can I go and get one of those box or is it too much
beta-software yet ? :) It's for private use but I'm looking at replacing
my landisk which has poor network performance.

TIA,
Jo
Show full article (0.81Kb)
no comments
  Re: NetBSD on Synology Disk Station ?         


Author: Toru Nishimura
Date: Jul 15, 2008 17:35

Joel CARNAT asked;
> Has anyone checked/installed/ran NetBSD on one of those ?

Please check and see arch/sandpont/README.NAS file. Code
has not been tested but I have little concern about it since whole
differences are comfortably mimimazed in
sandpoint/pci/pci_machdep.c across the flock of 8241 based
NAS/SOHO GW boxes.

Toru Nishimura / ALKYL Technology

--
Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-admin@muc.de
no comments
  NetBSD on Synology Disk Station ?         


Author: Joel CARNAT
Date: Jul 8, 2008 08:51

Hello,

I just read that the DS-106 (IDE disk version) and DS-107 (SATA disk
version) have official firmware that enables NFS and SSH them. That makes
them NetBSD-friendly.

The firmware name is quite explicit: synology_powerpc_106j_0518.zip.
And according to some (french, sorry) forum, the internal Linux says:
NAS> cat /proc/cpuinfo
cpu : 82xx
revision : 16.20 (pvr 8081 1014)
bogomips : 132.30
vendor : Motorola
machine : MPC8241
processor : PVID: 0x80811014, vendor: Motorola

It seems to be confirmed here http://www.kik-it.com/monitor/

Has anyone checked/installed/ran NetBSD on one of those ?

TIA,
Jo
Show full article (0.76Kb)
no comments
  evbppc build fail with ath         


Author: KIYOHARA Takashi
Date: Jul 8, 2008 08:33

Hi! all,

My evbppc(OPENBLOCKS266_OPT) fails to build with this message, because
enabled ath(4) at cardbus.

# create OPENBLOCKS266_OPT/ah_osdep.d
CC=/usr/src/cross/powerpc/bin/powerpc--netbsd-gcc /usr/src/cross/powerpc/bin/nbmkdep -f ah_osdep.d -- -mcpu=403 -msoft-float -Wa,-maltivec -ffreestanding -fno...
Show full article (3.98Kb)
2 Comments
  Re: mistake the i2c_bitbang direction         


Author: KIYOHARA Takashi
Date: Jul 8, 2008 08:10

Hi! also port-powerpc guys,

First, please see this thread at current-users@.

http://mail-index.netbsd.org/current-users/2008/07/07/msg003400.html

And, I will not understand the specification of i2c.

From: Izumi Tsutsui
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 04:25:12 +0900
>>> I think mistake to set the direction. We necessary DIR(INPUT) before READ,
>>> and DIR(OUTPUT) before SETBITS().
>>
>> No.
>>
>> DIR() should be used only for SDA, not for SCL.
>> As I noted in the log message, using DIR(INPUT) to read SCL
>> in i2c_wait_for_scl() causes unexpected stop condition
>> in SCL=H, SDA=L and DIR(OUTPUT) case.
>
> Furthermore, we have to do SETBITS() before DIR(OUTPUT) in some case
> otherwise the device might put unexpected glitch during delay between
> DIR(OUTPUT) and SETBITS().
Show full article (2.06Kb)
1 Comment
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9