On Sep 19, 11:49В am, Bill Shatzer
comcast.net> wrote:> Don Homuth wrote:
>> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:06:37 +0000 (UTC), gatt
>> wrote:
>
>>>lein wrote:
>>>>>>Read Sarah Palin's Private Emails!
>>>>>Nah -- such things are entirely uninteresting.
>>>>>What's important in this matter is the ones that were supposedly
>>>>>"private" that really should have been Public.
>>>>>That's a no-no!
>>>>Which ones are they?
>>>Once the integrity of the e-mail account has been compromised, the
>>>authenticity of any alleged data in the account is also suspect.
>>>A person who maliciously hacks or phishes an e-mail account could use
>>>existing header and address information and modify or fabricate content
>>>and then post "screen shots" of the material on the internet.
>> Hence the need for a thorough investigation of the matter -- one in
>> which all of the concerned parties ought to be openly cooperating.
>
> Oh, I'm rather confident that she's cooperating on the investigatin of
> the hacking of her yahoo account.
>
> Where's she's not cooperating is the investigation of the Alaskan
> Troopergate affair.
>
> You know, the one she initially "welcomed,", declared she had "nothing
> to hide," and promised "full cooperation".
>
> Apparently she's changed her mind on tha 'un.
>
> Wonder why?
Could it be that the tenor of the investigation turned from fair to
partisan?
>
> Can you spell S-T-O-N-E-W-A-L-L?
Can you spell W-I-T-C-H H-U-N-T?
So why do you think Ken Starr was S-T-O-N-E-W-A-L-L-E-D when
investigating Clinton?
