> Smells like a cover up to me.
>
> Peace and justice,
>

> Bill Shatzer wrote:

> It's amazing what subpoenas can accomplish. Hammer one and see what
> happens. It is not my opinion that information that is gained by
> intrusion or theft should be protected from severe legal retribution if
> it's published on the internet. I wouldn't be surprised if some of those
> websites go down in flames over it.

>> Perhaps, but the sourcecode has value far beyond nominal damages.

> So does official Alaska state business.

>> And, of course, the copyright for intellectual property created in the
>> course of employment belongs to the employer, not the employee.

> If I hacked your e-mail account and published your private e-mails on
> the internet, what would you do? Is nothing safe?

> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:29:58 -0700, Bill Shatzer
> comcast.net> wrote:
>

>> lein wrote:
>>

>>> On Sep 19, 11:49 am, Bill Shatzer comcast.net> wrote:
>>>

>>>> Don Homuth wrote:
>>>>

>>>>> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:06:37 +0000 (UTC), gatt
>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>> lein wrote:

>>>>>>>>> Read Sarah Palin's Private Emails!

>>>>>>>> Nah -- such things are entirely uninteresting.
>>>>>>>> What's important in this matter is the ones that were supposedly
>>>>>>>> "private" that really should have been Public.
>>>>>>>> That's a no-no!

>>>>>>> Which ones are they?

> ...

> Either my junk mail filter is working better than I dreamed or folks
> have largely given up on that practice.
>
> Bill Shatzer wrote:
>
> "And over 4,000 Americans have paid with their lives for that little
> adventure. Plus a half a trillion dollars in national treasure
>
> You might compare that with the number of lives lost on 9-11. Or the
> economic injury incurred from that event.
>
> It would have been cheaper in both lives and money to just suffer
> another 9-11 every six or seven years.