>
>"Billy" getthe.net> wrote in message
>news:wildbilly-42BACA.22231425032008@c-61-68-245-199.per.connect.net.au...

>> In article comcast.com>,
>> "Felix D." <#1Chekist@OGPU.org> wrote:
>>

>>> "ClassWarz"
>>> wrote in message news:l5HFj.137$aV1.81@newsfe07.lga...

>>>> Arrogant, jackass, cocksucking Republican CPSC assholes conspire with
>>>> China to poison American kids again!

>>>
>>>
>>> To bad the American left will never - NEVER - criticize anything the Red
>>> Chinese do. Even San Francisco - famous for tolerance and diversity - is
>>> setting up "free speech zones" far far way from any place the Red Chinese
>>> Olympic Torch may pass while in that city.
>>>
>>> Gutless pukes on the left, greedy fucks on the right - and the guy in the
>>> middle loses even more.

>>
>> Corporations pay for both campaigns, conservative or liberal. Both are
>> indebted to the corporations. Get it? Conservative management, liberal
>> management, it's a matter of style. The owners stay the same.

>
>Laugh laugh laugh! What in the hell would *you* know about management,
>sonny?
>
>Here's the terrible truth about guys like you: when we get together in our
>boardrooms to develop a marketing plan, or a political campaign, or
>whatever, we always - always - include a "plus or minus 3%% to account for
>error" in all our sampling. And why do we do that? Simple: that's how we
>filter out the nutbars, you know, guys like you and your campus buddies,
>your pals in ANSWER or ELF or the Boys with Swastika Tattoos.
>
>You don't make even a ripple in any of our calculations because you've
>already been considered and discarded as incapable of making any real
>response. Why listen to people who can't or won't do a damned thing that
>affects the larger reality?
>
>Isn't it great?
>
>We think so.

>