> air hammer wrote:

>> Bill Shatzer wrote:

>

>>> Where's she's not cooperating is the investigation of the Alaskan
>>> Troopergate affair.

>>
>> Irrelevant, the guy was scumbag who got what he deserved, period.

>
> Bill's assertion that she's stonewalling is significant because it's
> election season and people will vote on what they -perceive- to be truth.

> I think it was CNN that interviewed the cop. He would only do one
> interview, to "tell his side of the story" and he really did a piss-poor
> job of it.

> If I were one of her handlers, I'd say she recommended him for the job
> because he seemed qualified, and he was hired because the hiring
> managers seemed to agree. It turned out it wasn't a great decision.
>
> The fact that he was an inlaw brings up possible nepotism talk, and to
> this I'd point out that small town Alaska ain't exactly New York City;
> with a population in the thousands there's a small pool of eligible
> applicants and radically higher likelihood that everybody knows everybody.
>
> She should offer full cooperation. 'Course, the more people are fixated
> on that, the less time they'll have before the election to focus on more
> substantial matters. It would be a great diversion tactic if on November
> 2 the media had to admit there was absolutely nothing to the story.
>
> -c