|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Zaroc StoneZaroc Stone Date: Sep 19, 2008 07:29
Read Sarah Palin's Private Emails!
Posted by Isaac Fitzgerald, AlterNet at 11:01 AM on September 17,
2008.
The folks at Gawker have got a story for you.
Kudos to the folks at GAWKER, who have gotten their hands on some of
Sarah Palin's personal emails. Check out some excerpts from their
article, including a few photos and screenshots from Palin's email
account, below. I strongly recommend that you read the whole
gawker.com article HERE:
|
| Show full article (1.23Kb) |
|
| | 44 Comments |
|
|
Date: Sep 19, 2008 07:33
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:29:50 GMT, zstone@ nospamusa.com (Zaroc Stone)
wrote:
>Read Sarah Palin's Private Emails!
Nah
-- such things are entirely uninteresting.
What's important in this matter is the ones that were supposedly
"private" that really should have been Public.
That's a no-no!
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: leinlein Date: Sep 19, 2008 07:55
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:29:50 GMT, zst...@ nospamusa.com (Zaroc Stone)
> wrote:
> >>Read Sarah Palin's Private Emails!
>
> Nah -- such things are entirely uninteresting.
>
> What's important in this matter is the ones that were supposedly
> "private" that really should have been Public.
>
> That's a no-no!
Which ones are they?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: gattgatt Date: Sep 19, 2008 08:06
lein wrote:
>>>Read Sarah Palin's Private Emails!
>>
>>Nah -- such things are entirely uninteresting.
>>
>>What's important in this matter is the ones that were supposedly
>>"private" that really should have been Public.
>>
>>That's a no-no!
>
> Which ones are they?
Once the integrity of the e-mail account has been compromised, the
authenticity of any alleged data in the account is also suspect.
A person who maliciously hacks or phishes an e-mail account could use
existing header and address information and modify or fabricate content
and then post "screen shots" of the material on the internet.
-c
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Spread Eagle®Spread Eagle® Date: Sep 19, 2008 08:34
>>Read Sarah Palin's Private Emails!
>
> Nah -- such things are entirely uninteresting.
>
> What's important in this matter is the ones that were supposedly
> "private" that really should have been Public.
>
> That's a no-no!
Nah. She had a yahoo account to share pics with family and friends,
decidedly NOT public business.
You ought to stick to your strong suit, running gadfly campaigns for
dogcatcher and such. You are clearly out of your league.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Spread Eagle®Spread Eagle® Date: Sep 19, 2008 08:35
> Hence the need for a thorough investigation of the matter -- one in
> which all of the concerned parties ought to be openly cooperating.
There will be, and the usual suspects, the messiah's minions, will be
rounded up and made to do the perp march.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Sep 19, 2008 08:41
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:35:58 -0700 (PDT), Spread Eagle®
virtualhosts.net> wrote:
>> Hence the need for a thorough investigation of the matter -- one in
>> which all of the concerned parties ought to be openly cooperating.
>
>There will be, and the usual suspects, the messiah's minions, will be
>rounded up and made to do the perp march.
Heh! Another Wingnut decides that he's detective, prosecutor, judge
and jury
-- well Before the evidence is in, and all by his lonesome.
Never seems to fail.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Sep 19, 2008 08:42
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:34:59 -0700 (PDT), Spread Eagle®
virtualhosts.net> wrote:
>>>Read Sarah Palin's Private Emails!
>>
>> Nah -- such things are entirely uninteresting.
>>
>> What's important in this matter is the ones that were supposedly
>> "private" that really should have been Public.
>>
>> That's a no-no!
>
>Nah. She had a yahoo account to share pics with family and friends,
>decidedly NOT public business.
Seems not Quite to be so clear-cut as you are trying to make it, SE.
>You ought to stick to your strong suit, running gadfly campaigns for
>dogcatcher and such. You are clearly out of your league.
|
| Show full article (0.78Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: gattgatt Date: Sep 19, 2008 09:10
Spread Eagle® wrote:
>>What's important in this matter is the ones that were supposedly
>>"private" that really should have been Public.
>>
>>That's a no-no!
>
> Nah. She had a yahoo account to share pics with family and friends,
> decidedly NOT public business.
If she was using it for public business, that's clearly a problem. Yahoo
accounts are startlingly easy to hack.
Nevertheless, the -data- from the sites that is appearing around the
internet is not credible.
By the way, if I was the McCain/Palin campaign I'd get some lawyers to
start working on the possibility of major litigation against the
websites that display the material because it's stolen intellectual
property.
They wouldn't dare post screenshots of, say, stolen Microsoft
sourcecode, even though it exists. MS would annihilate those companies.
|
| Show full article (0.91Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
