Re: Federal deficit falls to smallest level in 4 years
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
mn.politics only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Federal deficit falls to smallest level in 4 years         

Group: mn.politics · Group Profile
Author: Carl
Date: Oct 11, 2006 20:44

On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:28:30 -0500, Jeff Dege jdege.visi.com>
wrote:
> "The budget numbers are proof that pro-growth economic policies work."
>
>
>

so what? Giving tax breaks to the wealthy helps the economy too
little.. you are silent about .the shift of wealth away from the
middle class and the DEFERRED TAXES pending future generations...

pure obfuscation propaganda pusherl....when you have sky high deficits
it is EASY to get a roll back..
*****************
http://www.amazon.com/Running-Empty-Democratic-Republican-Bankrupting/dp/0312424620/sr...
Running on Empty: How the Democratic and Republican Parties Are
Bankrupting Our Future and What Americans Can Do About It (Paperback)
by Peter G. Peterson
****************
you omit the $24T off the books and $9 T official debt

.....a birth tax on future generations of $75,000...that's per baby..
traitor Dege
>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15220076/
>
>
>Federal deficit falls to smallest level in 4 years
>
>Decline seen helped by higher tax revenues
>
>Updated: 10:47 a.m. CT Oct 11, 2006
>
>
>WASHINGTON - The federal budget deficit, helped by a gusher of tax
>revenues, fell to $247.7 billion in 2006, the smallest amount of red ink
>in four years.
>
>The deficit for the budget year that ended Sept. 30 was 22.3 percent lower
>than the $318.7 billion imbalance for 2005, handing President Bush an
>economic bragging point as Republicans go into the final four weeks of a
>battle for control of Congress.
>
>Bush called the 2006 outcome a "dramatic reduction" in the deficit which
>allowed him to fulfill his 2004 campaign pledge of cutting the deficit in
>half earlier than his original 2009 target date.
>
>"These numbers show that we have now achieved our goal of cutting the
>federal deficit in half and we've done it three years ahead of schedule,"
>Bush told reporters at a Rose Garden news conference. "The budget numbers
>are proof that pro-growth economic policies work."
>
>The pledge to cut the deficit in half was based on the administration's
>forecast that the 2004 deficit would hit $521 billion, a figure that
>proved to be too pessimistic by more than $100 billion. However, the
>administration has continued to use the forecast number as its benchmark
>for deficit reduction.
>
>Bush said he would continue to urge Congress to make permanent his
>first-term tax cuts, all of which are due to expire by the end of 2010.
>
>Republicans are hoping to appeal to voters in the upcoming election as the
>party that champions tax cuts while casting Democrats, who contend that
>those tax cuts primarily benefited the wealthy, as the party which would
>increase taxes.
>
>Both spending and tax revenues climbed to all-time highs in 2006. The
>sharp narrowing of the deficit reflected the fact that revenues climbed by
>11.7 percent, outpacing the 7.3 percent increase in spending.
>
>The 2006 deficit was far lower than the $423 billion figure the
>administration had projected last February and also represented an
>improvement from a July revised estimate of $295.8 billion.
>
>Republicans said the big improvement showed that Bush's economic policies
>were working to stimulate growth and boost tax revenues. But Democrats
>said the narrowing of the deficit would be temporary as the pending
>retirement of 78 million baby boomers will send costs of the government's
>big benefit programs soaring.
>
>"The fact that some are trumpeting this year's deficit number as good news
>shows just how far we've fallen. Our budget picture is extremely serious
>by any measure," said Sen. Kent Conrad, the senior Democrat on the Budget
>Committee.
>
>The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projects that the deficit for
>the current budget year will rise to $286 billion. Over the next decade,
>the CBO forecasts that the deficit will total $1.76 trillion.
>
>Extending the Bush tax cuts, which are currently scheduled to expire at
>the end of 2010, would add another $2.2 trillion to the deficit through
>2016, the CBO estimates.
>
>The 2006 deficit was the smallest deficit since a $159 billion imbalance
>in 2002, a shortfall that came after four straight years of budget
>surpluses, the longest stretch that the government had finished with
>surpluses in seven decades.
>
>Since that time, the government has recorded three of the biggest deficits
>in history including including an all-time record in dollar terms of $413
>billion in 2004.
>
>The reason for the improvement this year was a second consecutive big jump
>in revenues, propelled by strong economic strongth. The 11.7 percent
>increase in revenues was the second biggest percentage gain in history.
>
>The administration credits its tax cuts for the improving economy,
>contending they helped the nation withstand the 2001 recession, the
>terrorist attacks and a wave corporate accounting scandals.
>
>Democratic critics, however, contend that this year's improvement in the
>deficit will be only temporary. They contend the deficit is set to explode
>over the next decade as the baby boomers begin to retire and demands on
>Social Security and Medicare increase.
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Re: Game Federer Game Federer ...rec.sport.tennis ·