>>These gun control freaks plan to completely ban guns one small step at
>>a time. So we must fight any and all gun control legislation, even if
>>that legislation seems reasonable.

>
> I think you have made a grave error here. I am a strong advocate for
> gun control laws and in fact belong to a nationwide organization that
> proposes such laws.

> Indeed, I am going to help see that this law is passed, as I live in
> CA and thus I have a vested interest in getting as many guns off the
> streets as I can, for my own safety as well as yours.

> SEN. HUTCHISON:  ANWR is an area the size of the state of South
> Carolina.  The part that would be drilled is an area the size of JFK
> airport or Washington National Airport or Dallas Love Field.  It's an
> area the size of an airport that would be drilled because the new
> technology allows us to drill underground for just hundreds of yards and
> you don't have to have a lot of wells to drill anymore.  But they're not
> acknowledging that.  The people of Alaska want this. They have had
> referenda. They want the jobs, they want the economic security, and they
> know it won't hurt the environment.  Yet we cannot get a bill through
> Congress that would allow drilling in that small part of ANWR.  These
> are the kinds of things that just don't make sense when the price of
> gasoline is so high.
>
> RUSH:  Ah, sadly, they do make sense if you understand Democrats.  I
> know you do.  We're talking, by the way, with Senator Kay Bailey
> Hutchison from Texas.  Now, yesterday the president made a presentation
> on energy and said much of the same thing you just said here; and
> Senator Schumer from New York went out and responded to it and said, "If
> we started drilling in ANWR today we wouldn't have a drop of oil for ten ...

> I gave up on Wikipedia as a source for environmental issues years ago.
> For example, the Peak Oil article was written by the founders of the doomday cult.
> What about Climate Change, are many articles as bad as this article claims?
>
> http://energy.probeinternational.org/climate-change/the-deniers/wikip...http://en...
>
> Wikipedia's Zealots - Lawrence Solomon
> 13 Apr 2008 - FP Comment
> As I'm writing this column for the Post, I am simultaneously editing a page on Wikipedia. I am
> confident that just about everything I write for my column will be available for you to read. I am
> equally confident that you will be able to read just about nothing that I write for the page on
> Wikipedia.
>
> The Wikipedia page is entitled Naomi Oreskes, after a Professor of History and Science Studies at
> the University of California San Diego, but the page offers only sketchy details about Oreskes. The
> page is mostly devoted to a notorious 2004 paper that she wrote, and that Science magazine
> published, called "Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change." This paper
> analyzed articles in peer-reviewed journals to see if any disagreed with the alarming positions on
> global warming taken by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. "Remarkably, ...