> On May 8, 1:03 am, Dan
hotmail.com> wrote:>>> On May 7, 7:27 pm, Dan
hotmail.com> wrote:>>>>> On May 6, 6:52 pm, Dan
hotmail.com> wrote:>>>>>> Winston_Smith wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 05 May 2008 21:46:56 -0700, Gunner Asch
>>>>>>>
NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:>>>>>>>> On Tue, 06 May 2008 00:07:17 GMT, Je...@
127.0.0.1 (Jerry) wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 4 May 2008 23:02:11 -0700 (PDT), Too_Many_Tools
>>>>>>>>>
yahoo.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>> Voting Democrat is voting for change.
>>>>>>>>> Communism would be a change too, but that doesn't mean that it's
>>>>>>>>> better or that you should vote for it.
>>>>>>>> Voting to kill all the Liberals would be Change as well. A welcome
>>>>>>>> one, but I hardly think TooManyFools would think it a good one.
>>>>>>>> Notice the use of the buzzword "change" by the leftards?
>>>>>>> McCain has used it repeatedly. Thank you for confirming what I have
>>>>>>> always thought - McCain is a flaming liberal.
>>>>>>> As in 2000 and 2004 we have our choice or an R liberal or a D liberal.
>>>>>> Interesting thought, since there are no liberal Republicans, and damned
>>>>>> few (if any) liberal Democrats...
>>>>>> Then again, you say that like it is a bad thing. Liberalism has never
>>>>>> been tried in any larger context, yet people are so dead set against it.
>>>>>> Gotta wonder why...
>>>>> Teach us!
>>>> I do every time I post.
>>> So tell us again about there being no liberal republicans. You have
>>> much explaining to do.
>> No explaining to do. There aren't any, not even using the Reagan
>> "L"-word definition (since they ARE Republicans).
>>
>>>>>> Probably because they actually believe what the talk show hosts say,
>>>>>> despite their never having been correct in 30 or so years.
>>>>>> Dan
>>>>> Alex Jones? Has he been around for 30 years? You must be thinking of
>>>>> Dan Rather.
>>>> Dan was a talk show host?
>>> Comedy. Dry humor delivered as if it were true.
>> It were true...
>
> I'm having a hard time with the forged documents. Maybe it's just my
> sensibilities.
What forged documents? Who forged them? How do you know they were forged?
Enquiring minds want to know...
>>>> He was a good and accurate TV talking head,
>>> Yet he will be remembered as a lying head. Do you know why?
>> Well, hardly, except by the sheep who believe the Ministry of Truth
>> propaganda. Do you work there?
>
> No. I work for the Department of Redundancy Department. I say again,
> "I'm having a hard time with the forged documents."
Again, which documents are those?
Dan
