Well, both Outlook settings were already as you suggest in your instructions.
Ouch... Kill all of my rules. That would hurt. I have about 30 of them. Are
you suggesting deleting them and reentering/importing them, or just removing
them completely?
I guess that I could export them and run Outlook like that for a while to
see if it works better.
I used to use 'stop after processing' on most of them, but there were
problems. Basically I have a bunch of rules that do some move messages
around. Then, there is a final rulle, that makes a backup copy of all mail
that a previous rule did not already process. Even messages that were 'moved'
were still being backed up at the end. So, I set a category of 'NoBackup' is
each rule and backup all messages except those with the NoBackup category.
Works well, but, if you are correct, may be my problem.
--
Paul Maia
"Nikki Peterson" wrote:
> Wow, you have alot goin on and it sounds like your rules are
> causing you some pain.
>
> You may want to see if the meetings that are not processing
> correctly are being moved by a rule that is set for something
> like "Move all messages from Frank into my pst".
>
> If Frank sends you a meeting request, it will probably not
> process correctly because the rule does not see Meetings as
> something special. They just see Frank. (Does this make any
> sense?)
>
> You may have also played with your OPTIONS a bit and it
> could be that you have set your options to do something like
> "Save all messages with their original message" or similar.
>
> I would almost suggest that you just delete your rules, and
> reset your options, and start fresh.
>
> To clear up the auto processing of messages to save them with
> their original email try doing the following:
>
> Open Outlook and select from the menu:
>
> - TOOLS
> - OPTIONS
> - E-MAIL OPTIONS... Button
> - Turn on the check mark next to "Save copies of messages in Sent
> Items folder".
>
> Now Click the ADVANCED E-MAIL OPTIONS... Button
> - Turn OFF the check mark next to "In folders other than the Inbox, save
> replies with original message"
>
> After you do this, see if the problem seems better or if it made no
> difference at all. If no difference was made, then I would start looking
> very closely at the rules you have built and really think about what they
> are doing. Also, rules run in the order they show, this means that the
> first rule will fire first, then the second (if you have not said to stop
> after
> processing).
>
> Let me know if this makes sense or if you need more clarification.
>
> Nikki Peterson
>
> "pmaia"
discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:A2472939-8061-41FC-B296-6B27D34B393B@microsoft.com...