Don Homuth wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:06:37 +0000 (UTC), gatt
> wrote:
>
>
>>lein wrote:
>>>>>Read Sarah Palin's Private Emails!
>>>>Nah -- such things are entirely uninteresting.
>>>>What's important in this matter is the ones that were supposedly
>>>>"private" that really should have been Public.
>>>>That's a no-no!
>>>Which ones are they?
>>Once the integrity of the e-mail account has been compromised, the
>>authenticity of any alleged data in the account is also suspect.
>>A person who maliciously hacks or phishes an e-mail account could use
>>existing header and address information and modify or fabricate content
>>and then post "screen shots" of the material on the internet.
> Hence the need for a thorough investigation of the matter -- one in
> which all of the concerned parties ought to be openly cooperating.
Oh, I'm rather confident that she's cooperating on the investigatin of
the hacking of her yahoo account.
Where's she's not cooperating is the investigation of the Alaskan
Troopergate affair.
You know, the one she initially "welcomed,", declared she had "nothing
to hide," and promised "full cooperation".
Apparently she's changed her mind on tha 'un.
Wonder why?
Can you spell S-T-O-N-E-W-A-L-L?
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jOTk11gvqDAgD0cY3i4WjI_2YOxwD939EL103
Peace and justice,
