RE: Save vs Delete (formerly RE: Why oh why would you do things like t
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
microsoft.public.outlook.bcm only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
RE: Save vs Delete (formerly RE: Why oh why would you do things like t         

Group: microsoft.public.outlook.bcm · Group Profile
Author: DavidR
Date: Aug 6, 2007 16:50

Compiling my list of "why, oh why's" took an awfully long time, and it's
unclear if any of them will ever be addressed (or have even been acknowledged
by those who could do something about them...). So, I'm glad to hear that at
least one person has found something that may make things better...

Let's hope that sometime not too far down the road, we can conclude that BCM
was worth the time and expense...
--
David

"Jan" wrote:
> DavidR,
>
> Thank you for raising all these points, no aggravations, with BCM. I am only
> just learning that my purchase may have been a waste of money.
>
> The 'bug' that I want to raise, is the why, oh, why would MS put the save
> and the delete button right beside each other without, as you say having a
> check box appear, or at least an 'undo' option available.
>
> It took me a while to realize that I had not saved a contact, but actually
> deleted it! Bingo. Gone. And I didn't even know it. When I think about how
> much information I store in my contacts, it makes me want to weep.
>
> Thank you for letting me know about the deleted files option. Never thought
> to look.
>
> Jan
>
>
> "DavidR" wrote:
>
>> I have been struggling with BCM since shortly after the 2007 release and been
>> keeping a log of things that just don't seem right. Pardon the length of this
>> post, but there's so much that needs fixing. Please consider the following
>> thoughts for future releases:
>>
>> - THIS IS A BIG ONE: I can’t understand why there isn’t a one-to-one
>> correspondence between appointments displayed under the Communications
>> History window and the (monthly) Calendar. What’s the point of deleting an
>> appointment in the Communications History window and having it stay on the
>> Calendar?? Or editing an appointment in one of these two places and not have
>> the changes appear IMMEDIATELY in the other. Recurring appointments seem to
>> be particularly prone to this lack of consistency. THIS IS A VERY SERIOUS
>> CONCERN – I bill my clients based on what I see in BCM, and I’ve already
>> suffered considerable invoicing embarrassment due to “one-sided” edits of my
>> schedule. I don’t care if the calendar is controlled by Outlook and the
>> Communications History is controlled by BCM…to not have these two important
>> sources of information be in total “sync” is simply nerve-racking,
>> inadequate, and unacceptable!! Alternatively, having to go to both the
>> Communications History and the Calendar to ensure synchronicity is a total
>> duplication of effort.
>> - Can’t seem to save a customized view (always goes back to default upon
>> re-opening BCM??)
>> - Why are dropdown lists (like the “Snooze” dropdown in the Reminders
>> window) setup to only show the first several choices, often requiring
>> additional mouse clicks to scroll down to select other available options?
>> - Why is it that when you have a recurring item and receive a reminder for
>> the current instance, if you delete the reminder (as in something that
>> doesn’t require the creation of a “history”), the open reminder window
>> immediately launches a reminder for the next instance of the recurring
>> activity? These recurring reminders could be set to occur once a month, and
>> if they don’t require any lead time to complete or prepare for, why should
>> you have to now “snooze” this next instance of the reminder back to the date
>> for which it was originally intended?
>> - Building on the previous point, the recurring appointments in BCM are, for
>> me, unusable. I have clients who I see at the same day and time each week,
>> and in ACT! 6.0, I was able to setup an appropriate recurring appointment. In
>> BCM, when working with a recurring appointment, the client’s (i.e., Business
>> Contact’s) Communications History window only shows the last instance of the
>> recurring appointments, even though I may have placed unique information in
>> other occurrences of the recurring appointment (for instance, numbered them
>> so that I can determine when the client has exhausted his/her pre-paid
>> sessions and needs to renew…). Until I reach the last appointment in the
>> recurring series, there’s no indication in the Communications History window
>> that I have an ongoing commitment to fulfill. These customized intervening
>> recurring appointments should be displayed in the Communications History and
>> on the calendar as the customizations indicate that something unique and
>> meaningful will be associated with each of these appointments.
>> - As a workaround for the unusable recurring appointment feature (as
>> explained above), I’ve tried efficiently handling my recurring appointment
>> needs by simply creating a non-recurring appointment, saving it while keeping
>> the new appointment window open (i.e., not using “Save & Close”), then
>> changing the date and making any other edits in the appointment details for
>> the next instance of the appointment, then saving, etc. This also results in
>> loss of appointments intermediate to the current and last instance of the
>> series…no help there!
>> - If you inadvertently use “Delete” rather than “Remove” in an attempt to
>> delete an appointment in the Communications History window, you end up
>> accidentally deleting the entire contact record. Although I now know that you
>> can retrieve the record from the Deleted Files folder, it totally escapes me
>> as to why there’s no “Are you sure you want to delete this contact” message
>> to help avert the disaster. If you want to delete an appointment (a much less
>> potentially destructive action), it asks you to confirm the delete…where’s
>> the consistency??
>> - For windows showing history items, the linked Contact’s name should be
>> visible on screen and his/her record accessible via a single mouse click. The
>> current way of getting to the Contact record is unreasonably circuitous. The
>> same point holds true for displays of Reminders.
>> - Importing Contact records from ACT!6 (in my case) can only be brought in
>> as BCM Contact records, not Accounts (the drop-down menu had “Accounts”
