In article <4o7kb45judu0vrktmho3csrjp07echgefq@4ax.com>,
CarlSwanson fnospam.frontiernet.net> wrote:

Carl, the only problem that I can see with Nader is that he doesn't
represent a third party, unless you count the Peace and Freedom Party in
California. The Green Party is on the ballot in 21 states. I will be
voting "Green".

We need a Third Party or proportional representation to give the
U.S. real democratic representation. The Dems and the Reps, act
like they are in the pocket of the international corporations
and I presume they are. It wasn't a Republican president that
over saw banking reform and NAFTA.

You would think from their actions that our leaders are clueless,
but passing a draconian bankruptcy bill two years before a
nation wide financial melt-down, shows clearly how well
orchestrated our economy really is.

I'm not saying that there is no difference between Obama and
McCain. They clearly represent different management styles. But, in the
end, ownership remains the same (the oligarchy). If it would make a
difference who wins, I would vote for Obama, even with my misgivings.
If the state winner was already a foregone conclusion, I would vote
third party, any third party. The party will remain after the
candidate is gone.