MI5 Have. Systematically Destroyed My Life

This is getting. depressing. From the feedback Ive received, the recipients
of these faxes are. tired of hearing my complaints, and in truth I am tired
of sending them. The reason I havent yet ceased....

MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 11. June, 1999

Harassment in a. pub in Clapham, Tuesday lunchtime

Once a month, or once every other month, I. meet a Polish friends of mine
who lives in Clapham North, and sometimes we go to. a particular pub near
where. he lives. The last time was some two months ago; I did not have my
minidisc-walkman with me, and consequently was seriously harassed. by
people MI5 had instructed to. harass me, in the pub.

This Tuesday, 8 June 1999, we again went to the same pub. for a pre-meal
drink. This time I did have my minidisc-walkman with. me. As you can guess,
we. were followed into the pub by a couple of young people (Im getting
older and older - isnt it funny how the. MI5 agents all look young these
days?). They started talking about my. situation, in particular some travel
I had booked the previous day. Unfortunately, they were. talking fairly
quietly, and my minidisc didnt pick up their. speech.

MI5 are Afraid to Admit They're. Behind the Persecution

MI5 have issued a formal. denial of any involvement in my life to the
Security Service Tribunal, as you might. expect them to; but, more
importantly, the persecutors. have never denied that theyre from the
Security Service, despite several years of accusations from. my corner on
usenet and in faxed articles. I am. not surprised that the Security Service
Tribunal found "no determination in your. favour". I am however a little
surprised that the persecutors have. refused to confirm my identification
of them;. by doing so, they implicitly admit that my guess was right.

"No determination in your. favour" says the Security Service Tribunal

In 1997, I made a complaint to the Security Service Tribunal, giving. only
the bare outlines of my case. I do not think it. would have made very much
difference if. Id made a much more detailed complaint, since the Tribunal
has no ability. to perform investigatory functions. It can only ask MI5 if
they have an interest in a subject, to which MI5 are. of course free to be
"economical with the truth". A couple of months after. my complaint the
Tribunal replied. that;

MI5. Persecution: Molestation during Travel

MI5s persecution of me varies in. intensity. Since 1990 it has been steady
for perhaps 80%% of the time; there. was a notable quiet period in 1993, and
another quiet. period in Jan-Feb 1995, as well as a hiatus in the first two
months of 1999.. It puzzles me that they cease and restart, seemingly
without any logic or reason. But one aspect of MI5s. activities against me
which is relatively predictable is. this weeks articles topic, which is
Molestation during Travel. Almost every. time I cross the Atlantic, go to
the Continent or. even try to enjoy a holiday in this country, you can bet
that MI5 will be there doing their utmost to. wreck it all.

This aspect of the harassment is particularly relevant as. I will be
travelling to Europe again in a months. time, with naturally the Minidisc
recorder in tow; so it will be interesting to see if I can. record the
abuse which. will almost certainly take place, either on the Tube going to
the airport, at the airport,. on the flight, in the terminal building - MI5
have previously instituted instances of abuse. at each of these locations,
so well see how much taxpayers money they waste this time, and. whether it
will prove. possible to capture their abuse on minidisc.

Read about the MI5 Persecution on the. Web

MI5 Persecution: .net Magazine Applauds my Website

The March 1998 issue (number 42) of .net Magazine reviews the MI5
Persecution website describing it as an "excellent site". The webpages
describe in detail the nature of my persecution since 1990 by what are
believed to be elements of the UK security service.

(snip image)

You are encouraged to read the web pages which include

o a FAQ section outlining the nature of the persecutors, their methods
of harassment through the media, people at work and among the general public
o an evidence section, which carries audio and video clips of media and
workplace harassment, rated according to how directly I think they refer to me
o factual descriptions of the state security agencies involved
o scanned texts of the complaints I have made to media and state security agencies involved
o posts which have been made to netnews over the last three years on this topic

12771

MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 15 May, 1998

The persecution has been quite severe for the last week. It appears that
my enemies are reacting to the steady stream of faxes making their way
over the Atlantic to the fax machines of Westminster politicians and the
media. Here is whats happened in the last few days;

The week started off with an incident in the cafeteria at a local shopping
centre where I habitually drink my morning coffee. My enemies have
concentrated since winter 1995/96 on throwing a particularly horrible
sexual slander against me. They "put people up" to repeat this slander
against me, and this is what happened again here.

On Thursday morning (yesterday), instead of going to the usual cafeteria I
went to a nearby convenience store for coffee. The same horrible sexual
slander was shouted at me very loudly by a member of staff as I walked
into the store. This was the first time I had ever bought morning coffee
in that shop. The other staff obviously knew what was going on, one of
them said, "they screwed up my life".

The fax gateway I use to send these faxes to the UK has been working hard
these last few days to shut down my access by barring the accounts I use
to send these faxes.

Why do you think MI5 are responsible?

The question of who is ultimately responsible for this eight-year
harassment is one which is very difficult to answer, as the persecutors
have never clearly made their identities known to the persecutee. However,
I believe I am correct in attributing the continuing victimisation to
elements of the British Security Service MI5, and in this article, I will
try to explain the reasons for this belief.

