>>>> 1. "Islamofascism" is America's biggest national security threat.
>>>>
>>>> Not hardly. This is the hot new idea among far-right demagogues who
>>>> literally can't define who they are without a devil to contrast
>>>> themselves against, and military hawks looking for an excuse to keep
>>> They can't even define "islamofascism".
>>>
>> A lie.
>>
No such posts were made, stop lying.
http://www.nysun.com/foreign/meaning-of-islamofascism/33302/
In a liberal Arabic Web site,
elaph.com, on December 13, an Iraqi
reformist, Dr. Abd Al-Khaleq Hussein, explained that the Iranian and
Syrian regimes are fascist in the true sense of the word, and that no
stability, democracy, or economic prosperity is possible in the region
as long as they exist.
Dr. Hussein said, "Some believe that describing the Iranian Islamic
regime and the Baath Party's Syrian regime as fascist is offensive ... I
call a spade a spade, in accordance with the scientific definition of
the terms 'Fascism' and 'Nazism.' Italian Fascism, like German Nazism,
was a racist movement that discriminated among human beings on the basis
of their racial or national affiliation ... The common denominator
defining an ideology or policy as Fascist or Nazi is discrimination
among human beings ... Since both the Iranian and Syrian regimes
discriminate among the various groups within their peoples on the basis
of religion and ethnicity, they are no different from any other fascist
or Nazi regime."
Dr. Hussein is hopeful that the West will treat "Islamofascism" in the
Middle East as Nazism in Europe was treated following World War 2 and
that it will lead to similar results: "We are optimistic about the
future ... The first domino has already fallen, when the fascist Baath
Party fell in Iraq.The rest of the dominoes will follow. Just as Nazism
and Fascism fell in Europe, and the rest of the totalitarian, tyrannical
regimes followed, it is inevitable that history will grind down the
remaining fascist regimes [in the Middle East]."
