Re: Is Bushco still on track to have Pentagon buy Euro planes?
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
mn.politics only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Is Bushco still on track to have Pentagon buy Euro planes?         

Group: mn.politics · Group Profile
Author: Billy
Date: May 7, 2008 14:04

In article <8cn3249k39hqpcvbv4hhqik4ou4ks1g89f@4ax.com>,
CarlSwanson nospam.frontiernet.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:52:46 -0500, Ian MacLure svpal.org> wrote:
>
>>CarlSwanson nospam.frontiernet.net> wrote in
>>news:4vh4145pm6b7lj2rn55cdj5bapi5lqkuvh@4ax.com:
>>
>>> ...I did some googling. No certainty hits.
>>>
>>> So.. is the Pentagon going to go ahead and buy those planes from the
>>> Northrup/Airbus consortium? Who's the lead man for Northrup connected
>>
>> Yup. The Northrop consortium had the best bid.
>> The GAO will say so in June and Boeing will have to lump
>> it. Mind you some of their bought and paid for politicians
>> may try to derail the whole program but thats life. Should that
>> happen Boeing may expect big time pushback from their customer.
>>
>>> to the military-industrial complex that does not hesitate to screw USA
>>> labor? Why do you vote Republican and promote the rape and pillage of
>>
>> Uncle Sugar, the CEO.
>>
>>> the USA treasury and job market, under the guise of god, gays, and
>>> guns? Pfui. Republicans have no social redeeming value.
>>>
>>> http://michellemalkin.com/2008/02/29/the-pentagon-picks-airbus-over-boein
>>> g-northwest-congressional-delegation-in-an-uproar/
>>
>> Boeing has their pocket polticians just like Microsloth.
>>
>> IBM
> you apparently see the process as clean.
>
> New testimony says the specs were changed in the middle because it
> caused only Boeing to bid. Ok...does that mean the original spec was
> designed to be exclusive? Can't tell.
>
> But the worst of the issues I heard was that the Airbus plane is
> actually too big to bedded down in many locations both domestic and
> foreign.
>
> I posted here before that the AirForce may be the most corrupt of the
> military branches and this fiasco goes along with that premise. But
> the Army, Navy are too so steeped in bid rigging and falsified
> inspections and bribes maybe I should not single out the Air Force.
>
> Then again, I hope Michael Hayden is not crazy. "Blinkie" looks like
> he stepped out of a Pink Panther casting call. And his inferred
> accommodation of torture ..if true...means he too is not it to serve.
> I wonder who his benefactor and mentor is? He got into the NSA during
> Bill Clinton's term and jsut keeps going.

Just sharing the spoils of war? Have to keep the "coalition of the
coerced" together.

I thought the sentence, "Northrop had a plane with more
capability for cargo and fuel capacity and those capabilities
made it very compelling.", might signal more wars, and more logistical
support for them.
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!