windows xp embedded vs non-embedded ? regarding solid state / flash drives.
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
microsoft.public.windowsxp.embedded only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

microsoft ... embedded Profile…
 Up
windows xp embedded vs non-embedded ? regarding solid state / flash drives.         


Author: jameshanley39
Date: May 29, 2008 19:16

hi

I am interested in windows xp embedded's advantages, in terms of the
issue of reading/writing to a flash "disk" drive. (I happen to be
referring to IDE flash drives, small ones like 2GB)

I notice some of them have an endurance of 1,2,4 million r/w
cycles. (or as some say, write/erase cycles). And the cheap ones only
10,000

Regarding these ones with an endurance in the millions

Would regular windows xp kill off one of these things if virtual
memory was being used?
Apparently one can run regular windows xp, without a page file.
Is there then any advantage in running Windows XP Embedded?

Is it the case that windows xp with no paging file, would still kill
off a 10,000 endurance flash disk. And so windows xp embedded, which
I hear can block all writes to the disk except when you deem then
necessary.. Apparently that will let it run nicely on it.
Show full article (1.11Kb)
4 Comments
Re: windows xp embedded vs non-embedded ? regarding solid state / flash drives.         


Author: Mike Warren
Date: May 30, 2008 05:39

jameshanley39@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> Would regular windows xp kill off one of these things if virtual
> memory was being used?

I can't specifically answer your question, but Windows is constantly
writing to the drive, even with no paging file. This problem is
overcome in XPe by using the Enhanced Write Filter or File Based Write
Filter.

--
- Mike
no comments
Re: windows xp embedded vs non-embedded ? regarding solid state / flash drives.         


Author: Sean Liming (MVP)
Date: May 30, 2008 08:07

Mike is correct about the constant reads and writes. the different filters
will help to mitigate the risk, but writes can still occur as drivers are
loaded and unloaded during startup and shutdown.

--
Regards,
Show full article (0.83Kb)
no comments
Re: windows xp embedded vs non-embedded ? regarding solid state / flash drives.         


Author: Mike Warren
Date: Jun 1, 2008 22:19

Sean Liming (MVP) wrote:
> but writes can still occur as
> drivers are loaded and unloaded during startup and shutdown.

Yes, I hope MS are giving this issue priority.

--
- Mike
no comments
RE: windows xp embedded vs non-embedded ? regarding solid state / flas         


Author: Kevin Bulgrien
Date: Aug 12, 2008 09:59

> hi
>
> I am interested in windows xp embedded's advantages, in terms of the
> issue of reading/writing to a flash "disk" drive. (I happen to be
> referring to IDE flash drives, small ones like 2GB)
>
> I notice some of them have an endurance of 1,2,4 million r/w
> cycles. (or as some say, write/erase cycles). And the cheap ones only
> 10,000
>
> Regarding these ones with an endurance in the millions
>
> Would regular windows xp kill off one of these things if virtual
> memory was being used?
> Apparently one can run regular windows xp, without a page file.
> Is there then any advantage in running Windows XP Embedded?
>
> Is it the case that windows xp with no paging file, would still kill
> off a 10,000 endurance flash disk. And so windows xp embedded, which
> I hear can block all writes to the disk except when you deem then ...
Show full article (1.00Kb)
no comments