MI5 Have. Systematically Destroyed My Life

This is. getting depressing. From the feedback Ive received, the recipients
of these faxes are tired of hearing my complaints,. and in truth I am tired
of sending them. The reason I havent yet ceased....

MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 11. June, 1999

Harassment. in a pub in Clapham, Tuesday lunchtime

Once a month,. or once every other month, I meet a Polish friends of mine
who lives. in Clapham North, and sometimes we go to a particular pub near
where he. lives. The last time was some two months ago; I did not have my
minidisc-walkman with me, and consequently was seriously harassed. by
people MI5 had instructed to harass me, in the. pub.

This Tuesday, 8 June 1999, we again went to the same pub. for a pre-meal
drink. This time. I did have my minidisc-walkman with me. As you can guess,
we. were followed into the pub by a couple of young people (Im getting
older and older. - isnt it funny how the MI5 agents all look young these
days?). They started talking about my situation, in. particular some travel
I had booked the previous. day. Unfortunately, they were talking fairly
quietly, and my minidisc didnt pick up their. speech.

MI5 are Afraid to Admit They're Behind the. Persecution

MI5 have issued a formal denial of any involvement in my. life to the
Security Service Tribunal, as. you might expect them to; but, more
importantly, the persecutors have. never denied that theyre from the
Security Service, despite several years of. accusations from my corner on
usenet. and in faxed articles. I am not surprised that the Security Service
Tribunal found. "no determination in your favour". I am however a little
surprised that the persecutors have refused to. confirm my identification
of them; by doing. so, they implicitly admit that my guess was right.

"No determination in your favour" says the. Security Service Tribunal

In 1997, I made a complaint. to the Security Service Tribunal, giving only
the bare outlines of my case. I do not think it would have made. very much
difference if Id made a. much more detailed complaint, since the Tribunal
has no ability to perform. investigatory functions. It can only ask MI5 if
they have an interest in a subject, to which MI5 are of course. free to be
"economical with the truth". A couple. of months after my complaint the
Tribunal replied. that;

MI5 Persecution:. Molestation during Travel

MI5s persecution of me varies in intensity. Since 1990 it has. been steady
for perhaps 80%% of the time; there was a notable quiet period in 1993,. and
another quiet period in Jan-Feb 1995, as. well as a hiatus in the first two
months of 1999. It puzzles. me that they cease and restart, seemingly
without any logic. or reason. But one aspect of MI5s activities against me
which is relatively predictable is this. weeks articles topic, which is
Molestation during Travel. Almost every time. I cross the Atlantic, go to
the Continent or even try to enjoy a holiday in. this country, you can bet
that. MI5 will be there doing their utmost to wreck it all.

This aspect of the harassment. is particularly relevant as I will be
travelling to. Europe again in a months time, with naturally the Minidisc
recorder in tow; so. it will be interesting to see if I can record the
abuse which will almost certainly take place,. either on the Tube going to
the airport, at the airport, on the. flight, in the terminal building - MI5
have previously instituted instances of. abuse at each of these locations,
so well see how much taxpayers money they waste this time, and. whether it
will prove possible. to capture their abuse on minidisc.

Read about. the MI5 Persecution on the Web

Hi
WMI class Win32_DiskDrive has a property Signature and it correctly shows
disk signature for MBR disks.
However for GPT disks this filed is null. (Since GPT signature is GUID and
Signature property is of type INT32 it is
not possible to show it here anyway). Is there any other new WMI class to
represent GPT disks?

BTW, I am using Windows 2008.

Thanks and Regards
jas

MI5 Persecution: BBC. Newscasters Lie & Deny They're Watching Me

Central to the persecution campaign waged against me for some. nine years
now by the Security Service is their use of the media,. and in particular
the broadcast media, to make clear to me. that I am under surveillance and
being watched within my own home, even by BBC newscasters while they. read
the news. This is really an act of arrogance;. MI5 and their tools in the
television and radio are so sure that they can. never be caught, that they
have many times made explicity clear on. broadcast programmes that they are
as. capable of seeing me as I am of seeing the broadcast pictures. Even
when. they have known I am taping the programmes they still carry on this
practice; for examples of TVand radio. presenters caught "in action", see
the Evidence area. of my website.