The British internet magazine ".net" featured my website on page 17 of
their March 1998 issue (number 42). Their review kindly describes it as an
"excellent site" and gives some details of what the net surfer will find
there. Should you wish to reply to this article you can do so;

"When did you first suspect MI5 were responsible?"

Over Easter 1995 I went to see a local solicitor in London with a view to
talking to the police about the harassment. Soon afterwards I did go to my
local police station in Clapham and spoke to an officer there. The
solicitor made a comment which suggested to me that the persecution I had
been experiencing may have been organised by an intelligence service.

441712192872 nyyyyyYnnnnnYYYEYYYYYYYYYYYnyyynyynnynyynyyyyy
441712192873 yyyyyyYyyyyyyNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnNnnnnnnnn
441712192879 yyyyyyYnyyyyyYYYYYEYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyynyny
441712192905 yyyyyyYyyyynnYYYYNNNNNYYNYEYynyyynyyyyyyynyyyyy
441712192912 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYEYYEEYYYYYYEYyyyyynyyyyyyyynyyyy
441712192921 nyyyyyYyynyynEYYYYYYYYYEEYNYynnnnnynnynynyyyyyy
441712192949 yyyyyyYyyynynYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyynn
441712192957 yyyyyyYyyyyynYYYEYYYYYYYYYEYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712192965 ynyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYNYYYYYyynynyyynynyyyyyyyy
441712192969 ynnnnnYnnyyyyYNEEYYNYNEYEYNYnnnynyyyynNnyynnyny
441712192991 ynnyyyYyyyyynYYEEYYYYYYYEYYYynyyyynynnnEnnnnnnB
441712193000 nnynynNynnnnnNNNNYNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnNnnnnnnnn
441712193010 yyyyyyYyynynyNYYEYEYYYYEYYNYyyynnnnyynNnynnnyny
441712193047 yyyyyyYynyyyyYYYYYYEYYYYYYYEyyyynyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712193085 yyyyyyNyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712193373 yyyyyyEyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYEYyyyyynyyynnYnnnnnnB
441712193382 yyyyyyYyyyynyYYEYYYYYYYYEYEYnnnyynnyyyyyynnnyy
441712193398 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYEYYYEYYYYyyyyyyynyyyyyyynyyy
441712193434 nyyyyyYyynyyyYYYYYEYNYYYYYYYynyyynnnyyyyyyyynyy
441712193496 ynyyyyYnnnynnNYEYNYEYYYYYYYEyyyynnnnnnyynnyyyyy ...

Faxes Sent to British Media logs

During the 1998-2000 period my records indicate that I sent at least 6,137 faxes to the British media,
of which 5,775 went via TPC's email-to-fax service and 362 were sent via fax-modem direct from my computer.
The actual figure is obviously higher since, for most of this period, whenever a recipient asked to be deleted
from my mailing list, I totally wiped all entries including that from the logfile.

In the records "Y" indicates successful transmission from fax-modem, "N" indicates failed transmission from fax-modem.
"E" indicates an error occurred while transmitting via fax-modem and a fax may have been only partly transmitted.
"y" and "n" indicate success or failure via TPC.

In April 2000 I changed the method of operation by recording "R" when a recipient requested removal, rather than
wiping their details from my mailing list and records; and keeping "B" records for when TPC actioned a ban on a
recipient's fax-number, but the recipient did not write to ask me to cease faxing. The purpose of these changes
was to keep more accurate and complete records, but the intention was thwarted by the police complaint.
Also in April 2000, I added some further fax numbers to my media mailing list and records, which is why some of the
faxnumbers below have only a single entry, and some indeed have none.

441132420652 yyyyyYyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441132439387 yyyyyYyyynyyyyyyyy
441132445107 yyyyyYyyyyyynyyyyyy
441132455139 n
441132460037 yyyyyYyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441132461105 yyyyyYyyynyyynnnnnn
441132836586 yyyyyYynyyyyyyyyyyy...

Faxes Sent to British Diplomatic/Legal logs

During the 1998-2000 period my records indicate that I sent at least 3,642 faxes to diplomatic and legal offices
located in the British isles, of which 3,345 went via TPC's email-to-fax service and 297 were sent via fax-modem
direct from my computer. The actual figure is somewhat higher since, for most of this period, whenever a recipient
asked to be deleted from my mailing list, I totally wiped all entries including that from the logfile.

In the records "Y" indicates successful transmission from fax-modem, "N" indicates failed transmission from fax-modem.
"E" indicates an error occurred while transmitting via fax-modem and a fax may have been only partly transmitted.
"y" and "n" indicate success or failure via TPC.

In April 2000 I changed the method of operation by recording "R" when a recipient requested removal, rather than
wiping their details from my mailing list and records; and keeping "B" records for when TPC actioned a ban on a
recipient's fax-number, but the recipient did not write to ask me to cease faxing. The purpose of these changes
was to keep more accurate and complete records, but the intention was thwarted by the police complaint.

441712011004 yyyyYyynyyyyyny
441712210448 yyynYnynyyyyy
441712212818 yyyyYyyyyyyyy
441712215685 yyyyYyyyyyyyy
441712250947 nynnYyynyyyyy
441712252130 nnnnYynnyyyyn
441712253024 ynyyYyyyyyyyy
441712253862...