> The ability to tag a parent item (highest level list item) is there.
> However, the tag does not flow to its child levels. While this may
> not always be desired (properties dialog selectable would be great)
> for the most part: the children levels of a numbered or bulleted
> list retain their base meaning in real life. (A "discussion" tag
> on a parent, I'm quite certain, would normally include discussing
> the entire topic as outlined by the user.) I hope this reads
> correctly... let me try an example:
>
> A. Tasks today
> 1. Inventory of widgets is low.
> a. Bob hasn't ordered in time
> b. Existing stock needs sorted
> 1. Some have defects..reason.....
> 2. Good ones do exist
> 2. End of Microsoft OneNote trial is this week...purchase!!
> 3. Groceries
> a. Bread
> b. Milk
> c. Eggs
> d. Energy drink (for late night programming...)
>
> If you tag list item A.1 with a "discuss with person A" tag, items
> A.1.a, A.1.b, A.1.b.1, A.1.b.2 should all inheret the same tag. We
> don't need a separate tag icon or instance just because each
> included thought is on a different line. (Opinion.)
>
> The same goes with the grocery list. You're going to want to buy
> everything, once you fired up your gas-guzzler to go buy it, right?
>
> Now, in some cases the ability to put discreet tags on any level of
> an outline makes perfect sense. However, the ability to "inheret"
> tags from higher levels makes more sense than not for many of lifes
> "normal" activities.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
>
> ----------------
> This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to
> the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion,
> click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see
> the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the
> Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the
> message pane.
>
>