If you wish to reply to this. article......
then please include your name and fax number! I. provide the means for
recipients to send me their thoughts on the topics discussed,. but ask that
you provide me with your fax number or email address if you require. a
response. Also would you please send not more than one or two pages, if. by
fax.. Thank-you!

It started with a. Newscaster, and it continues with Newscasters today

Four Years of "MI5. Persecution" Posts on Internet Newsgroups

For approximately the first three years of the MI5 persecution,. from June
1990 until late 1992, I kept as quiet as possible,. in the hope that by not
reacting, MI5s interest. in me would decrease and they would simply go away
of their own accord. This is the sort of behaviour some people. employ
against bullies;. if the bullies arent getting a reaction, then they might
simply go away and. victimize someone else.

Unfortunately, this tactic didnt work. The quieter I became,. the more
shrill and hysterical the noise from the Security. Service operatives. For
about two years I didnt. watch TV news at all. Yet this only heightened
their obsessed fixation; they continued. to follow me wherever I went, they
continued to. induce harassment at work by managers and fellow workers, and
they continued to encourage. me to commit suicide. They seemed to regard my
refusal to react as a crime which they would have to "put right". by ever
more extreme. forms of abuse.

MI5 Persecution Update:. Friday 30 April, 1999

If You. Intend To Reply, Please Read This
Please.... keep your response to one page!.. Faxes over a page or two will
be deleted. without being read.

Somewhere between 0. and 100%%

The last few days there. have been no clear recordable instances of
abuse. However, while. travelling on the Underground, while walking around
near my home and going to friends homes, I am. constantly troubled by
thoughts that those people over there. might be about to get at me; that
the couple sitting in. the opposite seats laughing are in fact laughing at
me;. et cetera, et cetera.

A comment by a scientist. to the BSE inquiry sticks in my mind. He
described the possible. scale of the epidemic as "between 0%% and 100%%". It
might not be happening, it might not happen. at all, to any discernable
degree.... or. it might be total. Without clear recording, which seems to
have become. impossible the last couple of weeks, there is no way of
knowing whether the harassment really is continuing,. whether we have
entered a temporary hiatus, or whether perhaps. it has perhaps stopped for
now.

MI5 Persecution Update: Friday. 16 April, 1999

If. You Intend To Reply, Please Read This
Please.... keep. your response to one page!. Faxes over a page or two will
be deleted without. being read.

BBC newscaster Nicholas Witchell cant stop himself. laughing

During 1990-91 there were very. many instances of "interactive
television" where newscasters and other TV presenters saw. on a screen
before them what. was happening in my home, and reacted, frequently by
laughing at me. During this period I unfortunately. did not record these
programmes.. For the last year or two, I have been recording everything I
watch, and there has been a drastic decrease. in such incidents.

However, on occasion, television presenters do still. engage in
"interactive watching" and react to what they see. This has. been evident
with Jon Snow of Channel Four News recently - a particularly. interesting
case, since it has been established that he cannot be. corrupted by money
(it is well-documented that MI5 offered him a tax-free. salary and he
turned them down). I wonder what device MI5 are using to encourage him. to
do. the "interactive watching"?

I am preparing to rollout DFS + FSRM in our environment. The environment
consists of 2 file servers at the central site + 2 branch offices each with a
single AD/File Server. All servers are running W2K3 Standard R2 SP2.

1. Is it possible to deploy FSRM on ONE of the cental office file servers to
deploy/manage quotas and file screens across the organization file servers
(including the branch offices)? Or would it make sense to have (1) FSRM role
at the central site + (1) FSRM role at each branch office that are basically
managed individually?

2. Since DFS is going to be rolled out at the same time, is it better to set
the quotas and file screens with FSRM on the actual file share
(\\servername\site_shares\users) or is it safe to set the quotas on the DFS
path (\\company.local\sitename\users)?

Thanks,