Re: The point of Sicko
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
mn.politics only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

mn.politics Profile…
 Up
Re: The point of Sicko         


Author: Jerry Okamura
Date: Jul 24, 2007 15:22

Let us break down the article.

It says there are 46 million uninsured in America. Do you know who they
are? How many are uninsured for short periods of time, because they are
currently between jobs? What percentage of the euninsured, are children, or
young people (what percentage of that number, actually need health
insurance)? What percentage of the uninsured, have "chosen" to be
uninsured, even though they could be insured? What percentage of the
uninsured, don't have access to any medical services, even if they had
medical insurance? What percentage of the uninsured, do not need insurance
because they make enough money that they do not need health insurance, they
can well afford to pay for their own healthcare?
Show full article (2.72Kb)
19 Comments
Re: The point of Sicko         


Author: Henry Blaskowski
Date: Jul 25, 2007 07:46

In mn.politics Jerry Okamura hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
> It says there are 46 million uninsured in America. Do you know who they
> are? How many are uninsured for short periods of time, because they are
> currently between jobs?

And what percentage of those would NOT be uninsured for those gaps
if we restored a system in which individuals were encouraged to
seek insurance on their own instead of giving tax breaks to ensure
that employer-mandated insurance is cheaper?
> What percentage of the euninsured, are children, or
> young people (what percentage of that number, actually need health
> insurance)? What percentage of the uninsured, have "chosen" to be
> uninsured, even though they could be insured?

Exactly. If I win the lottery, do you think I'm buying medical
insurance? It makes no sense. If I'm young and healthy, would I
buy insurance? Only if there is some that makes sense for me, which
there currently isn't because the laws don't allow it, for the most
part.
Show full article (1.57Kb)
no comments
Re: The point of Sicko         


Author: Al E. Gator
Date: Jul 25, 2007 07:59

"Jerry Okamura" hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:46a6a5f0$0$4689$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> Let us break down the article.
>
break it down and try to justify denying health care to little children ?

why do you want to deny health care to your fellow Americans,

do you want children to suffer and die ?

of course you do,

you're one of those inhumane, torturing, murdering, raping, enslaving japs,

people like you should be interred, I think they did that once,

how long have you been under the delusion that you're an American ?

you're as bad as those monsters who followed Tojo and Hitler
no comments
Re: The point of Sicko         


Author: Al E. Gator
Date: Jul 25, 2007 08:02

"Henry Blaskowski" remove_this.visi.com> wrote in message
news:13aeohnhtq5ta74@corp.supernews.com...
> In mn.politics Jerry Okamura hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>
> I've got a standing bet with anyone who wants to prove that there
> are people in this country who 1) need medical care, 2) can't afford
> their own care, 3) have searched for medical care, and 4) can't get
> medical care. In a country of 300,000,000 people, would it be a
> crisis if 1/2 of 1%% of the population fell into this category?
> How about 1/10th of 1%%? Someone point me to 300,000 people who
> meet all these criteria. Names please.
>

Blaskowski ?

OK goober, jokes over,

why don't you tell us why we should listen to a dumb hillbilly pollack,

I got one for you goober,

why do flies have wings ?

to beat the Pollack to the garbage can
no comments
Re: The point of Sicko         


Author: guys
Date: Jul 25, 2007 08:53

On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:46:15 -0000, hblask@remove_this.visi.com (Henry
Blaskowski) wrote:
>In mn.politics Jerry Okamura hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> It says there are 46 million uninsured in America. Do you know who they
>> are? How many are uninsured for short periods of...
Show full article (3.45Kb)
no comments
Re: The point of Sicko         


Author: Jerry Okamura
Date: Jul 25, 2007 09:54

"Al E. Gator" yahoo.net> wrote in message
news:xyJpi.25770$bz7.17370@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net...
>
> "Jerry Okamura" hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:46a6a5f0$0$4689$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>> Let us break down the article.
>>
> break it down and try to justify denying health care to little children ?

Little children for the most part do not have life threatening diseases.
Little children, other than colds, do not have much need for free
healthcare, their parents if they can and do care for their children will
find the care they need.
>
> why do you want to deny health care to your fellow Americans,
Show full article (1.23Kb)
no comments
Re: The point of Sicko         


Author: Thumper
Date: Jul 25, 2007 10:47

On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:46:15 -0000, hblask@remove_this.visi.com (Henry
Blaskowski) wrote:
>In mn.politics Jerry Okamura hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> It says there are 46 million uninsured in America. Do you know who they
>> are? How many are uninsured for short periods of...
Show full article (1.93Kb)
no comments
Re: The point of Sicko         


Author: Alan S
Date: Jul 25, 2007 15:32

On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:54:20 -0700, "Jerry Okamura"
hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>Little children for the most part do not have life threatening diseases.
>Little children, other than colds, do not have much need for free
>healthcare, their parents if they can and do care for their children will
>find the care they need.

Pathetic. You've obviously never been a parent. Which, on
consideration, means at least you haven't reproduced
yourself which is excellent news.

Please cut the crossposts people.

Cheers, Alan
no comments
Re: The point of Sicko         


Author: Jerry Okamura
Date: Jul 25, 2007 18:10

I have two grown daughters.

"Alan S" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fnjfa3hq79248c99c66tg7rmdgk8o8smec@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:54:20 -0700, "Jerry Okamura"
> hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>Little children for the most part do not have life threatening diseases.
>>Little children, other than colds, do not have much need for free
>>healthcare, their parents if they can and do care for their children will
>>find the care they need.
>
> Pathetic. You've obviously never been a parent. Which, on
> consideration, means at least you haven't reproduced
> yourself which is excellent news.
>
> Please cut the crossposts people.
>
> Cheers, Alan
no comments
Re: The point of Sicko         


Author: Jerry Okamura
Date: Jul 25, 2007 18:10

"Måck©®" renotworthsaving.net> wrote in message
news:q9ofa3dgslfa1odcufruc6vgmuuepqo9jg@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:54:20 -0700, "Jerry Okamura"
> hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Al E. Gator" yahoo.net> wrote in message
>>news:xyJpi.25770$bz7.17370@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net...
>>
>>Little children for the most part do not have life threatening diseases.
>
> you are truly ignorant.
>

Prove it....
no comments
1 2