558. D.A.'s discipline case and hiding evidence (7/9/08)

On 5/11, I returned the hundred notes to my relatives when they
visited me. They later changed them into small notes for me. I posted
"547. Plant "drug money" (5/17)" on 5/17. Two days later, there was a
news in "San Jose Mercury" that caught my eye. Topic "Field/
Prosecutor faces rare hearing". It was a rare story to discipline a
D.A..

Field is a D.A. of Santa Clara County. He is accused of disobeying
court orders, hiding the location of an exculpatory witness and
abusing his authority in three other cases. Field was alleged that "he
intentionally withheld Smith's whereabouts from the rape defendant's
lawyer because he feared it would hurt his own case. When Smith was
eventually located, he provided information that helped lead to
dismissal of the rape charge." (San Jose Mercury, 5/24/08)

In another word, he hid evidence to frame a case. Then I think of the
"drug money". I allege Feds has planted the "drug money" on me through
the hands of my relatives. They knew it is a framed case, the "drug
money" was not from the "drug trading". But they hide the truth at the
purpose to eliminate a witness whom will endanger their criminal
kingdom. They don't care to disciple a D.A. as a scapegoat in the
wrong doing so long as to eliminate a target of their most wanted.

Was Field the one who gave Feds the legal advice to the framed case on
me? If the case broke off, they can add another offence under the
Field's name, that is convenient. What Field may get is disciplined
from practicing of attorney. Or his case is just used as a cover up
story to influence the public's mind that such kind of wrong doing is
popular practice? What I realized is that Feds now let local D.A.
office and D.E.A. do the "drug money" planting case.

On 6/12, there was another news about Field. "Prosecutor's legal woes
worsen in new finding". It says "Field acted in a "deceptive and
reprehensible manner" by revealing information to the jury in
violation of the trial judge's order in that case." (San Jose Mercury,
by Leslie Griffy, 6/12/08) New finding will drag on the disciplinary
case. What I realized is that Feds will still use "drug money" to
frame the case. That means they don't limit "drug money" on hundred
note. They extend it to small notes.

Really, two days later, on 6/15, (it was father's day), my relatives
came again and took me for another big shopping spree. Anyhow, I don't
want to add another offence on Field's discipline case.
I don't touch the money my relatives gave me, even they are small
notes. I believe they were from Feds. And in super markets, I found I
was heavily surrounded by agents, they disguised as clients and store
employees. They made that shopping day a big action day.

Not only the Field's discipline case and heavy surveillance alarmed
me, also there is another news reminding me Feds is continuing to
frame a case on "drug money".

559. Plan to murder in the name of "Bank robbery" (7/19/08)

On 5/11, Feds arranged a big shopping spree day for me at the purpose
that I would spend the "drug money". I didn't. On the contrary, I
returned the 100 dollar bill to my relatives, they later change the
big bill into small notes for me.

On 5/17, I wrote, "547. Plant "drug money" (5/17) ".

On 5/20, the Mercury News reported a D.A.'s discipline case. It was
about a D.A. who deliberately hid the evidence to frame a case. I
think it was used to justify the framed case on me. I am under 24/7
surveillance. Feds must have reported that I have no job and no
income. It is truth. But they must have hid the fact I was aided by my
relatives. As a matter of fact, the money must be from the Feds and
given to me through the hands of my relatives. Eager to eliminate a
witness of their crime, Feds will do anything in their desperation.

Then on 5/23, a man was shot in the head after banking. He died 10
days later. The shooting robbery, I think, was organized by Feds at
the purpose to justify a coming murder in the name of bank robbery.
When I refuse to use the money from the Feds but go to withdraw the
cash from my bank account, they will shoot me in a planned "bank
robbery".

The news repeated 10 days later. "The man shot in the head in May
robbery dies". And on next day: "A bank is offering a $10,000 reward
for information on the death of a customer who was shot and killed
outside a San Jose branch office." (Mercury News, 6/6/08) I allege the
murder was done by Feds. Killing is unnecessary in bank robbery, let
alone to shoot in the head. It was a deliberate "shoot to kill". Feds
need a death to cover up another coming "shoot to kill" death.

To create similar incidents to cover up the main plot is a tactic Feds
often used. So the main plot would not be so prominent. It is a kind
of pre-distraction. Here are two cases I've talked about.
1. In the first secret deal of 2001, the action date was 6/11/01,
(marked by the execution of McVeigh.) Feds also planned to murder my
nephew - a student of Stanford University.(In the name of racial
shooting death.) The pre-distraction operation was to create a random
shooting death of another Asian student. She was shot in the head
outside Stanford University on 6/10/01. See detail at "63. A well
planed frame case".
2. In the January plot of 2007, in which my daughter was a target too.
Feds created "May Zhou's suicide". A pre-distraction to a planned
murder on my daughter.(In the name of "suicide", I allege.) See detail
in "467. Attempt to murder my daughter (2/15/07)".

On 6/15, Feds arranged another big shopping spree day for me. Two days
before 6/15, they repeated their tactic by pre-distract mind
influence:
1. Re-fresh D.A. Field's discipline case. Quote, "Prosecutor's legal
woes worsen in new finding". (Mercury News, 6/12/08)
2. Quote, "(Milpitas) Serial bank robber strikes for 12th time". "FBI
officials say a serial bank robber who has hit banks in Fremont, Union
City, Milpitas and Livermore held up the Commercial Bank on South Park
Victoria Drive in Milpitas on Tuesday. (One of my two bank accounts
happened to be on that Drive too)......Anyone with information about
these incidents is asked to call the FBI at (415)553-7400". (Mercury
News, 6/13/08)

The tactic of Feds is very clear. Force me to use the "drug money"
they planted and make an arrest. If I don't do in their way and
withdraw money from the bank, then they planned a "shoot to death" for
me. Of course people are asked to call FBI if they have information.
What people don't know is the crime may have been planned by the hand
works in same office they are requested to call in. That's why the
serial robber could strike on and on. Just like Osama Bin Laden could
issue terror warning from time to time and never been captured.
Because they work for the interest of the Feds.