|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Pies de ArcillaPies de Arcilla
Date: Jan 26, 2008 22:56
Alan Hope wrote:
> Pies de Arcilla goes:
>
>>My understanding is that the rising inequality we hear so much about
>>has come from lower middle and middle class people becoming upper
>>middle class, while the people who don't work remain poor.
>
> Then your understanding is shot to shit, and you need to get it fixed.
>
> I recommend a course of Barbara Ehrenreich, who can explain to you
> what the middle class and lower middle class are becoming.
>
> http://www.barbaraehrenreich.com/
Is she an economist or a statistician?
|
| |
|
| |
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: Pies de ArcillaPies de Arcilla
Date: Jan 26, 2008 22:56
Josh Hill wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:38:18 -0800 (PST), Pies de Arcilla
> gmail.com> wrote:
>>>On Jan 25, 7:08�pm, Josh Hill gmail.com> wrote:>>> Kosovo? Get real -- if you include every peacekeeping mission, then in
>>> no presidency is the country at peace -- which rather ignores the
>>> obvious fact that there are times when Presidents, rightly or wrongly,
>>> take us into war.
>>
>>During the Clinton administration, the U.S. bombed the Balkans, Sudan,
>>Iraq, and Afghanistan.
>>
>>Which of those were peacekeeping bombs?
>
> Two of those were peacekeeping missions, one was a mission to defend
> people who were the victim of genocide, and one was an attempt to kill
> Osama Bin Laden.
Bombs are not defensive weapons.
|
| |
|
| |
7 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: SylviaSylvia
Date: Jan 26, 2008 21:34
Miz PJ wrote:
Seven minutes after Miz Sylvia posted a reply to Miz PJ about Joshers
reading Mr. Stan's posts,
> "Ray Haddad" iexpress.net.au> replied >> Sylvia wrote:
>>
>>>Ray Haddad
>>
>> You honestly can't help yourself, can you? Oh, dear.
>
> FOITN.
>
>
Spot on, Miz PJ! He's like this huge buzzard waddlin' about, with
nuthin' better to do than to check every couple of minutes to see if I
posted so he can reply.
Weird, innit.
--
Sylvia (Watch this...)
|
| Show full article (1.27Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: SylviaSylvia
Date: Jan 26, 2008 21:19
> Sylvia wrote:
.
>> Well, Thomas, let's just say you have a hard time following
>> what's really going on, which may explain your tendency to
>> suddenly say totally off-the-wall things related to television
>> that have nothing to do with whatever you are replying to...
>> although you seem to think that they do.
Earlier in our show:
Miz Sylvia: "We now return ya to Josh's drama queen 'poor me'
whiney lies:"
.
Thomas: "I watched the Bob Newhart show every week. It was
scheduled just before or after Mary Tyler Moore.
I don't remember which. The neurotics in group
therapy were my favorite part of the show.
Miz Sylvia: "
|
| Show full article (3.82Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: KoolchickiKoolchicki
Date: Jan 26, 2008 20:50
Josh Hill wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:56:15 -0800 (PST), "Koolchicki@smurfsareus.xxx"
> wrote:
>
>
> Someone who isn't an anti-Semitic shit, one presumes.
>
You are right. He could just be an anti-Palistinian shit.Thanks
> --
> Josh
>
> "My name is not Strangelove. I don't know about Strangelove. I'm not
> interested in Strangelove. What else can I say? . . . Look, say it
> three times more, and I throw you out of this office."
>
> --Edward Teller
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: KoolchickiKoolchicki
Date: Jan 26, 2008 20:47
serenebabe wrote:
> On 2008-01-26 10:41:04 -0500, "Koolchicki@smurfsareus.xxx"
> said:
>> serenebabe wrote:
> <...>
>>> What books do you think ought to be required reading for everyone? Why?
>
>> Calvin and Hobbs. Any book.
>
> "My brother would agree. I seriously can't get into them... I find
> them in people's bathrooms and check them out."
Eweeeee. Can you picture where those have been and who's been holding
them.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: UltravioletUltraviolet
Date: Jan 26, 2008 19:54
And then serenebabe gmail.com> was all like:
<>
> This is precisely what my Josh was saying last night. I described
> my post, a little giddy, a little guilty, a little proud, a little
> childish. A little of all that stuff. Knowing that it was
> teasing/pretending...
|
| Show full article (1.71Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
