Sorry I've taken so long to get back to y'all.
Yes it did transfer direct to Outlook - but not in the same thread or
perhaps not even the same process.
After having my dinner, I sat down to figure it out - I soon discovered,
that my pst file had ballooned from a paltry 1.8MB, to a bloated 213MB, and
there in Outlook was all the stuff from WLMail - 4 times over, that's how
many reruns I did.
Thanks for all your help
--
TUT
"Progress always involves risk; you can't steal second base and keep your
foot on first." -- Frederick Wilcox
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Diane Poremsky {MVP}"
msn.com> wrote in message
news:DDFDD8D1-DF30-4B65-A781-80233B69DF53@microsoft.com...
>> Thank you -
>>
>> OK I export from Windows Live Mail using the
>> File->Export->Messages->Microsoft Exchange (the confirm dialogue does in
>> fact say MS Exchange and MS Outlook), I select the folders I wanted
>> exported - basically everything except some feeds, news stuff etc, I
>> expected to be asked where I'd like the output stored, but no -- it went
>> off with fast moving progress bars for a few minutes and ended -
>> gracefully.
>>
>> I cant see anything in my documents folder, nor in WLMails Mail Store -
>> but I am not sure what it is I'm looking for.
>>
>> I looked for pst's but Locate32 only finds two fairly small ones in
>> C:\Documents and Settings\myname\Local Settings\Application
>> Data\Microsoft\Outlook\. Search Assist finds the same .pst's in the same
>> locations.
>>
>> When I export in WLMail format, (ie .eml's) then I am asked for an output
>> folder name and then I get to select which folders, and then the fast
>> moving progress bars do there stuff and I get everything dumped into the
>> folder I specified. I ran a before after snapshot of my drives and I can
>> see where the exported data is written down to the specific sector.
>>
>> When I export in Exchange format then as far as I can tell WLMail is not
>> writing anything, its reading its mail store but its not writing anything
>> according to the disk snap shots and looking at the file handles with
>> Process Explorer I can se anything that looks like file writes. and the
>> export to Exchange is quite a lost faster than the export to eml files -
>> because its not actually writing anything I suspect.
>>
>> I'll shake the rattle over at m.p.w.live.mail.desktop and see if one of
>> those guys knows what the story is with export to Exchange.
>>
>> Outlook as a browser : I think it's the word that worries some people -
>> browser. In the context of Outlook I see it as a transactor, whereas in
>> the context of the WordWeb applet I use - I see it as a finder. I
>> appreciate the attitudes of the corporate world, I was in it for long
>> enough - but I brike free, or rather they pensioned me off.
>>
>> On the issue of long downloads etc, when I say long I mean several hours
>> over a flaky satellite link with a single stream, believe me you don't
>> want to disturb the browser. Here in the city I have 20Mps to the
>> exchange about 600m distance, nothings a problem. If I do do long
>> downloads over the sat link and I just have to do some browsing then I
>> just use a different browser.
>> --
>> TUT
>>
>> "Right now I'm having amnesia and deja vu at the same time. I think I've
>> forgotten this before." Steven Wright
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> "Diane Poremsky {MVP}" msn.com> wrote in message
>> news:#khDvVG8IHA.2064@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>> you'll want to export to exchange format - that is outlook. no idea why
>>> they call it exchange, not outlook though.
>>>
>>> browsing capabilities was added to outlook years ago when someone
>>> thought it would be a good idea- then they discovered its not secure and
>>> businesses wanted more control over employees browsing habits. they
>>> can't remove the hooks because they need it for outlook today and folder
>>> homepages but they do have it locked down some.
>>>
>>> FWIW, I've never had problems disturbing downloads when I use tabbed
>>> browsing.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
>>> Need Help with Common Tasks?
http://www.outlook-tips.net/beginner/
>>> Outlook 2007:
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/ol2007/
>>>
>>> Outlook Tips by email:
>>> dailytips-subscribe-request@
lists.outlooktips.net
>>>
>>> Exchange Messaging Outlook newsletter:
>>> EMO-NEWSLETTER-SUBSCRIBE-REQUEST@
PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
>>>
>>> Outlook Tips:
http://www.outlook-tips.net/
>>> Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center:
http://www.slipstick.com
>>>
>>> You can access this newsgroup by visiting
>>>
http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx or point
>>> your newsreader to
msnews.microsoft.com.
