In my debug configuration, I've appended _d for the output file name
to distinguish the binaries between debug and release. But it gave me
a warning as follows.

/OUT:filename directive in .EXP differs from output filename
'filename'; ignoring directive

I understood that it's the LIBRARY string I've given in the def file
doesn't have _d at the end caused this error. How can I resolve this
issue? I think this warning is only application for VS 2005 or
greater.

Hi freinds,

Can any tell me where can i get a simple database example.?
In which only 2 or 3 table with Foreigne key etc.
i will be very thankful to u all.
sheikh

I have old project which uses procompiled headers and the filename is
not stdafx.h but something like prefixStdAfx.h.

My ide is VS2005 SP1 Professional.

The common.js is looking for usually for the correct precompiled header
name when it is executed. But in one case it fails correctly check
check the file name, in function IsMFCProject() it looks just for
stdafx.h to contain (near line 1080 ) :

if (DoesIncludeExist(oProj, "", "stdafx.h"))

I fixed this by this, there might be better way opf doing this but
I have no extra time :-(

var strHeader = "";
strHeader = GetProjectFile(oProject, "STDAFX", true, false);
if (DoesIncludeExist(oProj, "", strHeader))

The common.js is in directory :
"\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\VC\VCWizards\1033"

If editing please take backup copy 1st.
Should this be reported through official channels also ?

Ismo

Hello,

We've been getting the following error:

c1xx : fatal error C1027: Inconsistent values for /Ym between creation and
use of precompiled header

Whenever we compile our project. What's /Ym? What does this error mean?

Will appreciate any help.

Thanks,

Avi

Hallo,

what is the right way to get an gdiplus.dll for deployment on windows 2000
sp4 installations?

We use gdiplus.dll in our app directly and so we need the right version for
your app.

I downloaded the platform sdk redist gdiplus. Inside there is a gdiplus.dll
with version 5.1.3102.5581. Is this the
right version for deployment under windows 2000 SP4, because this seems to
be the Version for
xp-SP3?

Thanks,
Dieter

Hi,

I followed the steps outlined in http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms235291.aspx
section "Deploying Visual C++ library DLLs as private assemblies" but
instead of using an external manifest file (i.e.
Microsoft.VC90.CRT.manifest) I'd like to embed it in the DLLs somehow.

What should I be doing? I tried removing Microsoft.VC90.CRT.manifest
and LoadLibrary() failed. I tried embedding the manifest into
msvcr90.dll or the DLL loading it and that failed too. Please help.

Thank you,
Gili

Hello all.

When I'm calling a method, Intellisense will usually suggest the parameter
list, so that if I press enter, it will write it for me. However, when the
parameter is either a reference or a pointer, when Intellisense writes them
it will usually place the & or * next to the variable name. That is, it will
write:

void Foo::foo(string &str) { }

instead of:

void Foo::foo(string& str) { }

Is there any way I can change this behaviour?

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Fernando.

drugstore affiliate program marketing in pharmacy best online pharmacy affiliate rx affiliate programs drugstore affiliate

+++ BEST PHARMACY AFFILIATE PROGRAM +++ BEST PHARMACY AFFILIATE PROGRAM +++
+
SPECIAL OFFER FOR NEW AFFILIATES.
GENERATE SALES OF $1000 ON YOUR FIRST MONTH AND GET $450 COMMISSIONS!
+
+
http://jhku...

VENTA de cialis Barata in Capreol Acquista cialis effettuare cialis svizzera barato en linea cialis generico cialis compra cialis cialis de Marca en Medicfarm

I have two different executables that I want to build w/ the same source but
in 2 different compilers, vs60 and vs2008. I have 2 different configurations
w/ different options etc, but I want one to be version 1.0 and another 3.0.

Anyway to do this easily using the same .rc file? I couldnt figure how to
use the condition property of the VERSION. I did this years ago, but forgot.
I tried defining a condition parameter, then adding it to the Preprocessor
definitions in the configurations, but both executables always had the same
version.

Any ideas? TIA
-C