|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: S. SmithS. Smith Date: Jul 11, 2007 18:26
Take off the blinders
The odious Tiahrt Amendment must not be allowed to remain as part of the Justice
Department spending bill. It keeps police officers from doing their job.
From the Journal Sentinel
Posted: July 11, 2007
http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=631960&format=print
The House Appropriations Committee has a chance today to show that it can think
straight despite the mind-addling effects of the cash and power of the gun lobby. We
urge the committee, led by Rep. Dave Obey (D-Wis.) to do just that by rejecting the
noxious Tiahrt Amendment.
The amendment - named for Rep. Todd Tiahrt (R-Kan.), who originally sponsored it -
prohibits the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives from
releasing analyses of data it has mined by tracing the history of guns used in
crimes. The amendment has been attached to the Justice Department's budget every year
since 2003.
|
| Show full article (2.79Kb) |
|
| | 12 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Jeff DegeJeff Dege Date: Jul 11, 2007 19:11
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:26:08 -0500, S.Smith wrote:
>
> Without such gun-trace information, it becomes much harder to track
> illegal firearms carried between states, which contributes to gun violence
> in cities like Milwaukee.
If the police in Milwaukee have a gun that was used in a crime, they can
ask BATF for a trace and BATF will provide it.
--
b0VIM 6.3
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: S. SmithS. Smith Date: Jul 11, 2007 19:23
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:11:45 -0500, Jeff Dege jdege.visi.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:26:08 -0500, S.Smith wrote:
>>
>> Without such gun-trace information, it becomes much harder to track
>> illegal firearms carried between states, which contributes to gun violence
>> in cities like Milwaukee.
>
>If the police in Milwaukee have a gun that was used in a crime, they can
>ask BATF for a trace and BATF will provide it.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Jeff DegeJeff Dege Date: Jul 11, 2007 20:04
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:23:10 -0500, S.Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:11:45 -0500, Jeff Dege jdege.visi.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:26:08 -0500, S.Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> Without such gun-trace information, it becomes much harder to track
>>> illegal firearms carried between states, which contributes to gun
>>> violence in cities like Milwaukee.
>>
>>If the police in Milwaukee have a gun that was used in a crime, they can
>>ask BATF for a trace and BATF will provide it.
>
> Why should they have to ask the BATF for anything?
Because BATF has the data, and BATF runs the traces.
--
By no means all socialists were killers or amoral. Many were sincere
humanitarians; mostly these were the adherents of democratic socialism.
But democratic socialism turned out to be a contradiction...
|
| Show full article (1.49Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: S. SmithS. Smith Date: Jul 11, 2007 20:13
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:04:12 -0500, Jeff Dege jdege.visi.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:23:10 -0500, S.Smith wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:11:45 -0500, Jeff Dege jdege.visi.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:26:08 -0500, S.Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Without such gun-trace information, it becomes much harder to track
>>>> illegal firearms carried between states, which contributes to gun
>>>> violence in cities like Milwaukee.
>>>
>>>If the police in Milwaukee have a gun that was used in a crime, they can
>>>ask BATF for a trace and BATF will provide it.
>>
>> Why should they have to ask the BATF for anything?
>
>Because BATF has the data, and BATF runs the traces.
Why block the local police forces from getting that information?
|
| Show full article (1.06Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: D. A. TsenufD. A. Tsenuf Date: Jul 12, 2007 05:32
"Jeff Dege" jdege.visi.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2007.07.12.03.04.11.72534@jdege.visi.com...
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:23:10 -0500, S.Smith wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:11:45 -0500, Jeff Dege jdege.visi.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:26:08 -0500, S.Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Without such gun-trace information, it becomes much harder to track
>>>> illegal firearms carried between states, which contributes to gun
>>>> violence in cities like Milwaukee.
>>>
>>>If the police in Milwaukee have a gun that was used in a crime, they can
>>>ask BATF for a trace and BATF will provide it.
>>
>> Why should they have to ask the BATF for anything?
>
> Because BATF has the data, and BATF runs the traces.
> ...
|
| Show full article (0.97Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Jeff DegeJeff Dege Date: Jul 12, 2007 06:21
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:13:43 -0500, S.Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:04:12 -0500, Jeff Dege jdege.visi.com>
> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Why should they have to ask the BATF for anything?
>>
>>Because BATF has the data, and BATF runs the traces.
>
> Why block the local police forces from getting that information?
The BATF isn't blocking local police forces from asking dealers who they
sold a gun to. And some states maintain records of their own, requiring
every dealer to inform the state of every gun sale. The Tiarht amendment
affects those systems not at all.
But all the manufacturers and importers in the US report to the BATF which
dealer they sold a gun to, so if a state or local law enforcement agency
has a gun which they want to trace, the place to start is with the BATF's
database. The BATF will check the database to identify the dealer, and
then contact the dealer to determine the purchaser.
|
| Show full article (1.91Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: S. SmithS. Smith Date: Jul 12, 2007 06:30
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:21:51 -0500, Jeff Dege jdege.visi.com>
wrote:
>On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:13:43 -0500, S.Smith wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:04:12 -0500, Jeff Dege jdege.visi.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> Why should they have to ask the BATF for anything?
>>>
>>>Because BATF has the data, and BATF runs the traces.
>>
>> Why block the local police forces from getting that information?
>
>The BATF isn't blocking local police forces from asking dealers who they
>sold a gun to. And some states maintain records of their own, requiring
>every dealer to inform the state of every gun sale. The Tiarht amendment
>affects those systems not at all.
I guess you haven't read much about what this amendment does.
|
| Show full article (1.32Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: ZamdristZamdrist Date: Jul 12, 2007 13:39
So we are all for tracing gun data state-to-state, but when it comes
to the administration's international-domestic wire-tapping program to
track terrorist chatter coming into the US we throw a fit.
Liberal Pussies.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Jeff DegeJeff Dege Date: Jul 12, 2007 16:56
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:30:18 -0500, S.Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:21:51 -0500, Jeff Dege jdege.visi.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>The BATF isn't blocking local police forces from asking dealers who they
>>sold a gun to. And some states maintain records of their own, requiring
>>every dealer to inform the state of every gun sale. The Tiarht amendment
>>affects those systems not at all.
>
> I guess you haven't read much about what this amendment does.
>
> "The amendment - named for Rep. Todd Tiahrt (R-Kan.), who originally
> sponsored it - prohibits the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
> Firearms and Explosives from releasing analyses of data it has mined by
> tracing the history of guns used in crimes."
Exactly. BATF can release information concerning specific guns involved
in police investigations, but cannot release aggregate data.
|
| Show full article (1.79Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|