>> greyed-out). As a self-employed person in a service business, I’m going to
>> have to manually duplicate several hundred Business Contact records as
>> Account records to take advantage of Accounting Express-BCM billing/invoicing
>> synergy. It’s hard to see how this could overall be considered a
>> time-saver??? This was one of the features that I felt would make the
>> painfully laborious transition from ACT! to BCM worth it…
>> - Why does there have to be so much ledding between printed lines on the
>> monthly calendar? You can’t fit more than 4 appointments on for a given day
>> without printing in 6-point type size or smaller, an eye strain nightmare!
>> Even at 6-point type, you can only fit 6 appointments, which isn’t an
>> extraordinary number of commitments to have for a single day…
>> - Can’t seem to save a toolbar setup (Adobe Acrobat-related buttons keeps
>> coming back, taking up a whole horizontal line of screen space…)
>> - If you open a recurring reminder and choose “Delete” within the new
>> window, it asks if you wish to delete the entire recurring series or just the
>> current instance of the series. If you simply right-click the same recurring
>> reminder in the pop-up Reminders window, and choose “Delete,” the recurring
>> reminder is deleted with no choice as to whether you wish to delete that
>> instance of the reminder, or the entire recurring reminder series. Which one
>> was it? I still don’t know. I don’t understand these inconsistencies…
>> - In the “Activity by Contacts” Report, it would be much more helpful if the
>> “Comments” field included word-wrap so that a hardcopy of extensive notes
>> could be created. As it stands now, any lengthy notes are cut off, the
>> missing part represented by “…”
>> - Reinforcing a recent thread in the BCM Discussion Group: BCM needs an
>> easy, reliable means for backing up ALL of the important data in ONE step.
>> Having to backup E-mails separately because they’re “under Outlook” is
>> totally absurd…and an accident waiting to happen (I’m still not totally
>> secure that I’m backing up all of my irreplaceable information should my hard
>> drive fail…)
>> - Reinforcing another recent thread: The data conversion from Act! and
>> Goldmine?) is marginal at best it took me WEEKS to restore the fields that
>> were supposed to come over, but didn’t. I’ll NEVER be able to restore all of
>> the correct dates for past appointments that were reset by BCM to the date I
>> did the data conversion…
>> - There’s been mention in the Discussion Group that E-mail addresses aren’t
>> “blind” when doing E-mail marketing campaigns. If that’s true, then the lack
>> of blinding renders the E-mail campaign function unusable.
>> - Reinforcing a recent thread: The BCM Discussion Group thread notification
>> system need to be fixed! For me, when I see a question mentioned that I’d
>> like to follow, despite having registered with “Windows Live” and used the
>> proper IDs and passwords, when request to be notified of replies, I get the
>> error message, “Notification failed. Please try later.” At the request of
>> the Microsoft Help representative, I spent an hour and a half documenting
>> this bug, complete with the requested screen shots of the problem. And how
>> was I rewarded for my work? The return E-mail explained that Microsoft is
>> aware of this problem and is working on it. That was five months ago…
>> - Some “fixes” proposed by Microsoft in the BCM Discussion Group talk about
>> editing XML and Visual Basic code – how is that accessible to the average end
>> user??
>> - How are “built-in” fields like “Gender” to be used if you can’t add them
>> to the BCM Contact Form?
>> - Why does the Contacts window always default to Outlook Contacts (and not
>> allow setting Business Contacts or Accounts as the default?
>> - How can Microsoft call BCM and Accounting Express “integrated” when only
>> invoices and not debits are available using the BCM-Office
>> Accounting/Express link?? Furthermore, I bill my Business Contacts/individual
>> clients, not Accounts/corporate entities, so the “integration” isn’t
>> appropriate and sensitive to the needs of numerous small business owners,
>> especially those in personal service industries like I am (despite the fact
>> that BCM/Accounting are marketed heavily to small businesses…)
>> - Why can’t the BCM windows remember the last size they were at (e.g.,
>> maximized) rather than having to resize them every time they’re opened?
>> - There doesn’t appear to be a way of printing detailed notes on a Contact
>> (fields on printed forms don’t word wrap??). Except for the Comments field
>> (and notably excluding Business Notes, which would seem to be the appropriate
>> place to be able to do this), you can’t display long notes on screen, either.
>> - Inconsistent use of the terms “Remove” (the button on the left) and
>> “Delete” (when you right click a specific task/entry) in the Communications
>> History window. They seem to do the same thing…why not use the same phrase??
>> After all, “Delete” and “Remove” could have different effects, but that
>> doesn’t appear to be true in this case…
>> - The default selection in the Reminders window is at the bottom of the
>> list. If you have a lot of reminders due, this means you need to scroll to
>> the bottom of a long list in an already “shallow” (i.e., only allows you to
>> see several entries at one time) window. Why the wasted time? Why not default
>> to the top of the reminders due list? Also, why are there two different ways
>> by which the reminders are highlighted (i.e., a pale vs a bright highlight
>> bar)? They seem to respond the same, but this causes unnecessary
>> inconsistency.
>> - Finally…since the software industry has abandoned use of manuals, it’s
>> true that for some of my concerns, there may be answers…but how is the user
>> to know?? The BCM online Help is mediocre at best.
>>
>> If I can be of any service in clarifying any of the above points, I'd be
>> happy to assist. Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> David
>>
>> ----------------
>> This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
>> suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
>> Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
>> link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
>> click "I Agree" in the message pane.
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx?mid=fd9ead15-523a-44d7...
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!