Spread Eagle В® wrote:
> On Sep 19, 9:10 am, gatt wrote:
>>If she was using it for public business, that's clearly a problem. Yahoo
>>accounts are startlingly easy to hack.
> At some point she will be asked why she had a yahoo account and if she
> used it for state business, and that's when we'll find out the answers
> to those questions.
Not any time soon apparently - if ever.
Her question ans answer sessions with the media are limited and
restricted while she is now refusing to answer any questions in the
Alaskan investigation she once "welcomed" and promised "full
cooperation" as she claimed to have "nothing to hide".
> She's shown herself to be quite open and
> transparent in her dealings. In fact, that's her calling card.
Heh! She seems to be something less than open and transparent.
"Palin initially promised to cooperate in the investigation, telling the
Legislature to "hold me accountable." Lawmakers were investigating
accusations she dismissed the state's public safety commissioner because
he refused to fire her ex-brother-in-law, a state trooper. She now
opposes the investigation."
> Most people I know in serious management or professional positions in
> both the private sector and in government have enough smarts to know
> to NEVER use email to send any kind of sensitive information under any
> circumstances. Ever. It's certainly the advice I've always given to
> my clients, going back to the mid 1980s when email was becoming de
> rigueur. Of all the modes of communication it is by far the one the
> most likely to end up biting you in the arse. I'm betting Sarah Palin
> knows that too. It's not exactly a new or unknown concept.
Nonsense - email can be made quite secure. There are several programs
for so doing, many of which can be downloaded for free.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
'Course, none will do much good if you leave decrypted copies of your
email on the yahoo server.
Peace and justice,