>>>
>>>
>>> "Urbane Tiger"
a.com> wrote in message
>>> news:#FZaeJG8IHA.1080@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>> Thanks for the feedback, BTW I did not do much head scratching - I
>>>> looked, I could not see, so I asked for guidance.
>>>>
>>>> Re : Migration,
>>>>
>>>> WLMail can export messages in Microsoft Exchange or Microsoft Windows
>>>> Live Mail formats, the latter is the .eml format mentioned in my OP.
>>>> The only import formats I can see in Outlook are Outlook Express and
>>>> Eudora, I'm surprised its such a sparse list. WLMail supports
>>>> importation of Exchange, Outlook, OE, Windows Mail and its own formats
>>>> (no non MS formats, but all the MS formats of which I am aware). Are
>>>> there any addons that will read Exchange format messages into Outlook..
>>>>
>>>> With respect to accounts, I can do those by hand no need for import
>>>> there. For Contacts WLMail can produce .vcf's and Outlook can import
>>>> vcf's - but one at a time, is there a bulk import for vcf's - the one
>>>> at a time works fine, but it's a bit tedious.
>>>>
>>>> Re Browser
>>>>
>>>> Firstly, Outlook invoked Firefox "out of the box", I did not have to do
>>>> anything to make that happen. That's because Outlook invokes the
>>>> default browser, which is exactly what it should do -- I wish all apps
>>>> were as well behaved in this regard.
>>>>
>>>> I get quite a lot of emails that require the completion of a simple
>>>> transaction over HTTP. For example, my mail service provider sends a
>>>> message when they quarantine a suspected spam item; the message has a
>>>> link to their spam filter login page, I enter my id and password
>>>> whereupon the item header is displayed, I can elect to move it to my
>>>> inbox, delete it, or blacklist the sender and/or domain and then delete
>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to conclude the transaction within the context of Outlook.
>>>> Which in fact I can, RightClick->CopyLink on the link, move mouse to
>>>> Document Location, RightClick->Paste, hit Enter - bingo the page is
>>>> right there in front of me. I was wondering if I could get Outlook do
>>>> that with a LeftClick, rather than invoking my browser. Firstly the
>>>> browser may not be running, which means I have to wait for it to load,
>>>> perhaps wait while it installs some extension updates, decide whether
>>>> or not I want to restore yesterdays session, by which time I've
>>>> forgotten why I am where I am.. Alternatively the browser might be in
>>>> the middle of a large non restartable download from a site that forbids
>>>> download managers, in that circumstance I'd prefer not to disturb the
>>>> browser in order to deal with a potentially junk email.
>>>>
>>>> <
>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That begs the question, why did MSFT put hooks to the Trident layout
>>>> engine into Outlook, why did they make Outlook, HTML and HTTP aware,
>>>> why did they make Outlook capable of hosting Flash and Silverlight and
>>>> goodness knows what else, and why did they endow Outlook with a Web
>>>> toolbar? I suggest they did all that so that fools like me could use a
>>>> browser from within their email client. After all Opera and Seamonkey
>>>> do a mail client in their browsers, so why shouldn't MSFT do a browser
>>>> in their mail client - it actually make more sense to me, than the mail
>>>> in a browser trick
>>>>
>>>> I don't mean any offence, but I suggest if looks like a browser, smells
>>>> like a browser, and walks like a browser, then it probably is a
>>>> browser. Albeit not one in which I'd go surfing, but for a quick
>>>> interaction, resulting from a link in an email.- even by hand I'll use
>>>> Outlook's built in browser in preference going into a fully fledged
>>>> browser.
>>>> --
>>>> TUT
>>>>
>>>> "Progress always involves risk; you can't steal second base and keep
>>>> your foot on first." -- Frederick Wilcox
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> "Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]" wrote in message
>>>> news:e1QOCrA8IHA.3724@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>>> Outlook cannot read .eml files. What export options does WLM have that
>>>>> are compatible with Outlook?
>>>>>
>>>>> As for Outlook as a web browser, it is not one nor should be used as
>>>>> one. If you are asking how to make FF the default browser when links
>>>>> are clicked in Outlook, Control Panel->Add/Remove Programs->Set
>>>>> Program Access and Default.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --