| 552. Setting off an earthquake is mature technique (6/14/08) |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: mn.politics · Group Profile
Author: kathaksungkathaksung Date: Jun 20, 2008 17:52
552. Setting off an earthquake is mature technique (6/14/08)
In February, Chinese New Year, when I united with my family, my
relatives gave me some cash. I think Feds planted drug money in them
to justify an arrest. Feds were so sure that they would be success to
frame the case this time that they even censored me from the internet
the following months until May 11. (They opened internet for me on May
12) To push me spending the money, they even pushed up the rice price
in April.(rice is my main food) Within days, rice price doubled.
However, I managed not to spend that money.
Now it is clear that Feds made May the month for big action. On May 3,
there was a cyclone in Burma - a pressure on Burma regime to force it
play a role of witness for coming drug case. May 11 was the action
day. It was Mother's day when family members got together to have a
dinner. My relatives rode me for a shopping trip. It used to be a big
shopping day for me since I can't drive. (no drive license) Feds must
have expected I spend the "drug money" in the shopping spree.
Everything was in proceeding except I didn't spend the money. I gave
it back to them after the shopping and expressed my fear. But I made a
mistake to take gift shoes from my brother that night. I am under
tight surveillance that Feds won't let go any chance to plant.
China was in proceeding too. Next day - May 12 - there was a magnitude
8.0 earthquake in Sichuan China. The event became a big issue which
attracts Chinese attention from domestic to abroad the following
weeks. If I spent the "drug money" on May 11, there would be a
slaughter on my relatives in China. The earthquake, was planned to
distract public's attention from these cases.
Setting off an earthquake is a mature technique. Last August Feds had
one in Peru on purpose to justify a trip accident for my family
members. Reference:
1. On 8/13/07, I wrote in #502, worried about accident: quort: "Next
day on 8/9, my wife said she would have a trip to Peru between 8/16 to
8/22. My brother and one of my sister will go with her..... One of
murder tactic of Feds is travel accident. Each big plot always came
with this program. So they prepare again the death for part of my
family members. As for me,....."
2. One day later, there was a magnitude 7.5 quake in Peru (8/15). Here
is what I wrote On 8/18. "503. Earthquake in Peru (8/18/07)
Then there was an earthquake in Peru on 8/15. Of course I view it as
part of the August plot. It would be used to justify a tour accident.
That night, I asked my wife what time tomorrow would she leave home
for Peru. She happily said, "No, we won't go. Don't you know there is
just a 7.5 earthquake in Peru?" Her happy expression revealed it was
not a trip she likes to go. I was puzzled. Was it a big coincidence
that an earthquake taken place the day before the trip? To my opinion,
the quake was created to justify a tour accident, not to cancel that
planned trip. Did I make a mistake?
I didn't make mistake. Later that night, after several call, my wife
said she still would go. She said the tour guider from Lima confirmed
nothing serious happened there. Everything was OK. She left next
morning."
Feds act aggressively these days. I worry they will apply violence on
me. It can be road accident, bombing in shopping center, fire on gas
station, robbery accident......
553. Sichuan quake used as a diversion (6/19/08)
People may doubt how can China set off a big earthquake to kill its
own citizens and made a big loss in economy. There is other side they
didn't know.
1. Government never care the lives of its own citizen when they
consider other interest is more important than people's lives. Such
story like: In World War II, British government let City Coventry be
destroyed by air bombing of German, though they knew the raid
information in advance. In 911, 3000 people killed in a false flag
attack. So was this earthquake in Sichuan, China. (There is still a
big difference from Coventry bombing to the 911 and Sichuan
earthquake. The latter two were done by its own government.)
2. I think the practice of earthquake may indicate Pentagon has
transferred the quake technique to the Chinese military. That is a big
payment. From TV and newspaper, I heard from both the news that the
military industry factories in earthquake area have got quake warning
in advance and are able to avoid from a loss. There is still no
scientific way to forecast a quake except it's an artificial one.
3. The biggest advantage for China is obvious and was reported by US
media.
Quote, " Quake mutes protests over Beijing Olympics
China reaps goodwill in wake of tragedy
By Stephen Wade, Associated Press
Beijing - China's deadly earthquake may have saved the Beijing
Olympics.
Just a few weeks ago, International Olympic Committee President
Jacques Rogge described the games as "in crisis." They were being
battered by pro-Tibet protests, health concerns about Beijing's
noxious pollution and calls for boycotts tied to China's support for
Sudan.
The May 12 earthquake changed everything. ......
After the tragedy in Sichuan province, the Games are now riding a wave
of goodwill - a feeling that the government's propaganda machine had
failed for months to generate. "
(Mercury News May 24, 2008)
4. Quick response may indicate it's a pre-prepared event. There is a
quick military response. Troops were moved in to rescue the suffering
people. There is also a quick media response.
Quote, "Activist groups grudgingly acknowledge that China's state-
controlled media - by allowing uncharacteristic openness in 24-hour
earthquake coverage - have shaped the news agenda and gained sympathy
for the catastrophe. ....
Know for this secrecy, the government has let earthquake coverage flow
more freely, with less censorship in an era of quick-moving text
messages and the Internet. ..." (Mercury News 5/24/08)
China was once a close up country, just like Burma's juntas. Does the
sudden change mean a more open government? Or as I say, it is used as
a diversion to another case.
|